If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Jack White wrote:
"Matt A.00 01 is Matthew Ackerman" wrote in message ... Jack White wrote: "Matt A.00 01 is Matthew Ackerman" wrote in message ... BTov wrote: (Jack White) wrote in message . com... The Eurofighter Typhoon will give the Saudi Armed Forces the capability maintain air superiority over any country in the Middle East including Israel. so what? Israel has the best pilots and crews in the Middle East, but the Eurofighter Typhoon is such a superior aircraft with INCREDIBLE BVR capability superior to any aircraft in the Middle East that even though Saudis are lazy and spoiled, the Eurofighter Typhoon will give the Saudis the best Airforce in the Middle East. The only way Israel can gain back Air Superiority over Saudi Arabia would be if Israel were to buy tons of F-22 Raptors. wutever Saudi Arabia has a much bigger GDP than Israel and has Trillions of dollars of Oil Reserves so there's no way Israel can on its own compete with a country like Saudi Arabia in an arms race. & saudis bemoan poor palistanians while their arab whole is giving only 5%.. ;L The only way Israel can gain back air superiority is if US taxpayers will again have to pay BILLIONS of dollars like they always do for Israel, this time for Israel to get FREE F-22 Raptors from the US Taxpayers. it may be interesting to test this eurofighter against arrows.. Arrows are ABMs not SAMs. They are designed to take a Balistic Missile out at Apogee so nothing hits Israel. They are very effective at doing that, 100 percent of the tests with real Balistic Missiles to be interecepted were succesfully hit by the system at the warhead not the main body as the Patriorts did. The Patriot was orginally designed to take out high flying aircraft not missiles. That is why the body of the rocket stage is what got hit by it every time and the warhead then still fell to earth intact about 1/2 the time. The US lost most of the first Gulf War Casualties to a "shot down" SKUD's warhead that hit a building housing a lot of miltiary personel. The Arrow uses a different system of firing a group of shaped charges at the warhead secton of the missile and body both. The real ideal is to force the warhead itself to explode due to the charges going off on it. Hardly cost effective to shoot down a plane. Israel has several other means of taking out incoming aircraft. It has 12 Patriot Batteries, 1000s of SAMs on the ready and then their air to air capabilities and own air to air misiles and guns. They never faced even odds 1 to 1 and no matter what aircraft the enemy flew they shot them all down and lost very few of their planes to it. I pitty any Arab pilot shot down those at home confront, he better speak the words I surrender in perfect Hebrew or he is dead. They common Israeli does not speak the symetic variation called Arabic. It is not their responsibility to know for sure the intention of an enemy that comes down in a parachute in their back yard. Their real responsibility is to shoot first if not Isreali and ask later. In joint flight manuvers the Israeli Pilots in the Israeli built jets went up against US pilots in F116s and though supposedly up against the best of the best they had a "kill" ratio of 5 to 1. For every simulated hit on them they had simulated a hit of five US top pilots flying the most sophisticated fighter made in the world at the time. Arab Air forces run from IAF pilots or they die, that is always been the only choices they had and still will have even 20 years from now. Look, it's obvious that Israeli pilots are the best in the middle east and perhaps the best in the world, but they're NOT as good as you think they are either. I'll give you some examples of why they're not as good as you think they are. In the Yom Kippur War even Syria shot down AT LEAST 36 Israeli Air Force aircraft in a SINGLE DAY. You are very correct, however do you care to mention the Syian losses that same day? How about that was the only day they had that airforce intact. They lost over 90 percent of their entire airforce and pilots in that huge engagment. The Syrian Airforce was seen heading toward Israel so Israel Scrambled its Norther Fighters that were designated as ready. That is only about 50 percent of them. The US Navy would call them the Alert Aircraft which would be manned and ready if needed. Israelis at that time due to the war, had 1/2 the pilots in the planes ready to be scrambled at a moments notice. Syria had sent their entire Airforce thus outnumbering the Israelis at first contact about 4 to 1. Israel did loose a total of 36 aircraft in that battle but under 30 Syrian Planes limped back to home and not one ever penetrated Israeli Airspace, their real objective. That meant the IAF shot down 12 - 15 planes for every one they lost in that battle. No one rates an airforce facing larger numbers by all aircraft returning safely. That is rediculous. Next you will be saying the US army is a joke because they loose men every day in Iraq still. Get realistic, best never meant no losses and never meant at time high losses, it means what the *final* result is. During the Battle of Britain the RAF one night only could get up five fighters who each shot down over 7 enemy aircraft and all those RAF planes were lost. Who won in the end of the Battle of Britain, not the