If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Nimbus 21C instrument panel
I'm planning the installation of a new Borgelt B50 to replace an old Pirol
vario. The Pirol used three 61mm holes so the 57mm B50 units won't fit nor will the G meter I'd planned to add. Arghhhh! So, new panel time. Anybody got a new or used panel laying around? If not, my choices seem to be: A. A new panel from Shempp-Hirth or B. Have one custom made by an outfit like Panel Pilot or C. Make one myself. I've made several panels and they are a LOT of work with a risk that the part will be ruined at the last moment by the slip of a drill point. (been there - done that) Bill Daniels |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
easiest and best material to use is plain Phenolic sheet material.machines
easily, can be cut with a bandsaw or even saber saw, drills easily, sands easily and comes in a variety of colors and base materials..... I've made dozens of instrument panels from this material and can knock out a simple flat panel like the Nimbus types easily in an evening with a band saw and drum sander.....a flat sheet large enough for a Nimbus panel should cost no more than about $20.00! see www.mcmaster.com page 3341 tim www.wingsandwheels.com "Bill Daniels" wrote in message news:eezad.347181$mD.247702@attbi_s02... I'm planning the installation of a new Borgelt B50 to replace an old Pirol vario. The Pirol used three 61mm holes so the 57mm B50 units won't fit nor will the G meter I'd planned to add. Arghhhh! So, new panel time. Anybody got a new or used panel laying around? If not, my choices seem to be: A. A new panel from Shempp-Hirth or B. Have one custom made by an outfit like Panel Pilot or C. Make one myself. I've made several panels and they are a LOT of work with a risk that the part will be ruined at the last moment by the slip of a drill point. (been there - done that) Bill Daniels |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Tim Mara" wrote in message ... easiest and best material to use is plain Phenolic sheet material.machines easily, can be cut with a bandsaw or even saber saw, drills easily, sands easily and comes in a variety of colors and base materials..... I've made dozens of instrument panels from this material and can knock out a simple flat panel like the Nimbus types easily in an evening with a band saw and drum sander.....a flat sheet large enough for a Nimbus panel should cost no more than about $20.00! see www.mcmaster.com page 3341 tim www.wingsandwheels.com That's an interesting idea. However, looking at the original panel which is heavy 3.5mm alloy, I suspect that it also serves as a stiffening bulkhead for the cockpit area. I think I will stick with aluminum. Bill Daniels |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Tim Mara wrote:
easiest and best material to use is plain Phenolic sheet material. What's the failure mode of this material in a crash, for instance. I recall long sharp pieces but could be wrong. Tony V. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
really depends on how large the panel is and how well it's supported, but
typically the 1/8" is plenty.......but use the fiberglass material, not the canvas or cotton, it is stronger tim "Todd Pattist" wrote in message ... "Tim Mara" wrote: easiest and best material to use is plain Phenolic sheet material. a flat sheet large enough for a Nimbus panel should cost no more than about $20.00! see www.mcmaster.com page 3341 Tim, What thicknesss do you use for a Phenolic sheet panel? Todd Pattist - "WH" Ventus C (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
That's an interesting idea. However, looking at the original panel which is heavy 3.5mm alloy, I suspect that it also serves as a stiffening bulkhead for the cockpit area. I can't say for sure..but I honestly doubt this I think I will stick with aluminum. I think aluminum will be more vicious in a crash........the fiberglass phenolic sheet is very strong, but can break and would break at the thin areas between the instrument holes in a violent crash.the metal probably would not but could go through you instead.....for this reason I think you'll find no more new gliders made with metal panels tim Bill Daniels |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
see my last post.......Phenolic sheet is essentially a fiberglass (could be
other base materials like cotton or canvas, paper ect) panel as used in most if not all new gliders..you could use the canvas or cotton based phenolic sheet as well....it is not as sturdy as the fibergass sheet but ceratinly, if used in the right panel types would be strong enough (you'd want a bit more "meat" between the instrument openings) and I have used this material also for more basic panels like in vintage ships and this type phenolic does break more cleanly....the material is quite inexpensive and you could try some samples for yourself. Since many gliders are already experimental as was the one I believe that started this thread, it could be used without having to be a certified part. tim "Tony Verhulst" wrote in message ... Tim Mara wrote: easiest and best material to use is plain Phenolic sheet material. What's the failure mode of this material in a crash, for instance. I recall long sharp pieces but could be wrong. Tony V. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
A trick I picked up on, a few years back was to take
the face from a junk instrument (57 & 80mm) and use it as a template. I use them to mark the location of all instruments and after cutting the holes with circular saw in the drill press, I use my templates as a guide when drilling the instrument mounting holes. BTW, most instrument panels are quite weak without the instruments, but regain their strength through the installed instruments. In most crashes, the sides of the cockpit bulge out, so consider the strength the instrument panel will provide to resist this bulging out movement. JJ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I've used hole saws myself.these are hard to find in 57mm (2.25") and 80mm
(3.125") but again... www.mcmaster.com had these and you won't find these sizes in the Home depot or other common local stores....though these were expensive... I use the hole saws then placed metal instrument hole reducers (I have these) over the hoe and finished with drum sanders (you can buy these at local stores) for final fitting.I also use a dremel type tool with small sanding drums for the cutouts for altimeter adjusters etc..all these tools work amazingly well in Phenolic sheets.I am sure good sharp router bits will also work well though I haven't needed to sue these....having a good drill press is necessary to use the hole saws though and a real aid with the drum sanders as well..gives you a good excuse to own these tools ) tim "Todd Pattist" wrote in message ... "Tim Mara" wrote: really depends on how large the panel is and how well it's supported, but typically the 1/8" is plenty.......but use the fiberglass material, not the canvas or cotton, it is stronger Thanks. When I've made panels, I've used a router and template. I mark the center of the instrument holes I want. Then I use an undersized hole saw to get close to the instrument hole size needed, then clamp the template to the sheet, drill the mount holes through the template mount holes, then use the router to enlarge the undersize main hole and get good clean edges and the final exact shape and size instrument hole needed. Will a router give a good clean edge on Phenolic sheet? Todd Pattist - "WH" Ventus C (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Tim Mara wrote:
That's an interesting idea. However, looking at the original panel which is heavy 3.5mm alloy, I suspect that it also serves as a stiffening bulkhead for the cockpit area. I can't say for sure..but I honestly doubt this I think I will stick with aluminum. I think aluminum will be more vicious in a crash........the fiberglass phenolic sheet is very strong, but can break and would break at the thin areas between the instrument holes in a violent crash.the metal probably would not but could go through you instead.....for this reason I think you'll find no more new gliders made with metal panels Typically, the new designs have panels that rise so it's easier to bail out, so the panel doesn't contribute to strength in any way. They also have markedly stronger edges along the canopy opening for crash protection. An old design like Bill's might use the panel to prevent the sidewalls from bending out in a crash. The designer or factory is most likely to know this, and I'd suggest contacting them about the proper material. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Instrument Checkride passed (Long) | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | February 11th 05 02:41 AM |
Instrument panel labelling options | John Galban | Home Built | 12 | November 18th 04 10:42 PM |
Logging approaches | Ron Garrison | Instrument Flight Rules | 109 | March 2nd 04 05:54 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
CAD outline of Rans S6S instrument panel? | Rob Turk | Home Built | 2 | October 21st 03 09:27 PM |