If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
52/1 Performance in a 15M ship at half the weight.
On Feb 27, 6:00*pm, Frank wrote:
Soaring magazine should be leading the charge here, with photos of the factory floor and interviews with the builder, but instead it seems to be ignoring the whole thing. My own high-performance carbon fiber sailplane project got coverage in the national soaring press last year. In Canada: http://www.sac.ca/index.php?option=c... 398&Itemid=88 Thanks, Bob K. www.hpaircraft.com |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
52/1 Performance in a 15M ship at half the weight.
wrote:
It would seem that the Duckhawk would have more international appeal as a Standard class (15m no flaps) ship - wonder how it would perform without flaps? It sure wouldn't need that 200 knot Vne, would it? Flaps are essential to get the wide speed range that makes the the 200 knot Vne useful. My understanding is the airfoil is optimized for climbing and very high speed flight. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
52/1 Performance in a 15M ship at half the weight.
On Feb 27, 8:55*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote:
My understanding is the airfoil is optimized for climbing and very high speed flight. Eric, that kinda stretches the meaning of the word "optimize" a bit. Thanks, Bob K. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
52/1 Performance in a 15M ship at half the weight.
Bob Kuykendall wrote:
On Feb 27, 8:55 pm, Eric Greenwell wrote: My understanding is the airfoil is optimized for climbing and very high speed flight. Eric, that kinda stretches the meaning of the word "optimize" a bit. Thanks, Bob K. It is an optimized compromise. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
52/1 Performance in a 15M ship at half the weight.
If you design for high Clmax and stall at high alpha (to give good climb
performance) and very low drag at the high speed end, without worrying about L/D ratio in the middle, then that fills Eric's statement definition. Doing it is another matter........ At 06:54 28 February 2009, Greg Arnold wrote: Bob Kuykendall wrote: On Feb 27, 8:55 pm, Eric Greenwell wrote: My understanding is the airfoil is optimized for climbing and very high speed flight. Eric, that kinda stretches the meaning of the word "optimize" a bit. Thanks, Bob K. It is an optimized compromise. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
52/1 Performance in a 15M ship at half the weight.
The DuckHawk wing IS optimised for high speed and low speed flight. A
tremendous amount of effort went into creating a wing that would work well at slow speeds with the flaps down, and also work very well at high speeds with flaps up. Additionally, Greg did a lot of analysis of how to maximize the cross country speed. To simplify greatly, the result was to climb really fast and run really fast. That actually simplified things a little with the flaps. Basically, one would fly with flaps down while climbing and then transition directly to flaps up and run fast to find the next thermal. Intermediate speeds and flap positions were not that necessary. So, the flaps up/high speed case and the flaps down/ low speed point were optimized. Of course, in the real world, there might be times when you don't want to do exactly what the theory says, so last I heard, the flaps will just have 3 positions: up, zero, and down (a landing position was discussed, but I don't know if it is incorporated). Quite a lot of effort was also made to give a fairly wide performance range to each position. So, while it is optimized for run and climb, there won't be a big hole in the middle of the polar. Doug T. On Feb 28, 6:46*am, Bob Kuykendall wrote: On Feb 27, 8:55*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote: My understanding is the airfoil is optimized for climbing and very high speed flight. Eric, that kinda stretches the meaning of the word "optimize" a bit. Thanks, Bob K. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
52/1 Performance in a 15M ship at half the weight.
I just checked last months issue of SOARING. There was an article on the
ARCUS - a sailplane that has yet to fly. I've also recently been reading back thru old issue of SOARING from our club library. In the late '70s and early '80s it appears every issue has an article on the latest homebuilt news. Nearly all of this is about sailplanes that had yet to be built or fly. I think the article should have been published by SOARING. John |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
52/1 Performance in a 15M ship at half the weight.
