If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Skycraft Landing Light Question
I'm in the midst of having these lights installed, (they are the
cut-in-the-leading-edge landing lights) and we come to a fork in the road with regards to the wiring. The kit comes with a split L/R on/off switch, and two 10 amp circuit breakers. This means that my existing landing light switch stays in the panel, controlling the nose light only, while this new switch has to go in the panel somewhere, separately controlling EACH wing light. IMHO, this is stupid. Why would I *ever* want to turn on, for example, only the left landing light? My idea is to replace the existing landing light switch with the new split switch, and put the nose light on the left half, while putting BOTH wing lights on the right half of the switch. (This would require a 20 amp breaker on the right half of the circuit, instead of the 10 amp that is supplied.) My A&P says Skycraft's STC doesn't cover that option, and he would have to get a field approval, blah, blah, blah. His idea is to remove my pitot heat switch from the little "bank" of switches on my 235, and install the new split landing light switch in its place. This will put it right next to the existing nose light switch, so turning on the landing light(s) will be almost as simple as it is now (or would be with my idea). The pitot heat switch would then be relocated in the plane, somewhere. This is obviously better than installing the landing light switch in some awkward place, but it still seems goofy to me. What do you guys think? Anyone ever installed these things? What did you do with the switches? Thanks! -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Jay Honeck wrote:
What do you guys think? Anyone ever installed these things? What did you do with the switches? A relay with the proper approvals would work all the lights from a single switch... Look at the anticollision people that make the lights rotate in sequence, those are solid-state controlled... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Make sure that the switch is up to the job of running both lights off one
side. You may want a relay somewhere. You don't double the CB rating either. The CBs are there to protect the wiring and you have two wires going to different places. If you go to one CB, it has to pop if *either* the L or R circuit shorts. You could use a single 20A CB if you use heavier wire from the CB to both lights. Mike MU-2 "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:Gk4Md.43024$IV5.24943@attbi_s54... I'm in the midst of having these lights installed, (they are the cut-in-the-leading-edge landing lights) and we come to a fork in the road with regards to the wiring. The kit comes with a split L/R on/off switch, and two 10 amp circuit breakers. This means that my existing landing light switch stays in the panel, controlling the nose light only, while this new switch has to go in the panel somewhere, separately controlling EACH wing light. IMHO, this is stupid. Why would I *ever* want to turn on, for example, only the left landing light? My idea is to replace the existing landing light switch with the new split switch, and put the nose light on the left half, while putting BOTH wing lights on the right half of the switch. (This would require a 20 amp breaker on the right half of the circuit, instead of the 10 amp that is supplied.) My A&P says Skycraft's STC doesn't cover that option, and he would have to get a field approval, blah, blah, blah. His idea is to remove my pitot heat switch from the little "bank" of switches on my 235, and install the new split landing light switch in its place. This will put it right next to the existing nose light switch, so turning on the landing light(s) will be almost as simple as it is now (or would be with my idea). The pitot heat switch would then be relocated in the plane, somewhere. This is obviously better than installing the landing light switch in some awkward place, but it still seems goofy to me. What do you guys think? Anyone ever installed these things? What did you do with the switches? Thanks! -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Jay Honeck wrote:
: I'm in the midst of having these lights installed, (they are the : cut-in-the-leading-edge landing lights) and we come to a fork in the road : with regards to the wiring. : The kit comes with a split L/R on/off switch, and two 10 amp circuit : breakers. This means that my existing landing light switch stays in the : panel, controlling the nose light only, while this new switch has to go in : the panel somewhere, separately controlling EACH wing light. Every airplane that I have seen with these lights has had the centerline cowl mounted landing light removed and faired over. The 2-way switch was in place of the original landing light switch. -- Aaron C. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:Gk4Md.43024$IV5.24943@attbi_s54... IMHO, this is stupid. Why would I *ever* want to turn on, for example, only the left landing light? My idea is to replace the existing landing light switch with the new split switch, and put the nose light on the left half, while putting BOTH wing lights on the right half of the switch. (This would require a 20 amp breaker on the right half of the circuit, instead of the 10 amp that is supplied.) You may want to turn it OFF, say if it's on fire. Just change it willy nilly, anyway you want. Then get your own STC. Skycraft engineers are probably just a bunch of idiots. Karl |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Jay Honeck wrote:
