A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

U.K. near-midairs



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old November 26th 04, 05:58 PM
Mark James Boyd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Marc Ramsey wrote:
Mark James Boyd wrote:
In the US, I'm not aware of any ACTUAL midair collisions between a
glider and non-glider that are more than 4 miles from an airport.


You might want to ask Chip Garner about the A-7 that ate 3 feet of one
of his wings. There have been a few others between airplanes and
gliders, in the US and away from airports...


Apr 20, 1986: LS-4 vs. A-7

I've read some others between military and civilian airplanes,
but I haven't found any more glider vs. airplane.

And as far as being on an MTR while there is a NOTAM for its use,
well, I once wandered into an active artillery range too.
When the tree branches started falling off, there was no mystery there.

I'd like to hear about other glider vs. airplane not near an airport,
if others have references...

And thanks to Marc for this one...
--

------------+
Mark J. Boyd
  #22  
Old November 26th 04, 06:01 PM
Mark James Boyd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Nyal Williams wrote:

I inquired about their use in gliders (practically
no weight and could go in fuselage behind wing) and
someone told me they would not give a strong enough
signal for aircraft use owing to the speeds involved.
I have no idea about the validity of this statement.
Couldn't hurt to try it.


I'll let you know...
--

------------+
Mark J. Boyd
  #23  
Old November 26th 04, 07:07 PM
F.L. Whiteley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mark James Boyd" wrote in message
news:41a77ce7$1@darkstar...
Marc Ramsey wrote:
Mark James Boyd wrote:
In the US, I'm not aware of any ACTUAL midair collisions between a
glider and non-glider that are more than 4 miles from an airport.


You might want to ask Chip Garner about the A-7 that ate 3 feet of one
of his wings. There have been a few others between airplanes and
gliders, in the US and away from airports...


Apr 20, 1986: LS-4 vs. A-7

I've read some others between military and civilian airplanes,
but I haven't found any more glider vs. airplane.

And as far as being on an MTR while there is a NOTAM for its use,
well, I once wandered into an active artillery range too.
When the tree branches started falling off, there was no mystery there.

I'd like to hear about other glider vs. airplane not near an airport,
if others have references...

And thanks to Marc for this one...
--

------------+
Mark J. Boyd


George Thelen has one, F-4 at an estimated three foot separation. IIRC,
that's what really got him into writing about safety for Soaring.

Frank Whiteley


  #24  
Old November 26th 04, 07:19 PM
Marc Ramsey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Nyal Williams wrote:
I'm sure I've seen an article about anti-collision
radar available for corporate aircraft. I believe
that they are available, but am unsure how prevalent
they are. There was some comment about this in AOPA(?)
mag a couple of years ago.


It's called TCAS (Traffic Alert/Collision Avoidance System). It's not
radar based, it broadcasts an interrogation signal which causes any
nearby transponders to respond. It calculates range and bearing to
transponders that respond, and shows them on a display in the cockpit.
If there appears to be the threat of collision, it sounds an alarm. If
the other aircraft is TCAS equipped, the two units actually negotiate an
avoidance strategy, then advise the pilots how to maneuver away from the
other aircraft.

Marc
  #25  
Old November 26th 04, 09:13 PM
Eric Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mark James Boyd wrote:

In the US, I'm not aware of any ACTUAL midair collisions between a
glider and non-glider that are more than 4 miles from an airport.


About 15 years ago near Ephrata, Washington, there was a glider/airplane
collision about 10 miles from the airport. Everyone was killed. I don't
remember the details, or even if they were determined with any confidence.

I seem to recall one near Truckee 5-10 years ago, but don't remember how
far it was from the airport.
--
Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

Eric Greenwell
Washington State
USA
  #26  
Old November 26th 04, 09:22 PM
Eric Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ralph Jones wrote:

Signal strength is not the problem: a fiberglass ship with a one-foot
corner reflector inside it will look bigger than a metal sailplane.
The bad news: air traffic control radars are "moving target" systems,
which means they filter out returns that don't have any Doppler shift
to indicate a moving object. I don't know what the minimum detectable
speed is, but if you're under it, they just won't see you.


This is quite variable, depending on the radar and the operator, but if
you present a bigger primary return, your chances are improved. The
filtering may be adjustable, so if you contact them by radio, they are
more likely to get you on the radar.


--
Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

Eric Greenwell
Washington State
USA
  #27  
Old November 27th 04, 12:06 AM
F.L. Whiteley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Eric Greenwell" wrote in message
...
Mark James Boyd wrote:

In the US, I'm not aware of any ACTUAL midair collisions between a
glider and non-glider that are more than 4 miles from an airport.


About 15 years ago near Ephrata, Washington, there was a glider/airplane
collision about 10 miles from the airport. Everyone was killed. I don't
remember the details, or even if they were determined with any confidence.

I seem to recall one near Truckee 5-10 years ago, but don't remember how
far it was from the airport.
--
Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

Eric Greenwell
Washington State
USA

That was the heads down Aero Commander that nearly sliced the Grob in half,
except the oxygen bottle deflected the wing tip upwards. The glider pilot
was flying without parachute, so his option was to fly gently back to
Truckee. IIRC, the bits were jiggling around a bit, but held together long
enough.

Frank Whiteley


  #28  
Old November 27th 04, 12:09 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I was training a young controller once.. and he kept calling out a primary
return as traffic.. slow moving south bound.. altitude unknown.. but I was
seeing more than one return on occasion..

So.. we asked the next pilot going up the airway if he could spot the
traffic... (clue, airway followed river valley north to south).. sure enough
the pilot reported a beautiful V formation of Ducks.. heading south for the
winter.. about 2000ft below his cruising altitude..

Water in the ducks bellies reflect the radar..

BT

"Charles Yeates" wrote in message
...
BTIZ wrote:

It could be your local Halifax controllers are not trying, have to many
filters turned on.. or are just not experienced in radar operation.


It is the filter settings -- they don't want to see birds {:))



  #29  
Old November 27th 04, 05:33 AM
Mark James Boyd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Eric Greenwell wrote:
Mark James Boyd wrote:

In the US, I'm not aware of any ACTUAL midair collisions between a
glider and non-glider that are more than 4 miles from an airport.


About 15 years ago near Ephrata, Washington, there was a glider/airplane
collision about 10 miles from the airport. Everyone was killed. I don't
remember the details, or even if they were determined with any confidence.


Can't find this one in fatals/glider/state of washington on NTSB. Hmmm...
Looked for 1980 to 1999...


I seem to recall one near Truckee 5-10 years ago, but don't remember how
far it was from the airport.


3/31/1998, Grob 102 vs. Aero Commander 690, vicinity of the airport,
all uninjured

--
Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

Eric Greenwell
Washington State
USA



--

------------+
Mark J. Boyd
  #30  
Old November 27th 04, 05:48 AM
Mark James Boyd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

BTIZ wrote:

you'd be better off stuffing in a transponder for their TCAS and for ATC to
really see you.


I think we all understand that putting in a transponder and a
big battery is a more complete solution. I think those
on this thread are simply looking at the lower tech, less expensive,
no recurrent certification alternatives.

At $50 and one pound, this looks pretty good. At $1000 and
10 pounds (including the extra battery) + $160/every two years,
I suspect we'd see fewer takers.

I personally also love the idea of the "star" multi-faceted
reflective tape. I despise the green and light grey color of
my current airplane, for example.

Cheap, passive, low cost solutions have a sort of engineering elegance,
don't you think?

--

------------+
Mark J. Boyd
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.