On Feb 28, 6:54*am, wrote:
The DuckHawk wing IS optimised for high speed and low speed flight. *A tremendous amount of effort went into creating a wing that would work well at slow speeds with the flaps down, and also work very well at high speeds with flaps up. Additionally, Greg did a lot of analysis of how to maximize the cross country speed. *To simplify greatly, the result was to climb really fast and run really fast. *That actually simplified things a little with the flaps. *Basically, one would fly with flaps down while climbing and then transition directly to flaps up and run fast to find the next thermal. *Intermediate speeds and flap positions were not that necessary. * So, the flaps up/high speed case and the flaps down/ low speed point were optimized. *Of course, in the real world, there might be times when you don't want to do exactly what the theory says, so last I heard, the flaps will just have 3 positions: up, zero, and down (a landing position was discussed, but I don't know if it is incorporated). *Quite a lot of effort was also made to give a fairly wide performance range to each position. *So, while it is optimized for run and climb, there won't be a big hole in the middle of the polar. It seem they are simply taking the historical trend to the next logical step. For 20 years or more now designers have be trying to optimize around a design point that represents typical cruise speed, rather than trying to increase best L/D, for instance. With advances in materials you can make a lighter, smaller wetted area glider that has less form drag and therefore pushes the "knee" in the polar to a higher speed. If you can find some magic in the airfoil/flap design then maybe you can push the overall design even further along these same lines, but that is harder to do I think. For a current generation 15M gilders the knee is around 90kts. Keep in mind that the polar of any glider is a continuous curve and the designer will still optimize flap settings, etc. to match a specific climb rate (and McCready setting) that will get you to a specific cruise speed that is optimal to maximize cross-country speed. If you pick a planform/airfoil/flap arrangement to suit a particularly high cruise speed you are implicitly designing the glider around stronger soaring conditions. Dick Schreder tried this in 1969 with the HP-15, (although without benefit of materials/construction innovations at play with the Duckhawk). When people say that the Duckhawk is "optimized" for very high speed cruise I immediately wonder how high? I can see somewhat higher speeds (maybe 100-110kts) driven by the construction innovations. I can maybe see going a little higher to optimize around stronger conditions - but you need to be careful about going too far and having a glider that does poorly in weak weather, a la HP-15. I don't see the point in setting things up for ultra-high cruise speeds unless you want a glider that is optimized around wave record flying - but that was another thread... I am intrigued - can't wait to see it fly. 9B |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
52/1 Performance in a 15M ship at half the weight.
For those of you who haven't been around forever, only two HP-15s were
built. The original design called for a 15 meter wing with an extreme aspect ratio of 33 to 1. As a result of Dick Schreder placing 65th in the US Nationals both '15s have been re-winged. The prototype now has a HP-16 wing and the other one sports a HP-18 wing. The HP-15 fuselage is very similar to the HP-14 except that the 1-inch square-steel-tubing cockpit framing has been replaced by aluminum tubing. The cockpit is large enough to provide adequate room for a 6' 4" pilot. Wayne HP-14 "6F" http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder wrote in message ... On Feb 28, 6:54 am, wrote: .... Snip... When people say that the Duckhawk is "optimized" for very high speed cruise I immediately wonder how high? I can see somewhat higher speeds (maybe 100-110kts) driven by the construction innovations. I can maybe see going a little higher to optimize around stronger conditions - but you need to be careful about going too far and having a glider that does poorly in weak weather, a la HP-15. I don't see the point in setting things up for ultra-high cruise speeds unless you want a glider that is optimized around wave record flying - but that was another thread... I am intrigued - can't wait to see it fly. 9B |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
52/1 Performance in a 15M ship at half the weight.