Luftwaffa that is certain. The RAF won that battle by no matter what getting what they still could in the air and inflicting heavier losses on the Germans than they suffered. Those are nice stats, but they still don't prove that Israel is as good as you said in your original post. If Israel was as good as you say they are, then why did they lose over 100 aircraft and over 800 tanks in the Yom Kippur War? Israel only had a population of about 3 million back then and was the size of New Jersey or maybe even smaller back then. Over 100 aircraft and over 800 tanks are just too many losses for a country as small as Israel to sustain and still win a war. Israel deserves an ASTERISK for winning the Yom Kippur War. It was Operatinal Nickel Grass(A MASSIVE US resupplying effort to replace destroyed Israeli equipment) that saved Israel's butt and allowed Israel to win the Yom Kippur War That's the whole reason that Sadat made peace with Israel. Sadat proved to himself that Israel was beatable, but he also discovered that EVEN if he did well enough to beat Israel, he would still lose because of Operation Nickel Grass or other similar operations in the future. ere were 23 SA-6 Sam Batteries in Syria before the start of the Yom Kippur War, and at the END OF THE YOM KIPPUR WAR, the Israeli Air Force was only able to take out 3 of those 23 SA-6 batteries at a great loss of Israeli Aircraft. Yet they used that to learn they went against better in the Egyptian Theater, Syria was a holding action, get it. They were like a thorn not the main target of the IAF, Egypt that had recrossed the Cannal was more a threat. However, the Israelis only targetted a total of SAM Batteries in Syria that their intellegence told them correctly left Damascus open to air-raids and they did send in bombers once near the end of the war and hit the Syrian verison of the Penatgon killing all the leading stradigists of the Syrian Military in one blow. It is not always how many but which ground targets you take out. Egypt posed a larger threat in the early part of the war that is why the number of IAF planes in the Norhtern Command was so low as to not equal the Syrians in number as they had before the war and would have gone one to one with even a higher kill ratio. The Israeli Pilots could not have the luxury of cover of a wingman while setting up their shot, the Syrians could. Had the Command not sent 1/2 the planes from Norther Israel on day one of the war to fight the stronger better positioned enemy, they would have not even lost the numbers that they had. Wingmen stay with their lead, protecting them from being set up for a shot. And if the lead misses they switch off and the wingman takes lead and tries again. Best shot on a Jet in air to air is from the rear or about 20 degrees off straigth on. A wingman's job is to watch for such a set up and break it up if needed. The IDF GROUND FORCES did take out a few more of those SA-6 batteries, but the Israeli Air Force certainly was NOT up to the challenge of taking on the SA-6 during the Yom Kippur War. They never tried sir. I ABSOLUTELY TOTALLY disagree with that statement. The Israeli Air Force DID TRY and FAIL at trying to take out the SA-6 Sam Batteries, but they suffered GREAT losses and basically decided that the IAF wasn't up to the job of taking out the SA-6 and left that job up to the IDF GROND forces. Out of ALL the weapons systems and aircraft ever used in all the wars Israel has ever been involved in, the SA-6 during the Yom Kippur War had the MOST IMPRESSIVE KILL RATIOS against the Israeli Air Force ever achieved. It was NOT till Israel recieved F-15s and F-16 during the 80s that Israel was able to tame the SA-6 in Lebanon, and the SA-6 was OLD technology by then anyway. Israel doesn't have aircraft like B-2s, F-117 Nighthawks, or F-22 Raptors and that's why top of the line SAMs are the Israeli Air Force's Achilles Hell and have probably always been the Israeli Air Force's Achilles Hell. BTW, here's proof that the Israeli Air Force did indeed go after the SA-6 Sam Batteries but did very poorly at dealing with the SA-6 during the Yom Kippur War. http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaver...8/phantom2.htm "Egypt entered the war with 106 SAM batteries, while Syria had a further 23. On the morning of Sunday, October 7th, a massive attack was about to be launched against Egyptian air bases but it was called off in view of the desperate situation on the Golan Heights. Under operation "Doogman 5B" (model 5B) the IAF launched dozens of its F-4s and A-4s against the Syrian SAM array on the Heights. Having gone in with insufficient intelligence against a deadly opponent, six Phantoms were lost during that single day. With only a single SAM battery destroyed, October 7th was a resounding defeat and the IAF avoided confronting the Syrian SAMs again. By the end of the war the IAF had destroyed only 3 Syrian batteries, leaving most of the work to IDF ground forces." http://home.att.net/~jbaugher1/f4_41.html On October 7, Phantoms launched an attack against Syrian SAM sites, but the Syrian forces were now equipped with the new Soviet-built SA-6 Gainful mobile surface-to-air missile. Syrian forces were also equipped with ZSU-23 mobile radar-controlled anti-aircraft artillery. The SAM-6/ZSU-23 combination proved deadly. No less than six Phantoms and thirty A-4 Skyhawks were lost in this single day. Very few of their pilots manage to escape by parachute. At one time, the Israelis were losing three out of every five aircraft they were sending over Golan. These losses were clearly unsupportable, and Chief of Staff Elazer was forced to temporarily abandon air strikes over Golan in mid-afternoon. The SA-6 was an unpleasant surprise to the Israelis. Israeli electronic countermeasures had been designed to counter the earlier SA-2 and SA-3 radar-guided missiles that had been encountered by the Americans in Vietnam, but these techniques were useless against the SA-6. Earlier Soviet SAMs had used command guidance throughout the entire flight of the missile, but the SA-6 homed in on CW energy reflected from the illuminated aircraft for the final approach to the target. The Straight Flush radar that guided the SA-6 operated over a much wider bandwidth than did the earlier Soviet radars, and used D-band for illumination and G, H, and I/J-bands for initial acquisition and initial launch guidance. The Straight Flush codename is an apparent reference to the five frequencies used by the system. In the semi-active homing mode, the SA-6's homing head and rearward-facing reference antenna receive CW command signals in the I-band. Beacon signals from the missile are in G and H band. The SA-6 apparently also had an alternative infrared-homing system, but I am not sure if it was actually used. The early part of the SA-6's flight was guided by radar, but the Straight Flush radar operated over a much wider bandwidth than that of the earlier Soviet missiles. The radar ranged over three separate frequencies during search, acquisition, tracking, and guidance. Before the war began, not enough was known about these frequencies or about the ability of the missile to switch between frequencies while in flight to throw off jamming transmissions. The ALR-36 radar warning receiver was of little use in picking up these radar signals, since these emissions were outside the band in which the ALR-36 was designed to operate. Consequently, Israeli aircraft found it very difficult to detect a SA-6 launch, and even more difficult to jam the missile while in flight." Did you read the quote where it said "October 7th was a resounding defeat and the IAF avoided confronting the Syrian SAMs again." The simple truth that the SA-6 scared Israeli pilots during the Yom Kippur War like nothing has scared them before or since. There's no shame in the Israeli Air Force deciding not to take on the SA-6, it was in fact the smart thing to do. The Israeli Air Force kicked the Syrian and Egyptian Airforce's butts in the Yom Kippur War, but the SA-6 kicked the Israeli Airforce's Butt in the Yom Kippur War. They took out only enough to open Damascus up for the air attack on the building all the militiary leadership of Syria were at. They then brought down that building that killed every high ranking Officer and all the real experience of how to adjust to conditions during a war. Read some more on the descission making during that war of the Israeli Command. Here is some simple facts on that. 1) Egypt was the primary enemy, and had to be stopped first and formost. 2) Until the War with Egypt was won or in total Israeli Control only a holding action would be fought with Syria. They would do all they could to keep Syrian Forces from over-running the Golan and to keep the large airforce of Syria from attacking Israel Proper. 3) The SAMs were known about and on the Sinai they were the largest threat as the IAF would be most active over that airspace. In Syria until the Egyptian threat was elimanated to the West, was not a large concern. They new the exact posistions of the Syrian Batteries. They knew it would be costly to take each out and decided to only open a single coredor at the time to be able to hit targets of Command Value in Damascus Proper. They took out which meant that the overlap capability for defending Damascus was no longer there on one route. 4) The Egyptians had the Newest SAM batteries that were usually not let out of Russia. They were also manned by Soviet Technitians not Egyptian. The IAF did take heavy casualites on thier first run in with them, but came up with better tactics, Same used by the USA in Vietnam by the A6-Intruders. A plane would electronicallly make itself the most important target and as soon as targeting radar painted them a special missile was fired that locked on to the battery. If the missile got off anyway the plane did a series of manouvers many times taking the SAM (SA-7) back to an Egyptian target and by flying low enough and then lifting in an agagy-4 climb at the last moment the SAM hit what the plane had passed over. They also started using flares and attaching baffles to the engines to hide the heat from the exahaust. Later they were found to have refined it when they took otu SA-9 sites in the Becka Valley only loosing a few drones. It may be of little importance but Israel was going to be on full alert that day. The US "sold them a bill of goods" saying that the Egyptians and Syrians were not going to attack and the SA-7s were mock ups. So Israels only real mistake was to take the word of the Liars in Washington DC and Langley West Va. Here's another example, I've read on several different military sites that there were a