A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Vote, people!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 13th 04, 11:51 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Vote, people!

The Orlando paper has run one of the WE HAVE TO IMPROVE SECURITY articles about light
planes. There's a button to allow you to vote on whether it's needed. Need I say
more?

http://www.wesh.com/news/3297482/detail.html

George Patterson
I childproofed my house, but they *still* get in.
  #2  
Old May 14th 04, 12:06 AM
Bill Denton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I voted, and those opposed to additional security were ahead by a huge
majority!

But I could not help noticing that the news story surrounding this "poll"
was one of the most biased and sensationalistic stories I have ever seen!

With journalism of this quality it's no surprise that 3/4 ths of America
doesn't have a clue...



"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...
The Orlando paper has run one of the WE HAVE TO IMPROVE SECURITY articles

about light
planes. There's a button to allow you to vote on whether it's needed. Need

I say
more?

http://www.wesh.com/news/3297482/detail.html

George Patterson
I childproofed my house, but they *still* get in.



  #3  
Old May 14th 04, 12:14 AM
Paul Tomblin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In a previous article, "G.R. Patterson III" said:
The Orlando paper has run one of the WE HAVE TO IMPROVE SECURITY articles
about light planes. There's a button to allow you to vote on whether it's
needed. Need I say more?

http://www.wesh.com/news/3297482/detail.html


"The plane belonged to Embry-Riddle University. It's one of 70 planes
stolen in the United States since 1999 -- most of them since terrorists
hijacked airliners and used them as missiles on Sept. 11."

Uhhhh - the reason why most of the thefts since 1999 happened *since*
Sept. 11 2001 is because that time period spans under two years before
Sept 11th, and over 2.5 years since. Do the math, brainiacs.


--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
Never meddle in the affairs of NT. It is slow to boot and quick to crash.
-- Stephen Harris
  #4  
Old May 14th 04, 01:23 AM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 13 May 2004 22:51:42 GMT, "G.R. Patterson III"
wrote in Message-Id:
:

The Orlando paper has run one of the WE HAVE TO IMPROVE SECURITY articles about light
planes. There's a button to allow you to vote on whether it's needed. Need I say
more?

http://www.wesh.com/news/3297482/detail.html


Currently the vote is 79% nay, 21% yea. The American people do
possess common sense after all.

This "small aircraft security" issue is unjustly being employed by the
yellow journalistic media who are attempting to use hoped-for public
hysteria toward General Aviation as a vehicle for driving public
participation in their product. The axis of evil (marketing) rears
its ugly head yet again.


--

Irrational beliefs ultimately lead to irrational acts.
-- Larry Dighera,
  #5  
Old May 14th 04, 01:59 AM
Bob Fry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"G.R. Patterson III" writes:

The Orlando paper has run one of the WE HAVE TO IMPROVE SECURITY articles about light
planes. There's a button to allow you to vote on whether it's needed. Need I say
more?

http://www.wesh.com/news/3297482/detail.html


I see the votes are running heavily No (more security not needed), so
I guess that means some reporter will have to work on another, juicier
story.

BTW, in our Friends of University Airport group, our president--who is
very good at working with people--took a reporter and photog from the
local newspaper up for a jaunt prior to our 2nd Annual Open House. We
got a very good writeup in the paper, and now have a contact for the
main mass media source in town. Folks, we gotta play the game....
  #6  
Old May 14th 04, 02:43 AM
Orval Fairbairn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote:

The Orlando paper has run one of the WE HAVE TO IMPROVE SECURITY articles
about light
planes. There's a button to allow you to vote on whether it's needed. Need I
say
more?

http://www.wesh.com/news/3297482/detail.html

George Patterson
I childproofed my house, but they *still* get in.



They have a comment link on their website, so we should all respond to
it. BTW, it is not the Orlando paper, but a TV station, channel 2, which
aired the hit piece last night. It wasn't as bad as the CBS piece of
garbage, because they gave perfunctory time to Phil Boyer of AOPA,
unlike CBS, but it was STILL a hit piece!

