If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
RST Engineering wrote: And I'm not sure who you are talking to without at least a word or two of the prior message. The claim was that you could be a CFI-A w/o an instrument rating on your commercial pilot certificate. That is not the case. There used to be an instructor rating that did not require an instrument rating but I believe 1973 was the last year you could still exercise that rating (it was actually a rating that went on your pilot certificate). Today, all CFI-A are instrument rated on their pilot certificates. If someone believes there is a CFI-A out there w/o an instrument rating I would challenge them to 1) Post that person's certificate here from the FAA registry showing a CFI-A certicicate w/o an instrument rating on their pilot certificate or 2) Post the name of the FSDO that is issuing CFI-A tickets to pilots w/o requiring instrument ratings on their commercial pilot certificates. We can figure this out pretty quick. If those that claim you can be a CFI in an airplane w/o an instrument rating would just show ONE CFI-A w/o an instrument rating. -Robert |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
BTW: I post the same challenge for commercial. Show me one CFI-A from
registry.faa.gov who does not hold a commercial pilots certificate or ATP. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
oups.com... I'm not sure what you are trying to day. I'm trying to say that the requirement that one holds a Commercial pilot certificate in order to take the CFI exam and to receive the CFI certificate has nothing to do with whether one is required to have a valid Commercial pilot certificate in order to use the CFI certificate. The fact is that there are no CFI-Airplane instructors that are currently eligible to teach in aircraft that do not have an instrument rating. That's a complete non-sequitur to your post to which I replied. However...you wrote: "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ups.com... But you do have to have a commerical or ATP ticket to show up for your CFI checkride. Which has absolutely nothing to do with whether a CFI is required to have an instrument rating. If you believe you know of a FSDO that is issuing CFI's to pilots w/o an instrument rating, please post the name of the FSDO. I have no idea how you got on to the topic of having an instrument rating, when we were talking about having a Commercial certificate. Pete |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
oups.com... The claim was that you could be a CFI-A w/o an instrument rating on your commercial pilot certificate. What claim? I didn't make that claim. I simply pointed out that not having an instrument rating was in no way a barrier to having a Commercial certificate. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
oups.com... BTW: I post the same challenge for commercial. Likewise, I made no claim about HOLDING a Commercial pilot certificate. I simply pointed out that one need not USE a Commercial pilot certificate to USE a CFI certificate. It seems to me you managed to get yourself turned around in the thread somewhere. At least with respect to your replies to my posts, you appear to not have been actually reading my posts. Pete |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
This is what started this thread...
"For example, if I wanted to apply for a CFII, I would have to have the instrument rating. If I wanted to apply for a CFI SEL, I would have to have a commercial with a SEL rating on it -- no instrument. " That statement is clearly wrong (at least with regard to CFI SE (there is no CFI SEL) that is exercisable post 1973. -Robert |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
oups.com... This is what started this thread... But "this" is not what you replied to. [...] That statement is clearly wrong (at least with regard to CFI SE (there is no CFI SEL) that is exercisable post 1973. You are correct, it's wrong. If that was the point you wanted to make earlier, you should have replied to the post in which that text appeared, rather than replying to mine, and replying with information that was irrelevant to my post. You may also consider actually *quoting* the text to which you are replying. This will do two things: help those reading your posts have a clue as to what you intend to comment on; and help YOU to understand better which posts you are actually replying to. Pete |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
So ya just opened up a whole rats nest.
Whatever anyone tells you, someone else will disagree. So I'm not offering any advice at all - just asking a question Do you want an experienced CFI, or a green as grass CFI? It's a free world - and you may indeed decide that it is your lot to pay for the early training of new, green behind the ears CFI - or you may decide that your hard earned and limited funds are better spent on a proven experienced CFI. It's up to you - I'm going to get **** for even raising the doubt Do what feels best - you don't owe anyone anything! Tony C-GICE In article JmcNe.260850$x96.20579@attbi_s72, "Mediacom" wrote: Well, after lingering in these groups for a while and dreaming about the day I could start flight lessons I think that day is finally here. I made a trip out to the local FBO to figure out what exactly the next step is and more specifically how I go about choosing a flight instructor. It turns out that the experienced instructors all have pretty full schedules mainly because of charter flights. There is at least one experienced CFI that might have some openings. The manager of the FBO recommended that I talk to a new CFI at the FBO. He is brand new. He just got his CFI a few months ago and he is not instrument rated. I guess I am looking for any advice on starting lessons with a "baby" CFI. Obvious concerns are 1. That he will be hesitant to put his students up for a check ride because he will not want them to fail. 2. I might miss out on the wisdom of a more experienced pilot. 3. His lack of an instrument rating will make me miss out on some wisdom in that area as well. Obviously I know that CFIs have to start with a blank slate and I am not necessarily opposed to taking up lessons with him. I'm just interested in any feedback. Thanks! Jeremy -- Tony Roberts PP-ASEL VFR OTT Night Cessna 172H C-GICE |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Do you want an experienced CFI, or a green as grass CFI?
The answer is obvious, all other things being equal. But all other things are not equal; in fact the mere difference in experience makes some things unequal in ways that counteract the obvious. Jose -- Quantum Mechanics is like this: God =does= play dice with the universe, except there's no God, and there's no dice. And maybe there's no universe. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
No, if you have CFI you can charge.
"RST Engineering" wrote in message ... So long as (s)he isn't charging the student ... Jim "Gig 601XL Builder" wr.giacona@coxDOTnet wrote in message news:VxqNe.2119$7f5.1954@okepread01... I don't understand why you think they would interpret it that way. They have already made it very clear that an instructor isn't in the airplane to fly but rather to teach. A CFI isn't exercising the privileges of his commercial ticket when he is teaching as exampled by NOT having to have a 2nd class medical. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|