: My A&P says Skycraft's STC doesn't cover that option, and he would have to : get a field approval, blah, blah, blah. His idea is to remove my pitot : heat switch from the little "bank" of switches on my 235, and install the : new split landing light switch in its place. This will put it right next to : the existing nose light switch, so turning on the landing light(s) will be : almost as simple as it is now (or would be with my idea). : The pitot heat switch would then be relocated in the plane, somewhere. I second the comment regarding the current capability of the switch. Especially with a split toggle switch like that, it may have a max current that prevents using both at the same time. If it's got enough rating, check the wire size and CB rating and the bulb current draw against AC43 and field-approve it the way you want. If it doesn't have enough current, you could go the relay route as others have suggested. The FSDO might like that better, since you wouldn't be appreciably modifying the kit with larger wire, fewer CB's, etc. I think having individual controls over which lights are on is a good thing. Maybe not three separate switches, but it's good to not burn out the bulbs, draw ****loads from the alternator at low (descent) RPM, and blind other people all at once... Selective evils with maybe 2 separate switches. OR... get a split switch where each is SPDT with a center detent "off" position. Wire the four potential positions into a "landing-light code" that only you know how to decipher... -Cory -- ************************************************** *********************** * Cory Papenfuss * * Electrical Engineering candidate Ph.D. graduate student * * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University * ************************************************** *********************** |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
how about replacing the current nose mounted landing light with a much lower
wattage light, for taxiing. Maybe have it come on with the nav lights. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I was just going to inquire if the alternator was up to running
everything with the power pulled back... wrote: I think having individual controls over which lights are on is a good thing. Maybe not three separate switches, but it's good to not burn out the bulbs, draw ****loads from the alternator at low (descent) RPM, and blind other people all at once... Selective evils with maybe 2 separate switches. OR... get a split switch where each is SPDT with a center detent "off" position. Wire the four potential positions into a "landing-light code" that only you know how to decipher... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I thought the Skycraft's STC required the removal of the nose light.. I
would give them a call. Just seems like we went over this on the last install we did but it might have been a small ALT. Jon Becker Jay Honeck wrote: I'm in the midst of having these lights installed, (they are the cut-in-the-leading-edge landing lights) and we come to a fork in the road with regards to the wiring. The kit comes with a split L/R on/off switch, and two 10 amp circuit breakers. This means that my existing landing light switch stays in the panel, controlling the nose light only, while this new switch has to go in the panel somewhere, separately controlling EACH wing light. IMHO, this is stupid. Why would I *ever* want to turn on, for example, only the left landing light? My idea is to replace the existing landing light switch with the new split switch, and put the nose light on the left half, while putting BOTH wing lights on the right half of the switch. (This would require a 20 amp breaker on the right half of the circuit, instead of the 10 amp that is supplied.) My A&P says Skycraft's STC doesn't cover that option, and he would have to get a field approval, blah, blah, blah. His idea is to remove my pitot heat switch from the little "bank" of switches on my 235, and install the new split landing light switch in its place. This will put it right next to the existing nose light switch, so turning on the landing light(s) will be almost as simple as it is now (or would be with my idea). The pitot heat switch would then be relocated in the plane, somewhere. This is obviously better than installing the landing light switch in some awkward place, but it still seems goofy to me. What do you guys think? Anyone ever installed these things? What did you do with the switches? Thanks! -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Mike W." wrote: how about replacing the current nose mounted landing light with a much lower wattage light, for taxiing. Maybe have it come on with the nav lights. The installation will still have to be able to handle the drain of the usual bulb for that fixture, just in case someone puts one in at a later date. George Patterson He who would distinguish what is true from what is false must have an adequate understanding of truth and falsehood. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Landing Light CB | Hankal | Owning | 25 | August 25th 04 02:22 AM |
Would a 3 million Candlepower spotlight make a good landing light? | Legrande Harris | Home Built | 6 | June 15th 04 06:32 AM |
C-172 landing light switch | JFLEISC | Owning | 10 | May 5th 04 11:05 PM |
The light bulb | Greasy Rider | Military Aviation | 6 | March 2nd 04 12:07 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |