For Keith Willshaw...

The truth is already well known, and I like insulting the insane. call it a
foible.

Whose truth?

Those who favor the reopening Pearl Harbor case are in majority today.

As far as I know Sacco&Venzetti too were convicted according to the "truth that
was very well known".

Nervousness that you are insane? - I find it amusing, not scary.

Glad to hear that.

More likely they were trying to do a humane service to Kimmel's family.

Really? Bill text was too strongly worded for a such humane service and
included several referrals to various documents that charged FDR adm.with
conspiracy and that was the reason why no US president dared to sign it and no
US president will ever dare to sign it.
Its obvious if Kimmel exonorated,next step will be the reopening of Pearl
Harbor case,so the establlishment will prevent this no matter what.

On 12 Jun 2004 01:01:35 GMT, (Denyav) wrote:

The truth is already well known, and I like insulting the insane. call it a
foible.

Whose truth?

Those who favor the reopening Pearl Harbor case are in majority today.

Really? Can you provide a cite for that? Or is it contained in a scret
document suppressed by the guvmint?

Peter Kemp

In article ,
on 12 Jun 2004 01:01:35 GMT,
Denyav attempted to say .....

The truth is already well known, and I like insulting the insane. call it a
foible.

Whose truth?

Those who favor the reopening Pearl Harbor case are in majority today.

In which alternate reality ?

Or is it just all those voices ?

--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

In article ,
on 12 Jun 2004 01:16:57 GMT,
Denyav attempted to say .....

More likely they were trying to do a humane service to Kimmel's family.

Really? Bill text was too strongly worded for a such humane service and
included several referrals to various documents that charged FDR adm.with
conspiracy and that was the reason why no US president dared to sign it and no
US president will ever dare to sign it.
Its obvious if Kimmel exonorated,next step will be the reopening of Pearl
Harbor case,so the establlishment will prevent this no matter what.

OH MY GOD your right, and YOU know the truth.

Yo had better go into hiding ASAP my friend, or the CABAL will track you
down and you might suffer a suicide....



--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

In article ,
on 12 Jun 2004 00:50:33 GMT,
Denyav attempted to say .....

In the world of the lunatic conspiracy nut, a total lack of supporting
evidence is the most convincing evidence of all.

Apparently those lunatic conspirators somehow managed to convince even the
members of Congress.

You give members of congress way too much credit



This kind of accusations are usually the last line of defense for those who
want the things that were covered up,remain also covered up.




--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

In article ,
on Sat, 12 Jun 2004 10:43:43 +1000,
L'acrobat attempted to say .....


"Tank Fixer" wrote in message
k.net...
In article ,
on 09 Jun 2004 15:49:02 GMT,
Denyav attempted to say .....

1) They didnt


This is the whole point .according to the Government they did
not,according to
the Intelligence officers they did and they did it repeately.
On eve of Pearl Harbor attact,even during a secret White House meeting
they
discussed their Pearl Harbor specific information.
But of course White House denies even this meeting!.

Yet YOU know of this secret meeting ?

In the world of the lunatic conspiracy nut, a total lack of supporting
evidence is the most convincing evidence of all.


I forgot that one.
And that lack of evidence is also proof of the conspiracy.

--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

In which alternate reality

1)Ft.Sumter
2)USS Maine
3)Pearl Harbor
4)9/11

This kind of operations should be a thing of the past,but you can not prevent
the recurrence of such events by covering them up.

"Denyav" wrote in message
...
In the world of the lunatic conspiracy nut, a total lack of supporting
evidence is the most convincing evidence of all.

Apparently those lunatic conspirators somehow managed to convince even
the
members of Congress.

Or the fact that it would have no real world impact and would be seen as
being nice to the next of kin made it seem reasonable.


This kind of accusations are usually the last line of defense for those
who
want the things that were covered up,remain also covered up.

The problem you run into is that I have no stake at all in the Pearl Harbour
issue. I just like poking fun at mad people.

"Denyav" wrote in message
...
The truth is already well known, and I like insulting the insane. call it
a
foible.

Whose truth?

Those who favor the reopening Pearl Harbor case are in majority today.


And the "figures" for that come from another of your "truths" do they?