If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
2011 USA Proposed Competition Rules Changes Posted.
On Dec 28, 1:53*pm, Andy wrote:
On Dec 28, 6:59*am, wrote: On Dec 27, 9:43*pm, Andy wrote: On Dec 27, 6:18*pm, wrote: On Dec 27, 8:00*pm, Andy wrote: On Dec 27, 4:54*pm, "Wayne Paul" wrote: "John Godfrey (QT)" wrote in ... Discussion invited. http://www.ssa.org/files/member/2011...20Summary%2010... John Godfrey (QT) SSA Competition Rules Committee After reading through the rules it is my assumption that both SPOT and APRS systems are allowed. Wayne HP-14 "6F" I wondered about that. *What commercially available device performs the complete APRS function? If the intent of the rule is to deny use of prohibited functionality why does it matter if a device or system that provides permitted functionality is commercially available? Andy Wording is specifying commercially produced devices ie. Flarm and not some homebuilt device that someone my claim is equivalent. Limit of functionality can be used to ensure , if this path is chosen, that outside information is limited to that which satisfies the anti collision objective, without providing additional information that is useful tactically, such as gaggles, climb rates, possibly energy paths that are not permitted under the current rules philosophy. What and how all this nay be done will be a long topic with many opinions. UH Ok, let's get specific. *I have ordered PowerFLARM. *I am also an alpha and beta tester for, and user of, LK80000 tactical flight computer software. *Do the proposed 2011 rules allow me to interface PowerFLARM with LK8000 and to use any FLARM information presented by LK8000 during SSA sanctioned contests? Andy- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I don't know a lot of detail about the LK8000, but what I understand is that it may embody the kind of processing and display of information that is not addressed in the text of the rules but is outside the scope of what has been the philosophy of the rules intent. One of the reasons we are not black and white is it has not been clear how quickly useful tactical devices will appear. It is quite possible that we will end with rules that do not permit the exporting of tactically useful information such as climb rate from PowerFlarm. In fairness to those who may be contemplating buying new devices to get an advantage over the other guy, they should know that they may well not be permitted. As to exactly what will be available for 2010, that is one element of the debate. UH I understand the problem you are facing with PowerFLARM data usage, but please be careful that any *constraints that may be imposed on PowerFLARM transmitted data, or on the usage of the data, are not incompatible with the apparent move towards allowing team flying in SSA sanctioned contests. One could perhaps implement a contest mode in which climb rate data is suppressed except between pilots that have each entered a prearranged team code. *That would presumably require PowerFLARM to transmit the team code and the receiving unit would only display climb rate (or other restricted use data) if its team code was the same. *A public team code would allow all users to see everyone's data when not flying in a contest. Andy- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - RC has agreed to permit radio usage in Regionals, by waiver, as one thing that could be used to allow punditing to help bring beginners along. To make the assumption that we are moving toward allowing team flying would be a pretty big stretch from the action we are taking. UH |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
2011 USA Proposed Competition Rules Changes Posted.
On Dec 27, 2:21*pm, "John Godfrey (QT)"
wrote: Discussion invited. http://www.ssa.org/files/member/2011...20Summary%2010... John Godfrey (QT) SSA Competition Rules Committee Hmm, Item #11 - Landing at an airport - coordinates are no longer assumed: Doug Jacobs/2010 Mifflin Regional Day 1 rule? ;-) TA |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
2011 USA Proposed Competition Rules Changes Posted.
On Dec 30, 11:09*pm, Frank wrote:
On Dec 27, 2:21*pm, "John Godfrey (QT)" wrote: Discussion invited. http://www.ssa.org/files/member/2011...20Summary%2010... John Godfrey (QT) SSA Competition Rules Committee Hmm, Item #11 - Landing at an airport - coordinates are no longer assumed: *Doug Jacobs/2010 Mifflin Regional Day 1 rule? ;-) TA That occurrance did raise the issue. In Doug's case the correct result was accomplished by measuring to his point of furthest progress which was on downwind beyond the end of the airport. It did lead to a review of the associated rules with an eye toward avoiding possible conflicting choices by the scorer. HNY UH UH |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
USA 2010 Competition Rules Committee Minutes Posted | John Godfrey (QT)[_2_] | Soaring | 43 | December 23rd 10 02:33 AM |
2011 USA competition schedule ? | Dave Nadler | Soaring | 22 | October 19th 10 08:07 PM |
Proposed US Competition Rules Changes for 2010 | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | December 17th 09 05:20 PM |
2008 Proposed US Competition Rules Changes | [email protected] | Soaring | 18 | December 31st 07 07:21 PM |
Proposed 2005 Rules On SRA Site | Ken Kochanski (KK) | Soaring | 79 | January 27th 05 06:51 PM |