dozen or more Pakistani Air Force Pilots who went over to arab countries during the 6 Day War and the Yom Kippur War to see how well they could do against the Isreli Air Force since they had already racked up great kill ratios against the Indians. They wanted to see "how good they really were" as it were against a great air force like the Israelis. They claim that these Pakistanis shot down at least 10 Israeli air craft in the 6 day war and at least 1 Israeli aircraft in the Yom That would mean they are the only ones that shot down Israeli Aircraft in the 6 day war. LOL. Kippur war without the Israeli Air Force even shooting down 1 of these Pakistani pilots. It's NOT just the Pakistanis who claim this, even this Indian Air Force historian guy who made this Indian Air Force website claims that. SO then they claim since the IAF only lists 11 planes lost, one in a bad landing BTW, that all the planes shot down was by Packestani Pilots. Have The Israelis claim that Israel lost 10 planes during the 6 day war, I'm sure the arabs claim something else. The truth is probably somewhere in between. I wouldn't say it's written in stone that Israel lost 1o planes during the 6 day war, it could just as easily have been 15 or 20. some more that I can laugh at. BTW I was in that War, and a relative of mine was a flight section leader and was one of those planes hit but ejected back over Israeli Held positions. He was injured but to good to be kept out so he ended the time in the main Command and Communcations Center. I repeat *only* 10 IAF Combat Planes were lost to Enemy fire and one of those pilots was hit from the ground, not the air on a napalm run against Egyptian Tanks that were part of an Armored Column. I guess that was a Packistani Pilot as well. In the Yom Kippur war, a little bit more believable except what front was he fighting on? Syrian perhaps in that one engagement, after that there were no more air to air fights the Syrian Planes that survived just stood down totally. So unless he was part of that then I doubt it as well. Here's a quote from the Indian site that may clear things up for you. These are all "CONFIRMED KILLS" according to the Indian Air Force guy. http://jaganpvs.tripod.com/pakpilots.htm#azam "Saiful Azam is a not heard of much in aircombat. Azam has the unique distinction of having kills against airforces of two different countries. as a young flying officer during the 65 Conflict, Saiful Azam managed to shoot down an IAF Gnat on Sept 18th, a rarity as such the Gnat was seldom lost in Aircombat. his victim Fg Off V Mayadev ejected to become a POW. Azam participated two years later in the Arab Israeli conflict of June 1967. deputed to the Royal Jordanian Air Force, flying Hunters, the RJAF Hunters were flown out to the Iraqi Airbase of H-3 in an attempt to put them out of range of Israeli Air Force. It was here he accomplished a unique feat, flying in a Hawker Hunter as a No.2 His formation intercepted an Israeli formation of Four Vautours and Two Mirage IIIs. One of the Mirage IIIs was flown by Capt. Gideon Dror. Dror shot down Azam's Wingman, but himself fell to Azam's Guns. Dror ejected to be taken POW. Moments later, Azam intercepted the formation of four Vantour Bombers and bought down one of them flown by Capt Golan, who ejected. . Azam had earlier bought down a Super Mystere the previous day over Jordan. Azam , being a Bengali did not fly in the 71 conflict. In the final reckoning Azam ties up with Alam in terms of kills, but his tally has a range of kills including the enviable credit of a Mach 2 Mirage III Fighter." http://www.scramble.nl/pk.htm Here's a quote from the New Zealand site about the 6 day war. "The Six-Day War between Israel and a number of Arab countries in 1967. During this conflict the PAF sent personnel to Egypt, Jordan and Syria to support the Arabs in their battle against the Israelis. PAF pilots managed to shoot down ten Israeli aircraft, including Mirages, Mystères and Vautours, without losses on their own side. The PAF pilots operated with Egyptian, Jordanese and Iraqi combat aircraft." Here's a quote from the New Zealand site about the Yom Kippur War. "Yom Kippur War, October 1973 During this war 16 PAF pilots volunteered to leave for the Middle East in order to support Egypt and Syria but by the time they arrived Egypt had already agreed on a cease-fire. Syria remained in a state of war against Israel so the PAF pilots became instructors there and formed the A-flight of 67 Squadron at Dumayr AB. Later on PAF pilot Flt. Lt. Sattar Alvi was honoured by the Syrian government." If he was on the Egyptian front and said he shot down a IAF Combat Jet, then what day of the war did he do it. The Egyptians used their airforce only 2 days out of that war. The first day to support their ground assault and the next to last day of the war when the SA-7s got taken out of the picture and Israelis were buring the dead Soviets in unmarked graves so not to cause WWWIII over them having combattants in the war. Nixon would have let loose SAC which he had up the entire war to prevent that from being done. Had Israelis put on a huge show and tell and not held that secret till about 2 years ago, Nixon may have sent some of the bombers or missiles in and bye bye world. IDF simply took the IDs of those Soviets killed in the taking out of the SA-7s and