If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A380 Landing in LAX
Anyone notice what seemed to me to be rather large deflections of the
rudder during landing at LAX the other day? The video is on CNN -- can't provide direct link so go to CNN video site and search for "Gigantic jet arrives in U.S.". Was there a significant crosswind that morning? On touchdown, the A380 appears to turn a bit and then recover. I believe the 380 gear is designed to land somewhat crabbed on a pivot and then turn straight. Comments? Bob |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
A380 Landing in LAX
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Bob Clough wrote: Anyone notice what seemed to me to be rather large deflections of the rudder during landing at LAX the other day? The video is on CNN -- can't provide direct link so go to CNN video site and search for "Gigantic jet arrives in U.S.". Was there a significant crosswind that morning? On touchdown, the A380 appears to turn a bit and then recover. I believe the 380 gear is designed to land somewhat crabbed on a pivot and then turn straight. Nope. No real crosswinds at all. the video on CBS2.com (CBS LA Affiliate) has ATC comms on it, and when MSN101 checked in, Tower reported winds 280 at 4. So for all intents, winds were calm. They definitely turned to recover it, and it was dramatic on the CBS2 video. I think they just missed the runway centerline and corrected to get back onto that. Just with the size of that beast, any correction like that is going to look drastic. Here's the URL to the video: BL. - -- Brad Littlejohn | Email: Unix Systems Administrator, | Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! | http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGAsaVyBkZmuMZ8L8RAj47AJ0aqxnqgJQ17k+owA3W5C U+rXDqagCcDFjQ MEfLtsf7eVrBXYN3iyeHeOU= =e6Ps -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
A380 Landing in LAX
A Guy Called Tyketto wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bob Clough wrote: Anyone notice what seemed to me to be rather large deflections of the rudder during landing at LAX the other day? The video is on CNN -- can't provide direct link so go to CNN video site and search for "Gigantic jet arrives in U.S.". Was there a significant crosswind that morning? On touchdown, the A380 appears to turn a bit and then recover. I believe the 380 gear is designed to land somewhat crabbed on a pivot and then turn straight. Nope. No real crosswinds at all. the video on CBS2.com (CBS LA Affiliate) has ATC comms on it, and when MSN101 checked in, Tower reported winds 280 at 4. So for all intents, winds were calm. They definitely turned to recover it, and it was dramatic on the CBS2 video. I think they just missed the runway centerline and corrected to get back onto that. Just with the size of that beast, any correction like that is going to look drastic. Here's the URL to the video: There was some speculation on pprune that they may have applied reverse thrust before the nose was firmly planted. If that was the case, a little asymmetry with the reverse thrust coming on could cause the yaw. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
A380 Landing in LAX
Jim Stewart writes:
There was some speculation on pprune that they may have applied reverse thrust before the nose was firmly planted. If that was the case, a little asymmetry with the reverse thrust coming on could cause the yaw. If that's the way landings take place with the best A380 pilots around in the cockpit, what will happen when regular pilots start to fly it? That was an amazingly clumsy and rough landing, especially given that there was no obvious reason for it (heavy crosswinds or whatever). -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
A380 Landing in LAX
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Jim Stewart writes: There was some speculation on pprune that they may have applied reverse thrust before the nose was firmly planted. If that was the case, a little asymmetry with the reverse thrust coming on could cause the yaw. If that's the way landings take place with the best A380 pilots around in the cockpit, what will happen when regular pilots start to fly it? That was an amazingly clumsy and rough landing, especially given that there was no obvious reason for it (heavy crosswinds or whatever). So now you feel sufficiently knowledgable to question test pilots.. Asshole. Bertie |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
A380 Landing in LAX
Mxsmanic wrote:
Jim Stewart writes: There was some speculation on pprune that they may have applied reverse thrust before the nose was firmly planted. If that was the case, a little asymmetry with the reverse thrust coming on could cause the yaw. If that's the way landings take place with the best A380 pilots around in the cockpit, what will happen when regular pilots start to fly it? That was an amazingly clumsy and rough landing, especially given that there was no obvious reason for it (heavy crosswinds or whatever). It's only your assumption that it was a clumsy landing. I'm of the opinion that they did what they did to get it firmly planted and stopped as quickly as possible. And that's a safe landing, especially for such a high value plane. A little roughness weighed against the consequences of a overshoot and nosegear collapse is a good tradeoff. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
A380 Landing in LAX
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Jim Stewart wrote: Mxsmanic wrote: Jim Stewart writes: There was some speculation on pprune that they may have applied reverse thrust before the nose was firmly planted. If that was the case, a little asymmetry with the reverse thrust coming on could cause the yaw. If that's the way landings take place with the best A380 pilots around in the cockpit, what will happen when regular pilots start to fly it? That was an amazingly clumsy and rough landing, especially given that there was no obvious reason for it (heavy crosswinds or whatever). It's only your assumption that it was a clumsy landing. I'm of the opinion that they did what they did to get it firmly planted and stopped as quickly as possible. And that's a safe landing, especially for such a high value plane. A little roughness weighed against the consequences of a overshoot and nosegear collapse is a good tradeoff. Agreed. I also should point out that the A380 was able to make the Z highspeed, and not need the 90 that was further down at full length. So it really wasn't a question of coming in too fast or hot, either. I wonder.. with 24R being one of main arrival runways, and it also having the reverse highspeed Y (highspeed for 6L), I wonder how fast it could turn that corner to exit the runway. It would be a sharp tight turn, but one that could be tested, especially since there are more of those off of 25L, and they will also be landing on the south side too. BL. - -- Brad Littlejohn | Email: Unix Systems Administrator, | Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! | http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGAwOWyBkZmuMZ8L8RAtV2AJ9Dlfg13RFBRvGhVTjnaZ A4QyG27QCfbTWg MNgVjRxxs8Rt3oU2CvuyH5c= =Zk41 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
A380 Landing in LAX
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Jim Stewart writes: There was some speculation on pprune that they may have applied reverse thrust before the nose was firmly planted. If that was the case, a little asymmetry with the reverse thrust coming on could cause the yaw. If that's the way landings take place with the best A380 pilots around in the cockpit, what will happen when regular pilots start to fly it? That was an amazingly clumsy and rough landing, especially given that there was no obvious reason for it (heavy crosswinds or whatever). Says the idiot that has never landed a real plane EVER. -------------------------------------------- DW |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
A380 Landing in LAX
Bertie the Bunyip writes:
So now you feel sufficiently knowledgable to question test pilots. When they land that poorly, I'll question them no matter why type of pilot they are supposed to be. The whole world was watching, and the pilot screwed up (or the aircraft has a problem). -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
A380 Landing in LAX
Jim Stewart writes:
It's only your assumption that it was a clumsy landing. I'm of the opinion that they did what they did to get it firmly planted and stopped as quickly as possible. And that's a safe landing, especially for such a high value plane. A little roughness weighed against the consequences of a overshoot and nosegear collapse is a good tradeoff. Why isn't this necessary with a 747? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A380 08.jpg (1/1) | Jim Long | Aviation Photos | 0 | February 8th 07 06:04 PM |
A380 07.jpg (1/1) | Jim Long | Aviation Photos | 0 | February 8th 07 06:04 PM |
A380 06.jpg (1/1) | Jim Long | Aviation Photos | 0 | February 8th 07 06:03 PM |
A Jet Blue Aircraft Landing with Sideway Landing-Gear | Lufthansi | Piloting | 18 | July 19th 06 05:13 AM |
A Jet Blue Aircraft Landing with Sideway Landing-Gear | Hansi | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | July 17th 06 04:01 AM |