If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Narrowing it down... Comanche?
Hello, Folks:
You may remember my posting of 3 Jan, titled "Resource for choosing a plane?" ]. I got quite a bit of help & pointers from this group (along with a few requisite wise-ass remarks!), for which I'm very grateful. Since then, I've done a bit of homework. I've bought & read Clarke's _The Illustrated Buyer's Guide to Used Airplanes_, 6th ed.; Ellis' _Buying and Owning Your Own Airplane_, 3rd ed.; and Wanttaja's _Airplane Ownership_. I've also been reading every GA magazine I can find, as well as print & online versions of "Trade-A-Plane," "Aero Trader," etc. Oh, yeah--been keeping up on this board, too. My conclusion? Well, still written in Jell-O--but, the best bang/$ model meeting my requirements appears to be...: Piper Comanche (PA-24-xxx) [deliberately holding off on engine for the moment]. So, once again, I'd like to solicit some thoughts from the group. Following are some of my thoughts--I'd love to have any opinions (especially difference-of-opinion), corrections, or additions you may have. - I ended up eliminating all fixed gear/fixed prop models I saw because few could meet my speed & useful load requirements, especially at my high altitude (Colorado Springs). The hardest one for me to get away from was the Grumman-American Tiger (AA-5B) [has the speed & load, but marginal climb and a narrow cabin discouraged me; I got my PP ticket in these and have a soft spot for 'em], followed closely by the Piper Cherokee 180 (PA-28-180/181) line [marginal speed, marginal climb--but certainly appears to be the "sweet spot" on the used market, and I have several hours in these, too]. Can anyone prove me wrong on these, especially on my climb-at-altitude concern? - Several fixed gear/cs prop models fit the bill. I like the numbers of the Piper Cherokee 235 (PA-28-235/236) line and the Piper Cherokee Six (PA-32-260/300/301) line. Ultimately, the bang/buck thing has me leaning to the Comanche. Comments on that position? - Other retracts caught my eye, besides the Comanche. I like the PA-28R "Arrow" line as much as the fixed-gear Cherokees, and the same goes for the PA-32R versions of the "Six" line. Bang/buck again. One extremely sexy (albeit somewhat pricier) retract alternative is the EADS/Socata Trinidad (TB-20)--if I can't find a Comanche (assuming that's my final target) for the right price, I may set my sights on a Trinidad. -- Many of the planes I eliminated in this category were due to cost, either acquisition or operating (typically both). I like the numbers of the Beech 33, 35, and 36 series, but serious bucks to buy and own (and, in my book, that throw-over control and backward configuration fall into the "weird" category I'm trying to avoid). What about the Beech 24 series? Couldn't find much on them.... -- Money also an issue on the Rockwell/Commanders and the Diamonds. -- One obvious contender I bypassed here is the Mooneys. I'm ready for contrary opinions here, but my reading seems to indicate that early models will be claustrophobic, at best; the "middle" models (the M20J) start getting better but have marginal useful loads; and the "later" models have all you could want but are big bucks.... -- Two other marques that have intrigued me are Meyers and Navion--but, I can't find any significant info on either one. Is that a sign that they're too rare for serious consideration (since I deliberately want to stay "mainstream" my first time out)? Opinions on these? So, Comanche is leading the pack. Reading my list above, I seem to be prejudiced in favor of Pipers--I don't know if that's a reflection of me or of how well those models seem to fit my needs & preferences. Do I have blinders on? Among the Comanches: after toying with the idea of the 400, I calmed down. The 180s seem like a steal, but the useful load is marginal and I worry about the climb-at-altitude. So, I'm down to the 250/260/260B/260C decision--but I'm holding off on that for the moment. Before I burn too many brain bytes or go too far down the rabbit hole, I'm hoping for either confirmation or contradiction of my thought processes here. If you've read this far, you must have at least SOME opinions to share...! Thanks for any help or advice you have to give. -- Doug "Where am I to go/Now that I've gone too far?" -- Golden Earring, "Twilight Zone" (my email is spam-proofed; read the address and make the appropriate change to contact me) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Comanche accident averted last evening | [email protected] | Piloting | 23 | April 13th 05 10:02 AM |
Future Home of Comanche prototype #1 | Dan & Jan Hollenbaugh | Military Aviation | 1 | August 13th 04 05:37 AM |
Comanche Aircraft headed to museums | Dan & Jan Hollenbaugh | Military Aviation | 0 | June 11th 04 01:32 PM |
Comanche 260 - 1965 | Sami Saydjari | Owning | 5 | December 8th 03 12:24 AM |
RAH-66 Comanche helicopter could face budget cuts in 2005 | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 0 | November 19th 03 02:18 PM |