RNAV (GPS) Rwy 5 at KLHZ

FYI I've sent the following to NACO and to Jeppesen. I'm not asking the
NG for help, I'm just letting the NG know what I asked of NACO and Jepp.
Anyone is welcome to comment, of course.

Can you please help me reconcile the differences
between the NACO and Jeppesen manifestations of this
chart? This is RNAV (GPS) Rwy 5 at KLHZ, Louisburg /
Franklin County, NC.

The Jepp chart is labeled 21-APR 06.
Then NACO chart is labeled Orig-B 06159.

On the Jepp chart,
- there are LNAV minima only.
- it carries the note "Only authorized operators may
use VNAV DA(H) in lieu of MDA(H).

On the NACO chart,
- there are LNAV and LPV minima.
- the LNAV/VNAV DA is charted "NA".
- there is no note about authorized operators.

Dave Butler wrote:
FYI I've sent the following to NACO and to Jeppesen. I'm not asking the
NG for help, I'm just letting the NG know what I asked of NACO and Jepp.
Anyone is welcome to comment, of course.

Can you please help me reconcile the differences
between the NACO and Jeppesen manifestations of this
chart? This is RNAV (GPS) Rwy 5 at KLHZ, Louisburg /
Franklin County, NC.

The Jepp chart is labeled 21-APR 06.
Then NACO chart is labeled Orig-B 06159.

On the Jepp chart,
- there are LNAV minima only.
- it carries the note "Only authorized operators may
use VNAV DA(H) in lieu of MDA(H).

On the NACO chart,
- there are LNAV and LPV minima.
- the LNAV/VNAV DA is charted "NA".
- there is no note about authorized operators.

A quick update on this: I got an email response from Jeppesen saying
that the problems was previously reported and is under investigation. I
got an email response from NACO (actually NACG, the G is for "Group")
saying that the NACG chart is correct as published.

Dave