then simply buried them right by the reckage of the once command center for the battery. The IDF had the Egptian Army trapped and the Syrians on the run, their airforce in ruins in both those nations. Again it is not just numbers it is the results. Do you have any ideas of how many American B17 crews died in that bobming campaign, but the mission was accomplished while the Egyptian and Syrians Missions were not the Israeli Missions all ended with the final defeats of both enemies on the field. Had not the US Stepped in and told Israel to let supplies into the trapped Egyptain Forces they would all have died with out a shot fired in another two days. Nothing stood between them and Ciaro and that could have meant Israeli Troops and guns hitting that city and cutting all escape off and putting a gun to Saddam's head and demanding Unconditional Surrender. Israeli Tanks the next day were shelling the outskirts of Damascus. IDF Airborn had taken all the roads leading to any escape for them. The plans accoridng to the Dyan Memoirs was to start dismantiling Damscus moving in for the kill there and to take Ciaro and let the Egyptian Army trapped with no drinking water left to die of thirst. That was the mission and they accomplished it for all intent and purposes. As to Egyptian Pilot losses they IAF shot down killing Saddat's own brother with his entire flight that last day they flew. Again the ratios went skyrocketting since the SAMs were no longer in action. It is the final result that counts not the numbers unless the numbers aproach 100 percent. In every war Israel started with fewer planes and pilots then their enemy, yet in the end they always come out on top. Read some more real history by those that fought there and learn. Pakestani Claims only say the Syrians and Egyptians had no kills at all. LOL. And how did they get thier planes there without the US seeing it and documenting it. LOL again. Just more Mulsim and Indian (they also lie about Israel 1000s of times) lies. Indians lie about Israel infavor of Pakistanis? That's about the funniest things I've ever heard. It's true that back 50 or 60 years ago the liberal Indian Hindus like Gandhi suppored the Palestinians and Gandhi even opposed to the right to create Israel. That really doesn't matter now though since it's the 21st century. India is Israel's 2nd BEST ally. Indian Hindus are the MOST pro Israel people on earth after Americans. It's pretty far fetched to say that an Indian Hindu who's an Indian Air Force historian or something would make up stuff in favor of Pakistan and against Israel. Look at this Indian guy's website ( http://jaganpvs.tripod.com/ ). It should be obvious that he's a die hard Indian Air Force fan, and he's probably a fan and friend of Israel as well. http://jaganpvs.tripod.com/pakpilots.htm Here's the homepage of this Indian site. http://jaganpvs.tripod.com/ This website from New Zealand claims that Pakistani pilots shot down 10 Israeli aircraft in the 6 day war, and at least 1 Israeli aircraft in the Yom Kippur War. http://www.scramble.nl/pk.htm Here's the homepage of this site from New Zealand. http://www.scramble.nl/ I also did do a google search to find out what kind of kill ratios Soviet Pilots had against the Israelis when Soviet pilots flew for Arab Air Forces, but I didn't find anything. BTW, as even if Israeli pilots are the best in the world, they still can't be in the same league as the Americans or Europeans because of the number of and the quality of equipment that the Europeans and Americans have. I'd even have to put the Spanish Air Force above the Israeli Air Force when the Spanish get all their Eurofighter Typhoons(they have already got their first batch of Eurofighter Typhoons I understand). No matter how good an Israeli pilot in an F-15I or F-16I would be, he/she just CAN'T compete with an American Pilot in an F-22 Raptor or a European pilot in a Eurofighter Typhoon. The Israelis just don't have stuff even close to as good as the Meteor BVR air to air missile for example. Most of Western Europe will have these missiles on their fighter planes soon. -- MattA ?subject=HepatitusC-Objectives Matt's Hep-C Story web pages are back at a home. No more drop down ads to get in your way. http://mywebpages.comcast.net/matta00 Truth about Howard Aubrey AKA madyan67: http://www.geocities.com/lord_haha_libeler/ -- MattA ?subject=HepatitusC-Objectives Matt's Hep-C Story web pages are back at a home. No more drop down ads to get in your way. http://mywebpages.comcast.net/matta00 Truth about Howard Aubrey AKA madyan67: http://www.geocities.com/lord_haha_libeler/ Same reason the US it turns out was loosing 2 - 3 aircraft a day over North Vietnam and sometimes more than that. No nation had faced the newest SAMS yet and that is how they got shot down in the early days of the war. Every time they went up against the enemy Planes it was the enemy that came up the looser. Later they came up tactics that worked against those SAMs that were the cover for the Ground forces and in the end their loses dropped to a lower level and they drove the Egyptian and Syrian Airforces totally from the sky. If they were not that good howcome it was only IAF planes flying by the time of the ceace fire? They took on two airforces each with as many aircraft as Israel had (that means 2 times the numbers) and Egypt