On Feb 25, 5:11*pm, SF wrote:
I wrote the following article and submitted it to Soaring for publication because it was something I was interested in and I thought others would be too. *It was rejected because the subject matter wasn't suitable for soaring. *Greg Cole is doing something extraordinary at Windward Performance and I feel that Soaring is doing all of us a disservice by not putting content like this in the magazine. ****************** My Trip To Windward Performance At the 2008 SSA convention in Albuquerque, NM I attended Greg Cole’s presentation on the new 15M sailplane he’s building called the DuckHawk. * The presentation piqued my interest and I managed to retain the knowledge that the DuckHawk is an American name for Peregrine Falcon, the fastest moving creature on earth, and that Greg Cole’s Sailplane factory is in Bend Oregon. * * * * Other details stuck with me too, like an L/D of 52/1. *Minimum Sink is 111 fpm; empty weight is 300 Lbs, and this Hawk has an aspect ratio of 30.0:1. *The 200 Kt. VNE would make for one hot smoking final glide. When business took me to Portland, Oregon last Fall, I realized I’d be fairly close to Bend. A few phone calls got me an appointment with Greg Cole, president and creative force behind Windward Performance Ltd, DuckHawk’s creator as well as builders of 11M span SparrowHawk. Greg Cole has been building and flying his designs since he was a kid. *He has a BSME from the University of North Dakota, and a MSAE from Notre Dame. *He holds a US patent on propeller design. *His work experience includes the McCauley Propeller Company, Columbia Aircraft Company (chief Engineer), Cirrus Design, Lancair, and Adam Aircraft. He has made significant Design contributions to several different aircraft including: the Lancair Legacy, the Lancair Evolution, The Columbia 300, The Chanute, The A500, and of course the SparrowHawk which is the only U.S. designed sailplane to hold a world record in 30 years. *The Columbia 300 bears mentioning again as it was the first new design certified by the FAA in 17 years, and it was a full composite airframe from a new company. For those of us that live in America’s South, the drive from Portland to Bend is simply amazing. * In South Carolina we drive in one green tunnel of pine trees after another, and while we have mountains, they don’t have snow on them in early September like Mount Hood. *The drive down through the high desert is truly beautiful - just don’t try to pump your own gas. Oregon gas stations are required by state law to be full service. The modern sailplane is one truly amazing piece of machinery. *They may look simple but they’re among the most sophisticated aircraft flying. *I learned to fly in a Grob 103. *My first single-place glider was a 1968 Open Cirrus with massive fiberglass spars, fat wings, and heavy enough to send everyone on the field running the other direction any time you pull your trailer into the assembly area. I moved up to a mid-80’s LS6-a, and began teaching students in a 2-33. *The historical progression from the 2-33 and its flying barn door performance, to a first generation glass ship like the Cirrus, a second generation glass ship like the LS6-a, and a modern glider using knife like laminar-flow wings is exciting to experience firsthand. One of my friends sums it up saying “these new planes just do what you want them to do so much easier, and they do it so much better”. Improvements in modern sailplane performance have been driven by advances in materials, a better understanding of how to design aerodynamic structures with these materials, computer modeling, and leaps in understanding aerodynamic principles. Most modern sailplanes, with the exception of Windward Performance’s aircraft, are built with a wet, room temperature cured, epoxy resin lay up using glass, carbon, or Kevlar fiber reinforcement. *The reinforcing cloth is laid into the mold by hand and the epoxy squeegeed, or painted on. *This type of construction process was quite an advance over previous wood and metal construction and quite a bit better than “fiberglass” or polyester resins or even the vinyl ester resins but still imposes several limitations on how strong aircraft parts may be made. * When the resins cure at room temperature there is fairly short amount of “out-time” – the number of minutes workers have to craft the part before the resin’s curing process begins. *Complicated multi- layer layups have to be done quickly. *Yet fiber orientation and wetout are important in critical aircraft applications. As a result room-temperature resin application often means a heavier composite structure to maintain structural safety. *The room temperature curing of resins, causes the finished part to lose structural integrity rapidly at temperatures over 140 F, which is why modern composite sailplanes are painted white. *If they were painted black or even red they would heat up under sunlight and loose structural integrity. Thus Cole’s Windward Performance is the only sailplane manufacturer I’m aware of to use sophisticated prepreg oven-cured carbon fiber construction. *Prepreg carbon fiber is produced in a factory by sandwiching a carbon fiber cloth between two epoxy resin sheets, the sandwich is then run this between high-pressure rollers. *The high pressure