If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Do I fly?! Don't be a wise ass...why do you think they call it
"weathervaning"? What does a weathervane do? It turns the "weathervane" into the relative wind. An airplane is a weathervane too and the wind can and does turn an airplane into the relative wind. Definition: "weathervaning". Kobra "CASK829" wrote in message ... The tail does not know what direction the wind is blowing if the airplane is in the air. So therefore it DOES NOT push the nose into the wind. Do You fly? It's from the wind striking the vertical stabilizer and pushing the nose into the wind. Kobra |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Robert Moore" wrote in message . 7... (Koopas Ly) wrote You'd also use some right rudder to keep the nose straight and prevent it from "weathervaning". Is this "weathervaning effect" caused by your leftward relative motion due to the left bank OR by the rightward crosswind ITSELF? There is NO weathervaning effect until the wheels touch the ground. Banking an airplane (putting a wing down) causes it to turn. You use opposite rudder simply to keep it from turning due to the bank. It's sort of the opposite of weathervaning. The vertical stab will normally keep the tail in line with the aircraft (coordinated flight). Using the rudder will force it out of line (and in alignment with the direction of travel on the ground). |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Roger Long" om writes:
As far as the plane is concerned, there is no such thing as wind until the wheels touch the ground. Unless the wind changes too fast (i.e. sudden gusts, wind shear, etc.). All the best, David |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Robert Moore writes:
There is NO weathervaning effect until the wheels touch the ground. Banking an airplane (putting a wing down) causes it to turn. You use opposite rudder simply to keep it from turning due to the bank. In flight and on the ground (even tied down), the aircraft tries to weathervane into its relative wind, which is aircraft-referenced rather than ground-referenced. That's why the plane turns when you bank the wings (the vstab makes the plane weathervane towards the sideslip). Only when the plane is not moving or moving very slowly on the ground is the relative wind from roughly the same direction as the (static) wind that the windsock sees. All the best, David |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Duniho" writes:
Actually, in some aircraft, banking an airplane causes it to turn in a direction *opposite* of the bank. Rudder is necessary in a turn, to make sure the turn is coordinated and is as efficient as possible. Many airplanes, without the use of rudder, will simply slip sideways without any change in heading at all. That would require extremely draggy ailerons. I know that some planes turn sloppy without rudder, but what planes don't change heading at all? Gliders? All the best, David |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
David Megginson wrote: That would require extremely draggy ailerons. I know that some planes turn sloppy without rudder, but what planes don't change heading at all? Maules, for one. Give mine aileron and no rudder, and she will quite happily fly sideways on the same heading. Something about "adverse yaw"? George Patterson If you're not part of the solution, you can make a lot of money prolonging the problem. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
That's what I said. Did you read the whole thing?
-- Roger Long David Megginson wrote in message ... "Roger Long" om writes: As far as the plane is concerned, there is no such thing as wind until the wheels touch the ground. Unless the wind changes too fast (i.e. sudden gusts, wind shear, etc.). All the best, David |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"G.R. Patterson III" writes:
Maules, for one. Give mine aileron and no rudder, and she will quite happily fly sideways on the same heading. Something about "adverse yaw"? At what bank angle, and for how long? With very draggy ailerons, I can imagine that there might be one bank angle where drag from the aileron on the high wing exactly counteracted the weathervaning tendency of the plane, but it would be amazing if that were true of every bank angle up to 30 deg (for example). All the best, David |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"Roger Long" om writes:
That's what I said. Did you read the whole thing? I thought I had, but I missed that part. Apologies. All the best, David |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Duniho" wrote
Of course there is. There is "weathervaning" any time the relative wind is not parallel to the longitudinal axis. But I think that the discussion was weathervaning into the actual wind, not the relative wind. If I bank away from the wind, does the airplane then weathervane into or away from the wind? The only thing that can cause the airplane to weathervane into the actual wind is for the wheels to be in contact with the ground. Without the pivot, a weathervane doesn't weathervane. Bob |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|