had soviet Technitians manning the then latest SA version of SAM Missile Batteries that covered the entire area. Being best is not always about numbers of casualties but more about the who wins the final battles and the war because of the way they fought. The IAF cleared the skies of the enemy air power, took out just enough of the SAM Sites to create openings. They in fact bombed the Port of Alexander the second day of that war. Tell me how long before Doolittle bombed the Japanese after Pearl Harbor? You have blinders on as the you keep repeating to everyone your casualty figures and many here tell you so what? Israeli Pilots for the most part managed to eject. Unlike the Islamic Counter Parts they did their best to bet behind their lines and eject when to severly damaged. Where was that Egyptian Air Force when the Israelis built thier pontoon Bridges accross the Canal and crossed over it with their men and tanks so nicely lined up for the Egyptians. What little was left of them was not flying anymore in reserve to put up one last battle for Ciaro that is where they were, to protect their Saddat and his Ministers. Where were they when the Egyptian Army was being forced with thier backs to the canal (rancid sea water) and boxed in on the other three sides if the IAF was so bad as you want us to falsly think? They stayed out of the sky knowing to fly was to die for them. IAF controlled the skies at that point. Yes they lost 100 planes but not 100 pilots 28 of them were back up again the next day in another aircraft. 32 were hospilalized for common things that happen to many pilots when the eject from thier aircraft, burns, broken arms and legs and the like. Many were in fact taken prisoner but some of them were liberated within an hour by IDF Point units (furthest out units in front of the advancing troops). In all less then 15 percent of the pilots died. Which means they lived to fly again if needed. If I were you I would not look to the past performances of the IDF, but what since then they proved by actions capable of doing. There are very few pilots that flew in the Yom Kippur war that would be used as pilots today. How about that presission raid on the Iraqi Nuclear Facilities within a block of 3 embassies that did not get a scratch. And that was not with "smart bombs" at all that was with Iron Bombs, dumb ones at that. There are at least 100 missions that they flew in the M.E. in the last couple of years. In Lebanon, within the Becka Valley where the syrians put up SAM sites, they took them out without so much as one lost plane. And the weapons they used were 100 percent Israeli made. The planes were US built but the smart drones, the electronics to make the small drone look like a fighter-bomber to radar and the missies they used to destroy the Command Center of the battery was all designed and made in Israel. The US in actuallity is buying dronnes from Israel. Get the idea yet? -- MattA ?subject=HepatitusC-Objectives Matt's Hep-C Story web pages are back at a home. No more drop down ads to get in your way. http://mywebpages.comcast.net/matta00 Truth about Howard Aubrey AKA madyan67: http://www.geocities.com/lord_haha_libeler/ |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
No, it's certainly not a big deal to move text down. The fact is that
many of the messages I respond to on this NG are voluminous loads of crap that I usually replace (to save bandwidth) with a simple: Snip Posting at the bottom does make sense if one wants and/or expects others to read an entire thread chronologically. However, soc.culture.palestine is so full of morons (and I recognize that I may be one of them) that most things should only be posted/read once, under penalty of loss of brain cells. Indeed, many things here would be best typed by the author-moron and totally deleted before posting. I don't know if the same applies to the other affected NG. On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 13:38:16 GMT, "Gord Beaman" ) wrote: (Richard Cranium) wrote: Sorry Silvey. THIS is where the cursor appears in Agent when a message is opened for reply. You're quite correct, BUT...is it such an onerous task to move it down to the bottom of the text that you want to quote and start typing your reply there?...let me know if you don't know how to do that and I'll send detailed instructions... -- -Gord. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Cranium wrote:
When the reply posting is far more interesting than the original post, top posting is not only acceptable, it is preferable. That's why some newsreaders automatically place the response at the top of the thread. It makes it considerably more difficult to follow a thread. The only thing proper bottom posting requires is trimming quotations to one or two paragraphs max. Then you have an excellent, quite readable post. Most top posters just reply to the comment and don't bother to trim anything off the bottom. They add a tremendous amount of unnecessary bandwidth to any newsgroup. I prefer that I be able to read both the reference and the reply without having to scroll excessively. I don't see that as too much to want. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN http://www.mortimerschnerd.com |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Well if a Schnerd says it, I'm sure that Mr. McCarthy agrees.
