I need to trace an IP address

Buttman wrote in news:furbjr$88t$1
@registered.motzarella.org:

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:

I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

Abourt as much as you do, anyway.


Bertie

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:

I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward my
IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no doubt
that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because they've
said so.

I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.


I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?

-c
CP-ASEL-IA

You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:

I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue with
Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?

I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does tracing an
IP have to do with piloting?

He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful toward my
IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have no doubt
that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums because they've
said so.

I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious. He's the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake. He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it as a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.


I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?

-c
CP-ASEL-IA

You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile posts?

gregvk wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote in news:fur7sf$38u$4
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

Jim Logajan wrote in
:

gregvk wrote:
He's not "warning" anyone of anything they can't see for
themselves. He must think everyone is ****ing stupid.

Sigh.

He suspects that you are counting on a few people to overlook the
change in the Newsgroups header. It happens not through stupidity
but simple oversight. You know that and I know that and Larry knows
that.

I've seen it happen and have no doubt you have too. The classic
trick used to be to add misc.test so that anyone responding who
wasn't paying attention would get auto-responder e-mails they
weren't expecting. But in an age of constant spam, that old trick is
like spitting into the ocean. (Plus the number of autoresponders is
down to one or two I think.)

Say - you could always try to fight your own fights rather than
trying to drag in hounds from other groups.

Moi? Fight? About what? BTW, are you confused about who you're
talking to or do you also think the the vamp is my sock?

BTW, nice try with the old froup snipping trick. That's very much
frowned on in my circles.


Bertie



What sort of monumental dumbass doesn't check the xpost before they
send an article? Seriously, I've never even heard anyone suggest that
before. Are there really people that dumb in this world? Wow. What
a frightening idea.


Lots of 'em!

Even more amazing there are netkkops dumb enough to try and warn off
others....



Bertie

Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Buttman wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation. The
quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by
another poster. In other words, the information about the bio was
NOT used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in
response to what was said.


And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article of
being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap by
flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you agree
it should be deleted?

You CAN'T be this stupid!


You underestiamte him.

Bertie

You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"



Bertie

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Buttman wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation. The
quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by
another poster. In other words, the information about the bio was
NOT used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in
response to what was said.

And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article of
being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap by
flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you agree
it should be deleted?
You CAN'T be this stupid!


You underestiamte him.

Bertie

You might be right.

I fear that "shutting down the engine on the student on takeoff by
shutting down the fuel selector" that he and I tangled on means we're
not going steady any longer :-))

D

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:15:58 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:

Buttman wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation. The
quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by
another poster. In other words, the information about the bio was NOT
used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in response
to what was said.


And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article of
being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap by
flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you agree it
should be deleted?

You CAN'T be this stupid! But.........:-)

Unnecessary comment. Shows REAL agenda here. You REALLY need some
lessons in how to nail people. You're way too obvious with statements
like this one. It fairly shouts that you have "other issues" with the
person you're addressing. In my case, you seem to be harboring a bit of
issue over that run in we had a while back when I told you you were the
worst CFI I've ever encountered on Usenet. :-)

It doesn't matter really.

Oh, no. It doesn't matter at all. *make a thread asking for help tracing
the IP of the person who deleted my wiki page*


All you have succeeded in doing is to remind me the article is no longer
needed.
If you wish to consider this some sort of victory, please do so.

As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made for
the exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with
Wikipedia.

Oh, I see. Its just a coincidence that you decide to remove your self-
written vanity article less than 12 hours after somebody with a
roadrunner connection in El Paso (which may or may not be me) decides
to flag it as against the wikipedia guidelines.

No, as I said, it was NOT coincidence. The "activity" here on the forum
coupled with realizing that the article was being used as a hammer as
you have done here simply keyed my actions to go to Wiki. To tell you
the truth, until Mxsmanic's post, I had virtually forgotten the article
was there. You can verify that by searching for the last time I
mentioned it on Usenet. In fact, I think I'm fairly safe in telling you
that what you will find are very few if any times I have mentioned the
Wiki article unless someone else mentioned it first; which of course
shoots a rather large hole in your "self importance" theory.

It doesn't matter how many times you have mentioned it in the last year,
the point id you wrote your own damn wikipedia article. I find it funny
how you repeatedly can't grasp why this is so humorous to people my me
and apparently mxsmanic who see you as nothing but a parody of the kind
of person you claim to be.

It's especially funny because the article reads exactly like your posts
here. Nothing but half-assed claims of notoriety alongside substance-less
fluff all wrapped up in image-conscious tone.

Dudley Henriques wrote in news:5pOdnV-
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Buttman wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation.
The
quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by
another poster. In other words, the information about the bio was
NOT used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in
response to what was said.

And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article
of
being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap
by
flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you agree
it should be deleted?
You CAN'T be this stupid!


You underestiamte him.

Bertie

You might be right.

I fear that "shutting down the engine on the student on takeoff by
shutting down the fuel selector" that he and I tangled on means we're
not going steady any longer :-))


As you know, I'm all for a creative approach to instructing, but WTF is
that supposed to teach anyone? Leaving aside he fact that it's gaurnteed
to eventually end up in a wreck...


bertie


Bertie

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"



Bertie

I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices it :-))
D