If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Magnus wrote in message ...
Just curious how you guys perform this maneuver. From what I've been taught you should flare with a little power still in to soften the touchdown, and then keep rolling to avoid digging yourself into the runway surface. I just think that it should be possible to land anyway, without any power like you normally land. Just keep the plane airborne as long as possible and keep the nosewheel up as long as you can. Keeping power in just eats up a lot of runway it seems. I mean, how often do you happen to find a rough and long field. Ususally if a soft-field landing is required, it's a pretty short field too out in the bush somewhere. Approach like a short-field and flare as long as possible to soften the touchdown would be my way of doing it. Hi Well, I can think of quite a few landing areas that are long and soft as well as some strips that can be "soft field" with heavy rain, or fresh snow. Have you ever landed on a beach? Hmmm...a beach with fresh snow..but even that is possibleg A precision spot landing (which I think EVERY landing should be) with power to literally slow fly the aircraft to touchdown and decreasing power as the surface dictates. If its grass, sometimes you have no way of knowing how tall the grass is until you settle in it. Same with mud, snow, water. Sand can have soft and hard spots within inches. Numerous times I have landed on soft or unknown surfaces at remote strips and will always opt for the "slow fly touchdown" before I commit myself. On at least one occasion in Mozambique I had to use additional power to keep from gong on my nose in standing water on the only strip available to me way out in the bush. I was crop dusting with a Piper Pawnee at the time. The water coming off the wheels bent both flaps in a shallow V. If I had not used power to stay right side up, I'd have ended up on my nose for sure or at the very least got the prop. Could go on and on describing similar landings with a variety of aircraft including helicopters. That reminds me of the time when I was taking off over a rice paddy and the power sagged a little........but thats for another time!! gggg Ol Shy & Bashful |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Paul Sengupta wrote:
I think the nosewheel legs are stronger than some people who manage to break them would illustrate. There are nosewheels and there are nosewheels. Some, like on C150s, Tripacers, Musketeers etc. are pretty tough (IIRC, the Musketeer nosegear is the same as the mains minus a brake). Others are bent bits of wire with a wheel hanging off the end (Grumman AA5). And others are strong enough, but the bit they attach to has a tendency to get bent when mistreated (C182 firewalls). -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Magnus wrote in message ...
Just curious how you guys perform this maneuver. From what I've been taught you should flare with a little power still in to soften the touchdown, and then keep rolling to avoid digging yourself into the runway surface. I just think that it should be possible to land anyway, without any power like you normally land. Just keep the plane airborne as long as possible and keep the nosewheel up as long as you can. Keeping power in just eats up a lot of runway it seems. I mean, how often do you happen to find a rough and long field. Ususally if a soft-field landing is required, it's a pretty short field too out in the bush somewhere. Approach like a short-field and flare as long as possible to soften the touchdown would be my way of doing it. That's part of the problem with the PTS, a lot of it is not realistic. Yes, most soft fiels are also short (in my experience). I've taken my Mooney into a soft fields and its usually the length that I'm most worried about. Also, a lot of soft fields don't have any go around possible. Most of the soft fields I used in the Aeronca were "one-way" fields because some giant trees or soemthing prevent you from going around. In some planes you can't hold power in the flare (like a Mooney) so you have to get used to planning the approach right. In some fields you don't want to have to hold power becaues losing the engine on short final could mean you're going to hit the trees short of the runway. You can get just a soft a touch down w/o power. In a real (i.e. not PTS) soft field landing you should consider... 1) "Drag the field", i.e. do a low pass and decide where you want to touch the mains and where you want to touch the nose down. 2) Once the mains touch add power to hold the nose off until you reach the part of the field you plan to drop the nose on. This can be further down the field because you don't need as much stopping distance from the nose touch down as the mains. 3) Don't worry about landing on "center line", land in the best part of the field. Notice that the soft field landing is the ONLY landing in the PTS that does not require you to be on center line. -Robert, CFI |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
The nosewheel structure on a Cessna is pretty strong,
but digging it in can cause: a). A prop strike b). A bent firewall c). All of the above I agree with Dave... Nosewheels should be outlawed!!! Get a taildragger!!! John Price CFII/AGI/IGI home.att.net/~jm.price "Paul Sengupta" wrote in message ... "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Dave Stadt wrote: Better yet, get rid of the nose wheel. Easily done if you don't keep it out of the mud. :-) I think the nosewheel legs are stronger than some people who manage to break them would illustrate. One of the students at the flight school where I learnt to fly managed to leave the runway onto the grass at full power. Still at full power he braked hard, dug the nosewheel in and flipped the plane over. The nosewheel leg remained firmly attached but was now pointing upwards. This was a 150. Paul |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
john price wrote: The nosewheel structure on a Cessna is pretty strong, but digging it in can cause: a). A prop strike b). A bent firewall c). All of the above I agree with Dave... Nosewheels should be outlawed!!! Get a taildragger!!! Yeah, main wheels on a taildragger never get dug in the mud. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"bush flying" in the suburbs? | [email protected] | Home Built | 85 | December 28th 04 11:04 PM |
Judge halts work on Navy landing field in eastern N.C. | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 1 | April 21st 04 12:04 PM |
Now THIS is a short field landing | John Harlow | Piloting | 8 | March 16th 04 10:42 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
Off topic - Landing of a B-17 | Ghost | Home Built | 2 | October 28th 03 04:35 PM |