Therefore, I disagree and will top post this response in opposition. BTW - did you really bang Candace?? On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 11:39:52 -0400, "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" wrote: Richard Cranium wrote: When the reply posting is far more interesting than the original post, top posting is not only acceptable, it is preferable. That's why some newsreaders automatically place the response at the top of the message. It makes it considerably more difficult to follow a thread. The only thing proper bottom posting requires is trimming quotations to one or two paragraphs max. Then you have an excellent, quite readable post. Most top posters just reply to the comment and don't bother to trim anything off the bottom. They add a tremendous amount of unnecessary bandwidth to any newsgroup. I prefer that I be able to read both the reference and the reply without having to scroll excessively. I don't see that as too much to want. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN http://www.mortimerschnerd.com |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Cranium wrote:
Well if a Schnerd says it, I'm sure that Mr. McCarthy agrees. Therefore, I disagree and will top post this response in opposition. BTW - did you really bang Candace?? Of course. I left her smoking. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN http://www.mortimerschnerd.com |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"Mortimer Schnerd, RN" wrote:
Richard Cranium wrote: Well if a Schnerd says it, I'm sure that Mr. McCarthy agrees. Therefore, I disagree and will top post this response in opposition. BTW - did you really bang Candace?? Of course. I left her smoking. A cigarette one assumes? -- -Gord. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Gord Beaman wrote:
BTW - did you really bang Candace?? Of course. I left her smoking. A cigarette one assumes? It would be ungentlemanly of me to elaborate. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN http://www.mortimerschnerd.com |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Arie Kazachin wrote:
In message - "Matt A.00 01 is Matthew Ackerman" writes: Arie Kazachin wrote: [self snip. I know what I wrote] The IDF intelegence deny that happened as the CIA asked them not to disclose it. The world was afraid that Nixon had gone off the deep end and would use SAC Bombers already airborn 24 hours a day and fire the misiles in the Silos at the Russians as he warned them he would if they did what you say. There is no declasified information on Russian Pilots flying missions for the Arab side to this day. There are of course the rhumors that it happened but no IAF pilot, no Arab Pilot, and no Soviet Pilot has come forward about such to this day. Stop inventing stories and reporting unprovable things. Bottom [snip. Lost patience to correct what's below after the line above. ] Despite your baseless claims, it had LONG SINCE beed declassified and appeared in books and papers. The book "The sky is not the limit" had been printed in 1990 and it includes this battle description, so the declassification came before 1990. Out of the 5 downed MiG-21s 3 were downed by Mirage-IIICJ and two by F-4E. The pilots of Mirages we Asher Snir, "Avik", Yiftah Spector and the pilots of F-4Es we Aviem Sela and Avihu Ben-Nun. Find the pilots and ask them :-) or do some "googling". You'll also probably get it at "http://www.iaf.org.il/" somewhere under "history". Unfortunately I can't access it at home - the site designers so heavily "optimized for MS IE" that my Netscape can't show it correctly. ************************************************** ************************** ** * Arie Kazachin, Israel, e-mail: * ************************************************** ************************** ** NOTE: before replying, leave only letters in my domain-name. Sorry, SPAM trap. ___ .__/ | | O / _/ / | | I HAVE NOWHERE ELSE TO GO !!! | | | | | | | /O\ | _ \_______[|(.)|]_______/ | * / \ o ++ O ++ o | | | | | \ \_) \ | \ | \ | \ | \ | \ | \ | \_| Where did it say the downed Mig Pilots were Soviets. That was the issue that you posed and not what planes were involved. Is that why you simply snipped out your previous words and said you knew what you posted. Should I put back those quotes I retain the posts I download for the highest number of days one can enter in that option on OE, I think that is 9,999 days. My sent copies of all posts is automaticaly kept and I could find it there as well till I decide it is too old to bother keeping usually about 2 years for most posts and 3 for business emails sent out from here. I Also if I deem it important enough flag the sent message and my cleanup is done by a 2 rules in OE. Rule Sent CLean 1: In SENT folder if Message is flagged Stop executing message rules. Rule Sent CLean 2: In SENT folder if message older than 742 days Delete Message stop executing rules. Real easy to keep long enough and self clean every time I run OE. So I unlike you do know what I responded to and you seem to forgotten. As to 1990 My MS is is Comp Sci, but I hold an associates in Visual arts (NY School of Vissual Arts) and a BA in History. Every professor would have called 1990 still recently. The book was written and published (I do have a copy of it) in 1990, the source is documented and if