If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Persian Tomcats in service
There's a very interesting article in the current issue of Combat Aircraft,
Vol 7, No. 6. It's by Tom Cooper and Liam F. Devlin and titled "Iran: A Formidable Opponent?" The article is about Iran's current air force capabilities, specifically focusing on the Tomcats in Iranian service (it is in keeping with the issue's focus on the retirement of the Tomcat from USN service; several other magazines are doing similar Tomcat farewell issues). According to the authors, the Tomcat remains in frontline Iranian service and in sizeable numbers. The authors claim that in late 2003 a USAF E-3 Sentry tracked 16--yes, SIXTEEN--Iranian Tomcats flying in formation. This was the largest number spotted at one time since 1997, when nine were tracked over the southern Persian Gulf by the US Navy. The article is somewhat defensive in tone. The authors claim that although Western sources report that the Tomcat is barely operable, this is untrue. The Iranians have put a lot of effort into maintaining and even rebuilding their Tomcats and Phantoms, and they may have as many as 65 Phantoms in service. It said that the US has decided that the Tomcat is barely operable because it no longer operates on the borders, but only deep inside Iran. But they claim that this is actually because the Iranians are trying to preserve their assets and keep their most powerful fighter farther from potential harm. They also make a number of other claims, including that the CIA may have acquired or inspected a Russian MiG-31 in 1997, and that the Russians offered 22 secondhand MiG-31 aircraft to the Iranians, who turned them down. (The CIA reportedly sought to buy these aircraft rather than let the Iranians get them.) The article also claims that the Russians offered Su-27s, Su-30s, and MiG-29s to the Iranians, but the Iranians are wary of buying Russian aircraft because the terms are bad. For instance, the Russians do not allow license building of their jet engines. Simply put, the Russians won't give the Iranians enough independence and the Iranians don't want to get stuck in a position of weakness when it comes to acquiring spare parts for their aircraft. There's a lot of amazing stuff in the article and it would be fascinating if true. But one objection that I've heard others make about Cooper and his other co-writer Farzad Bishop is that it is impossible to independently confirm their information. They might conduct a lot of interviews with Iranian pilots and ex-pat Iranians, but we don't know how carefully they check their information. (This article by Cooper and Devlin concedes that fewer Iranians have left the country since the mid-1990s, so it is harder to speak to Iranians outside the country.) Personally, the one thing I'm dubious about is the claim that Western intelligence agencies do not have a good understanding of just how active the Iranian F-14s are. If they turn on their radars, then the US intel assets in the Persian Gulf will detect them. In addition, satellite photos should also indicate how many F-14s are operable. Sure, the Iranians must keep a lot of them in hangars, but occasionally they will move them around airfields and they can be counted. In fact, somebody with a credit card could order up commercial images of Iranian airfields and check for themselves. So I don't buy the claim that US intel officials think that _virtually no_ F-14s or their AWG-9 radars are still operating. My suspicion is that the authors are responding to misinformed trash talking in the aviation press, not to what US intel actually believes about Iranian capabilities. All that said, the one thing that establishes credibility for Cooper and Devlin (as well as Cooper and Bishop in their books on the Iranian F-4s and F-14s) is the impressive array of photos that they have collected. These include aerial refueling shots of F-4s and Su-24s, as well as formation shots of F-5s and other aircraft, and a very cool grainy image of an F-14 at extremely low altitude over the Gulf. That aircraft is in the current blue/gray paint scheme. They also have a photo of an F-14 with an ATM-54A training round alongside, photographed in April 2004. That raises an interesting point--if the Iranians no longer can operate the AIM-54 Phoenix, then why would they be carrying around training rounds? Clearly they retain some kind of AIM-54 Phoenix capability. D |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"End of an era: USN's Tomcats make their final approach before decommissioning" | Mike | Naval Aviation | 15 | April 5th 06 03:45 AM |
Which Military Service is best? | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 33 | September 19th 04 04:12 PM |
Air Force Chief Sounds Off as Service Birthday Approaches | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 18th 04 03:54 AM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
Service Bulletins, Service Letters, Service Spares Letters | O. Sami Saydjari | Owning | 5 | December 26th 03 05:36 AM |