A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #191  
Old August 21st 08, 12:19 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion

Abbott writes:

Not from a mental health stand point.


Organizations can be fixated on safety, and mental health is not an issue for
organizations.
  #192  
Old August 21st 08, 12:22 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dudley Henriques[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,546
Default Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion

Abbott wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Mxsmanic wrote:
Dudley Henriques writes:

It most certainly does work this way. If the student doesn't graduate a
good pilot, the instructor has failed. Therefore the instructor by
definition isn't the good instructor in your example.
I wasn't thinking of the graduation. After the pilot graduates, he
flies. A
good pilot is someone who flies well even years after doing what is
necessary
to get a license. The same applies to drivers of cars, doctors, lawyers,
and
so on. It's one thing to pass a test; it's another to stay competent
and/or
perhaps improve over long periods. Instructors have no control over
that.

Anything you say Anthony. I've reached that point where it's time to say
I'm not interested in changing your opinion.

--
Dudley Henriques


Oh, don't stop now, you just got him wound up.


If I do that I'll be going against my own Usenet philosophy (new this
year :-)
If someone engages me respectfully I'll return the respect. If any
difference can't be settled after several exchanges, and if I believe
I'm correct as is the case here, I'll disengage and allow my "adversary"
their opinion without slamming them.
Don't know how long this will last, but I'm giving it a shot anyway :-))

--
Dudley Henriques
  #194  
Old August 21st 08, 12:26 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dudley Henriques[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,546
Default Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion

Abbott wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
...
"The Bunyip Slayer" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote
Looks like we have a winner!

Anthony is NOT here to talk aviation.

Back in high school, when we wanted to bed Mary Jane Rottencrotch, we

didn't
just walk up and say hey, wanna screw?

Neither does Mx. It that respect, he does prove himself much smarter than
many of the "pilots" here, everyday. Are you listening Dudley?

Dudley isn't the problem - I have never seen Dudley respond in any manner
other than to provide an answer to a question. That's what this NG is
supposed to be about after all.


Oh, you mean like this one?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dudley Henriques"
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.piloting
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2008 8:03 AM
Subject: RAP is NOT Dead


Simply one way to deal with morons, nothing more.



--
Dudley Henriques
  #195  
Old August 21st 08, 12:27 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Abbott
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25
Default Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion


"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Abbott writes:

Not from a mental health stand point.


Organizations can be fixated on safety, and mental health is not an issue
for
organizations.


Liar. You weren't talking about organizations, you were talking about
yourself.


  #197  
Old August 21st 08, 12:28 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Abbott
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25
Default Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion


"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Abbott wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Mxsmanic wrote:
Dudley Henriques writes:

It most certainly does work this way. If the student doesn't graduate
a good pilot, the instructor has failed. Therefore the instructor by
definition isn't the good instructor in your example.
I wasn't thinking of the graduation. After the pilot graduates, he
flies. A
good pilot is someone who flies well even years after doing what is
necessary
to get a license. The same applies to drivers of cars, doctors,
lawyers, and
so on. It's one thing to pass a test; it's another to stay competent
and/or
perhaps improve over long periods. Instructors have no control over
that.
Anything you say Anthony. I've reached that point where it's time to say
I'm not interested in changing your opinion.

--
Dudley Henriques


Oh, don't stop now, you just got him wound up.

If I do that I'll be going against my own Usenet philosophy (new this year
:-)
If someone engages me respectfully I'll return the respect. If any
difference can't be settled after several exchanges, and if I believe I'm
correct as is the case here, I'll disengage and allow my "adversary"
their opinion without slamming them.
Don't know how long this will last, but I'm giving it a shot anyway :-))

--
Dudley Henriques


Bull****. You're just tweaking Anthony to spread hate and discontent.


  #199  
Old August 21st 08, 12:32 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dudley Henriques[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,546
Default Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion

Abbott wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Abbott wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Mxsmanic wrote:
Dudley Henriques writes:

It most certainly does work this way. If the student doesn't graduate
a good pilot, the instructor has failed. Therefore the instructor by
definition isn't the good instructor in your example.
I wasn't thinking of the graduation. After the pilot graduates, he
flies. A
good pilot is someone who flies well even years after doing what is
necessary
to get a license. The same applies to drivers of cars, doctors,
lawyers, and
so on. It's one thing to pass a test; it's another to stay competent
and/or
perhaps improve over long periods. Instructors have no control over
that.
Anything you say Anthony. I've reached that point where it's time to say
I'm not interested in changing your opinion.

--
Dudley Henriques
Oh, don't stop now, you just got him wound up.

If I do that I'll be going against my own Usenet philosophy (new this year
:-)
If someone engages me respectfully I'll return the respect. If any
difference can't be settled after several exchanges, and if I believe I'm
correct as is the case here, I'll disengage and allow my "adversary"
their opinion without slamming them.
Don't know how long this will last, but I'm giving it a shot anyway :-))

--
Dudley Henriques


Bull****. You're just tweaking Anthony to spread hate and discontent.



The facts don't seem to support that argument for anyone actually taking
the trouble to READ my responses to him.

--
Dudley Henriques
  #200  
Old August 21st 08, 12:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dudley Henriques[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,546
Default Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion

Abbott wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
If you are reading anything "complicated" into what I have said, I'm
afraid you might be misinterpreting or misunderstanding the entire point.
Flight instruction in NO WAY has to be complicated, and instructors who
over complicate things with the way they interface with a student might be
in need of some added instruction themselves.
Don't read over complication into a written explanation. In practice, what
you are reading is actually the epitome of simplicity :-)

--
Dudley Henriques


Then how did you ever give instruction.

I'm sure you could lecture a have hour on just the door latch.



Max, what I can't figure out about you is why you bother to do all the
name changes when you post here. You seem to come up as the same message
source under all your names. Hell, I'm the worst computer guy in the
world, and even I have you nailed.
Why not simply post under the same name all the time? Doesn't make any
sense at all. It's childish actually.

--
Dudley Henriques
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sonex Kitplane as a viable aircraft for Sportsman aerobatic contests [email protected] Aerobatics 0 April 24th 08 04:16 PM
Aviation magazine - 100LL alternatives Not Me[_2_] Home Built 1 June 15th 07 02:04 AM
PDA mounting alternatives Jack Glendening Soaring 15 October 14th 05 08:03 PM
SWR meter Alternatives c hinds Home Built 1 June 2nd 04 07:39 PM
Commanche alternatives? John Cook Military Aviation 99 March 24th 04 03:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.