you check the documentation out, the second step of researching a topic. That is one reads it in a footnoted or endnoted source and then goes to the source that the author used. You would find it was infact declasified only the prior year 1989. A source is in Historical Terms considered new or recent till it has had 20 years of reviewing for any mistakes by other historians. Now that would take that off the "recently" list in 2009 not before as I was taught. There are books out on the Battle of Britain written 10 years after the war using documents that were declasified rigfht after the War. Later many mistakes as to pertant facts still came out that proved the conculusions of those Historians wrong. I.E. the exact fighter capacity of the RAF at the time of the Munich Conference. The first set of documents indicated 20 times the number of fighters then were really there and usefull. That document came out just after the end of the war. 15 years later a military historian after talking with mechanics at various air fields at that time, found a flaw in how the numbers were generated. The document counted old WW I Biplanes and unarmed trainers as if they were viable fighters. Planes being scrapped at that time were also counted by the orders of the Air Marshal of the time. He believed their were Nazi Agents that had access to the documents and wanted them to think Britain was a lot better armed and ready than it was. That is why any good historian will 'think of anything available for less than 20 years as recent. Real good researching Historians usually leave anything of the last 20 years as "current events" as it is too knew to uncover the historical parts of it other then at the most trivial levels.' - Dr. Buchsbaumb U. Of Prague and Pace University after 1969. I used to have some of his books and attended 3 of his classes. He escaped from Hiltler and worked in British Intellegence during WWII and returned to his home in 1945 taught at Prague and during that famous spring of freedom published 2 books he had hidden from the Communists then as they fell to the Warsaw Pack was away on a lecture in London. He and his wife stayed out of that country and came to the USA. Apon my return and finishing Physical Rehab for the wounds in action in '67 I attended that school (Pace U) at their Pleasantville Campus (Westchester County NY) where he was teaching. He was one of my proffessors and my advisor. He gave "F" on papers that had too many sources under 20 years old. No topic that came into being during that 20 year window was ever accepted. I will abide by his definition of recent not yours, thank you. -- MattA ?subject=HepatitusC-Objectives Matt's Hep-C Story web pages are back at a home. No more drop down ads to get in your way. http://mywebpages.comcast.net/matta00 Truth about Howard Aubrey AKA madyan67: http://www.geocities.com/lord_haha_libeler/ |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
In message - "Matt A.00 01 is Matthew
Ackerman" writes: Arie Kazachin wrote: [self snip. I know what I wrote] The IDF intelegence deny that happened as the CIA asked them not to disclose it. The world was afraid that Nixon had gone off the deep end and would use SAC Bombers already airborn 24 hours a day and fire the misiles in the Silos at the Russians as he warned them he would if they did what you say. There is no declasified information on Russian Pilots flying missions for the Arab side to this day. There are of course the rhumors that it happened but no IAF pilot, no Arab Pilot, and no Soviet Pilot has come forward about such to this day. Stop inventing stories and reporting unprovable things. Bottom [snip. Lost patience to correct what's below after the line above. ] Despite your baseless claims, it had LONG SINCE beed declassified and appeared in books and papers. The book "The sky is not the limit" had been printed in 1990 and it includes this battle description, so the declassification came before 1990. Out of the 5 downed MiG-21s 3 were downed by Mirage-IIICJ and two by F-4E. The pilots of Mirages we Asher Snir, "Avik", Yiftah Spector and the pilots of F-4Es we Aviem Sela and Avihu Ben-Nun. Find the pilots and ask them :-) or do some "googling". You'll also probably get it at "http://www.iaf.org.il/" somewhere under "history". Unfortunately I can't access it at home - the site designers so heavily "optimized for MS IE" that my Netscape can't show it correctly. ************************************************** **************************** * Arie Kazachin, Israel, e-mail: * ************************************************** **************************** NOTE: before replying, leave only letters in my domain-name. Sorry, SPAM trap. ___ .__/ | | O / _/ / | | I HAVE NOWHERE ELSE TO GO !!! | | | | | | | /O\ | _ \_______[|(.)|]_______/ | * / \ o ++ O ++ o | | | | | \ \_) \ | \ | \ | \ | \ | \ | \ | \_| |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
Impact of Eurofighters in the Middle East | Quant | Military Aviation | 164 | October 4th 03 04:33 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Israeli air force to overfly Auschwitz | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 1 | September 3rd 03 10:12 PM |
Air Force announces acquisition management reorganization | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | August 21st 03 09:16 PM |