The vote is running 858 to 210, or 4:1 AGAINSTt heir proposal.
  #7  
Old May 14th 04, 06:19 AM
Scott G.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University representative Richard Theokas.....

"Had that person's intent been to load it up with some plastic explosives
and go run it into a federal building or something like that, they might
have been able to do that," Theokas said.

What does he think this statement would accomplish? I think Embry-Riddle
should find someone that thinks before they speak.

Scott G.


"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...
The Orlando paper has run one of the WE HAVE TO IMPROVE SECURITY articles

about light
planes. There's a button to allow you to vote on whether it's needed. Need

I say
more?

http://www.wesh.com/news/3297482/detail.html

George Patterson
I childproofed my house, but they *still* get in.



  #8  
Old May 14th 04, 10:30 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Done.

(At present time, 87 percent of respondents say no

On Thu, 13 May 2004 22:51:42 GMT, "G.R. Patterson III"
wrote:

The Orlando paper has run one of the WE HAVE TO IMPROVE SECURITY articles about light
planes. There's a button to allow you to vote on whether it's needed. Need I say
more?

http://www.wesh.com/news/3297482/detail.html

George Patterson
I childproofed my house, but they *still* get in.


all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com
Viva Bush! blog www.vivabush.org
  #9  
Old May 14th 04, 01:45 PM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 14 May 2004 01:43:06 GMT, Orval Fairbairn
wrote in Message-Id:
:

They have a comment link on their website, so we should all respond to
it. BTW, it is not the Orlando paper, but a TV station, channel 2, which
aired the hit piece last night. It wasn't as bad as the CBS piece of
garbage, because they gave perfunctory time to Phil Boyer of AOPA,
unlike CBS, but it was STILL a hit piece!



Apparently, 'tis the season:


-------------------------------------------------------------
AOPA ePilot Volume 6, Issue 20 May 14, 2004
-------------------------------------------------------------

LOCAL TV STATIONS TARGET GA SECURITY TO BOOST RATINGS
In recent weeks, AOPA has contacted TV stations across the country
after being alerted (usually by members) that they were working on
stories about "lax" security at general aviation airports. The
wave of stories is no coincidence. It's the May "sweeps" period,
that time of year when stations will do anything to get the best
possible ratings. "Don't make it easy for them," said AOPA
President Phil Boyer, a former TV senior executive who knows all
the tricks of the trade. "Take sensible steps to secure your
aircraft. Follow all of the Airport Watch guidelines (
http://www.aopa.org/epilot/redir.cfm?adid=4297 ).
Set up a buddy system to check on the aircraft that is tied down
or hangared near yours. In addition to denying the media
opportunities for stories, you'll also deny unauthorized access to
your aircraft." For more, see (
http://www.aopa.org/epilot/redir.cfm?adid=4298 ).
--

Irrational beliefs ultimately lead to irrational acts.
-- Larry Dighera,
  #10  
Old May 14th 04, 02:06 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Scott G." wrote in message
...
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University representative Richard Theokas.....

"Had that person's intent been to load it up with some plastic explosives
and go run it into a federal building or something like that, they might
have been able to do that," Theokas said.

What does he think this statement would accomplish? I think Embry-Riddle
should find someone that thinks before they speak.


What makes you think they even talked to Theokas? They made up everything
else out of whole cloth, why not the quote?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 10:46 PM
Suppressing the Vote (in Florida) WalterM140 Military Aviation 2 August 16th 04 11:16 PM
Bush IS Attempting to Steal the Election WalterM140 Military Aviation 6 June 19th 04 12:30 AM
the complete minute by minute timeline on 911 Krztalizer Military Aviation 27 January 27th 04 04:35 PM
Testing your glide. Are people doing this? Montblack Owning 50 November 1st 03 12:56 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.