If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
... "David E. Powell" wrote in message s.com... "Paul J. Adam" wrote in message ... In message m, David E. Powell writes Very true - and the US Garand was a good gun. Easy to knock it with hindsight as overpowered and with that niggle of the eight-round clip feed, but it was a reliable, effective, durable semi-automatic rifle that led the world at the time. Yes. And the fact that the M-14/M-21, which the USMC is reissuing to riflemen, had a lot of M-1 heritage says something, too. They are? Why? The USMC (and the Army) snipers have moved beyond the M-21; as to riflemen, can't see where the M16A2 is not sufficient (and if you want to make it more effective in that 300 meter category, field an telescopic sight for it). It is called the USMC Designated Rifleman or Designated Marksman program, IIRC. It issues M-14s (scoped I think) to some volunteers/highly skilled shooters. To take on targets needing precision during small engagements to compliment unit fire and designated scout/sniper teams. There was news about it a while back. I can't see where the M-21 offers much to the rifleman in a squad that the M16A2 can't deliver (past claims of the 5.56mm not packing enough wallop being discounted as less than entirely credible). I have heard those claims regarding the 5.56 put around lately, too, but who knows? I'm just going on what I have heard, and the M-14/M-21 are certainly fine rifles at average and above average combat ranges. Brooks snip |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
"David E. Powell" wrote in message s.com... "Kevin Brooks" wrote in message ... "David E. Powell" wrote in message s.com... "Paul J. Adam" wrote in message ... In message m, David E. Powell writes Very true - and the US Garand was a good gun. Easy to knock it with hindsight as overpowered and with that niggle of the eight-round clip feed, but it was a reliable, effective, durable semi-automatic rifle that led the world at the time. Yes. And the fact that the M-14/M-21, which the USMC is reissuing to riflemen, had a lot of M-1 heritage says something, too. They are? Why? The USMC (and the Army) snipers have moved beyond the M-21; as to riflemen, can't see where the M16A2 is not sufficient (and if you want to make it more effective in that 300 meter category, field an telescopic sight for it). It is called the USMC Designated Rifleman or Designated Marksman program, IIRC. It issues M-14s (scoped I think) to some volunteers/highly skilled shooters. To take on targets needing precision during small engagements to compliment unit fire and designated scout/sniper teams. There was news about it a while back. OK. To an army puke, the term "rifleman" is indicative of the personnel who, along with a SAW gunner and a designated grenadier, make up the standard infantry squad. IIRC the Army has also been talking about increasing the number of snipers in its units--down to the company level, in addition to the current battalion level scout/snipers. But to be honest, fr the role you are describing, and if you are still talking about engagements in the 300+ meter range and below, I can't see where they are going to gain a lot from going to the M21 versus just issuing telescopic sights for the M16A2, which is plenty lethal and accurate out beyond even that range. I can't see where the M-21 offers much to the rifleman in a squad that the M16A2 can't deliver (past claims of the 5.56mm not packing enough wallop being discounted as less than entirely credible). I have heard those claims regarding the 5.56 put around lately, too, but who knows? I'm just going on what I have heard, and the M-14/M-21 are certainly fine rifles at average and above average combat ranges. They are plenty accurate in the hands of a decent shooter, and the 7.62mm gives you a longer lethal range. But if the objective is to have godd designated marksmen at the platoon or thereabouts level, I still can't see where the M16A2 is deficient. When you start looking at the ranges where the 7.62mm pays real dividends (those 500-600 meter shots), you probably really need a fair amount of specialty training to developa relaible shooter, and he is going to have to practice regularly. Having lugged the M14 a few miles, and having fired it a few times, I can vouch that the weight is not as attractive as it is for the M16 series (not a decisive factor, but it does impact upon the equation). Ammunition basic load will be lower (but if the guy is supposed to be delivering one-shot/one-kill results, no biggie). Of course they are apparently still available in the thousands, stored over the past decades for God knows what reason... Brooks Brooks snip |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
In article , "Kevin Brooks"
wrote: Of course they are apparently still available in the thousands, stored over the past decades for God knows what reason... I noticed in the news the other night quite a lot of the Haitian rebels armed with M-14s. Or maybe they were militia, whatever, but they were carrying the M-14. How many have been given away? -- Harry Andreas Engineering raconteur |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
"Harry Andreas" wrote in message ... In article , "Kevin Brooks" wrote: Of course they are apparently still available in the thousands, stored over the past decades for God knows what reason... I noticed in the news the other night quite a lot of the Haitian rebels armed with M-14s. Or maybe they were militia, whatever, but they were carrying the M-14. How many have been given away? I am sure oodles of them were provided under the aegis of MAP. Just like we did with the earlier M-1 (a couple of years back it was very easy to find former ROK M-1's for sale here in the states). Brooks -- Harry Andreas Engineering raconteur |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 02:12:08 GMT, "David E. Powell"
wrote: It is called the USMC Designated Rifleman or Designated Marksman program, IIRC. It issues M-14s (scoped I think) to some volunteers/highly skilled shooters. To take on targets needing precision during small engagements to compliment unit fire and designated scout/sniper teams. There was news about it a while back. IT's not being issued to infantry units per se, and last I heard the DMR wasn't being issued to the sniper scout pairs eitehr (thought this may still be on the cards). The only deployments I've heard of have been to EOD teams spending their days plinking all the submunitions scattered by 30 years of war around Afghanistan (and presumably Iraq too though I've not heard confirmation). It's supposed to be good out to about 700m. Peter Kemp |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Kemp" wrote in message ... On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 02:12:08 GMT, "David E. Powell" wrote: It is called the USMC Designated Rifleman or Designated Marksman program, IIRC. It issues M-14s (scoped I think) to some volunteers/highly skilled shooters. To take on targets needing precision during small engagements to compliment unit fire and designated scout/sniper teams. There was news about it a while back. IT's not being issued to infantry units per se, and last I heard the DMR wasn't being issued to the sniper scout pairs eitehr (thought this may still be on the cards). The only deployments I've heard of have been to EOD teams spending their days plinking all the submunitions scattered by 30 years of war around Afghanistan (and presumably Iraq too though I've not heard confirmation). It's supposed to be good out to about 700m. One has to wonder what the advantage of the M14/M21 in such a role over the M16A2 would be. If the target is an itty-bitty DPICM bomblet, that 700 meter range is worthless--think more in terms of 100 meters, which means that the M16A2 is plenty accurate and has more than enough ebergy to do the job. Brooks Peter Kemp |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
50% of NAZI oil was supplied from US | Grantland | Military Aviation | 106 | January 18th 14 07:58 PM |
What if the germans... | Charles Gray | Military Aviation | 119 | January 26th 04 11:20 PM |
China in space. | Harley W. Daugherty | Military Aviation | 74 | November 1st 03 06:26 PM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |
German historian provokes row over war photos | BackToNormal | Military Aviation | 21 | October 24th 03 11:32 PM |