A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Comm Ant. Top or Bottom?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old January 22nd 09, 05:31 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Wayne Paul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 905
Default Comm Ant. Top or Bottom?


"RST Engineering" wrote in message
m...

BTW, what makes you think that I have a high SWR? Normally sailplane
communicate with their crews and other sailplanes on 123.3 or 124.5 MHz.
I have tuned my antenna for 123.3 MHz At that frequency the SWR is 1.2
to 1. At the extremes of the comm frequencies it does not exceed 2 to 1.



I do not find 124.5 as a legal sailplane frequency in my copy of the FCC
regs. Mind giving me a pointer to it?

BTW, snippety doo-dah, snippety aye is a GOOD thing to do.

Jim

You are correct, I can't type. The frequencies are 123.3 and 123.5 MHz.

BTW. I own one of your RST-721 test sets and love it! "Snippety doo-doh,
snippety aye ..." Tuning complete.

Wayne
HP-14 "6F"
http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder/HP-14/N990/N990.html


  #12  
Old January 22nd 09, 05:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Stuart Fields
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 43
Default Comm Ant. Top or Bottom?


"Wayne Paul" wrote in message
m...

"Stuart Fields" wrote in message
...

"Wayne Paul" wrote in message
...
Mine is a bent 1/4 wave length antenna mounted on the top of the metal
tail cone. My radio is a 1 watt Filser ART 57. So far I haven't had a
problem communicating airborne aircraft or ground stations.
http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder/HP...P-14_N990d.jpg
http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder/HP...0_Borah_Mt.jpg
http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder/HP.../N990_rain.jpg

Wayne
HP-14 "6F"
http://www.soaridaho.com/


Wayne: All my experience with antennas says that you are not getting as
much as you can due to the high VSWR. That said, if you are getting
everything that you want, why change? Those photos are great. I can
understand why you fly one of them "quiet things". Still haven't gone
for a sail plane ride but it is certainly in my "round to it" bucket.

stu


Thank you for the complements on the picture. I really enjoy the old
HP-14 homebuilt. It was designed in 1964. Mine was completed in 1973 (I
purchased it in 1999.) On Aug 7, 2007 I managed to complete a declared
300 km flight.
http://www.soaridaho.com/Flights/6F_Gold_Distance.html

If you ever have the opportunity to get a flight in a high performance
two-place sailplane ... do it!!

BTW, what makes you think that I have a high SWR? Normally sailplane
communicate with their crews and other sailplanes on 123.3 or 124.5 MHz.
I have tuned my antenna for 123.3 MHz At that frequency the SWR is 1.2
to 1. At the extremes of the comm frequencies it does not exceed 2 to 1.

Wayne
Amateur Radio W7ADK


Wayne: My comments were based on measurements taken on my helicopter with
the bent antenna with both a Bird 43 Power meter and an MFJ antenna
analyzer. The VSWR was never better than three. Discussions with the
antenna mfr showed their claims were a minimum VSWR of 3.
Yeah here I set at Inyokern CA where an acquaintenance of mine got a Silver
C in a Cessna 170. Some 5 hours aloft with a dead engine. He said that the
only reason he had to come down was the sun was setting and he got very cold
at around 20,000msl. The airport is only 4 miles away and a mountain ridge
ride is only $100. Too dang many irons in the fire is my only excuse. That
and I don't want to get hooked into another aviation area right now.

Stu
Retired EE. Also amateur radio tech license.


  #13  
Old January 22nd 09, 05:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Stuart Fields
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 43
Default Comm Ant. Top or Bottom?


"Gig 601Xl Builder" wrote in message
m...
wrote:
In electrical terms it doesn't really matter, assuming the locations
offer a ground-plane that is more or less identical. But the fact
your airplane did not come with an antenna array already installed
begs the question as to type, age, method of construction and so
forth.

For maintenance however, antennae mounted to the top of the structure
usually offer some benefits. But as always, this is a general rule;
you will run into exceptions... without which this Group could not
survive! :-)

Just be careful not to measure Field Strength readings for a system
using the lower side of the hull, since the proximity of the earth
will skew your readings. Your 'Free Space' radiation pattern should
be identical, top or bottom. But here again, that 'Free Space' only
appears in text books. Ain't nothing 'free' nowadays :-)

-R.S.Hoover


The antenna in question is a Comant CI122 bent whip. Considering all the
advice I will mount it on the bottom but make sure there is enough service
loop in the cable to move it if it doesn't work out.


Excellent comments by Hoover. My measurements on my helicopter definitely
were not "Free Space" but were done with the helo on the ground. However,
the antenna mfr. claims were limited and had a statement of minimum VSWR of
3.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FAA ranks near bottom in Government employee morale EatMe[_2_] Piloting 0 November 18th 07 02:50 PM
Here is the most bottom price, best quality [email protected] General Aviation 0 October 29th 07 11:46 AM
FAA ranks near bottom in Government employee morale AirSafetyPatriot Piloting 6 October 20th 07 07:37 AM
xb-35-bottom.jpg Troy24 Aviation Photos 0 July 12th 07 12:07 AM
Lightnings Today, concluded - yippee-bottom.jpg (1/1) Mitchell Holman Aviation Photos 0 January 15th 07 02:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.