insures an even and complete epoxy coating of the fabric with the ability to very precisely control the ratio of resin to fabric. This allows the composite’s weight to remain low but optimized for strength with very tight tolerances. *Once the fabric is epoxy coated it is refrigerated for storage and transport, greatly retarding the start of the curing process. Since the resin does not cure at room temperatures there is much more out-time in which to lay up the prepreg material in, say, a wing-mold while avoiding mistakes from rushing. There’ more time for forming complicated multi-layer configurations. In Windward’s aircraft, the prepreg layup is vacuum-bagged to ensure all air is squeezed out of the layup and the entire assembly goes into an oven to cure at high temperatures. The benefits of all this are lighter, far stronger and stiffer composites with a much larger temperature operating range than conventional wet layup composites afford. Given these advantages, and given Greg Cole’s expertise and obviously high standards of craftsmanship, it became clear why Windward Performance uses prepregs, and why they result in the Duck Hawk’s performance advantages. A winning 15M racing sailplane moves around the course in the least amount of time with the highest average cross country speed. *The key to obtaining that is, naturally, minimizing the time you go slow. Climbing well and going fast between thermals sounds easy, but mastering this simple concept is far from easy. *Most of us with modest skills in this area could use all the help we can get from the aircraft. The modeling of average cross country speeds with different atmospheric conditions allowed performance simulations of different design iterations to be run and small improvements or losses to be determined. *The accuracy of modeling new designs was, for Cole, validated by modeling current designs with known performance characteristics. Designs that can be made light with small wing areas offer improved performance over conventional designs especially in tough conditions. Tough conditions – small thermals, weak lift, headwinds, etc. - seem to have a far greater negative impact on my contest results than do the positives of favorable conditions. Cole’s calculations show soaring with the ability to fly well with low lift coefficients can also give the ability to go fast at relatively low wing loadings, meaning faster average cross country speeds. *The results of the modeling process indicated an optimum with a wing area of 80 SQFT, and a wing loading of 8.75 LBS/SQFT. Determining the optimum airfoil also benefits from Cole’s computer modeling process. *Structural constraints start as the wing area drops below 90 square feet, and wing volume available for ballast drops rapidly as well. *As wing area decreases, the Reynolds number goes down and achieving low drag at high and low lift coefficients becomes more and more difficult. Good stalling behavior is another factor Cole considered. *Amongst all of the airfoils designed the final airfoil selected for the DuckHawk is the CS33-18; it allows the aircraft to fly at low lift coefficients at high speeds as well as at high lift coefficients at low speeds. Winglets were considered but an evaluation of their negatives and benefits indicated the DuckHawk would fly better without them when real world soaring techniques were considered. State of the art performance is what Cole is after here, plus safety and relative affordability. *The 30:1 aspect ratio and its razor thin wings are an obvious clue this is not your generic modern glider. Eighty-pound wings will be appreciated by everyone during assembly. Eighteen-meter L/D performance with a 15-meter wing span will result in lower drag while circling and this plane should climb like a bandit. The ship’s lower mass will give it an induced drag advantage of 29% compared to today’s 15m sailplanes at equivalent wing loadings. That means better climbing. *Lower wetted area means lower parasitic drag and improved high speed running. A wing loading range between 6.25 and 10.0 lbs./sq. Ft. will give it ability to adapt to a wide variety of soaring conditions - a plane that will get you quickly around the course on the tough days and fly faster than anything else out there now on really good days. Before my trip to Windward Performance I was unaware of the complexity of the sailplane manufacturing process. *The plugs and molds required to produce a sailplane, fill a good sized warehouse even without working room around them. *The design and production capabilities of this small sailplane operation ... read more » SF, Exactly who at the SSA Soaring Magazine said the subject matter wasn't suitable for soaring. Richard www.craggyareo.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fiberglass cloth weight vs 'finished' weight | Fred the Red Shirt | Home Built | 12 | April 5th 08 04:24 PM |
Glider Weight/Wing Loading and determing speed for best L/D for a given weight | 65E | Soaring | 3 | January 26th 06 09:26 PM |
Flight Level and a half | Scott Draper | Instrument Flight Rules | 56 | October 5th 05 02:40 AM |
Complex / High Performance / Low Performance | R.T. | Owning | 22 | July 6th 04 08:04 AM |
Empty/Gross weight Vs. Max. Pilot weight | Flyhighdave | Soaring | 13 | January 14th 04 04:20 AM |