If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Preparing the Battlefied: Bush Adminstration steps up its secretmoves against Iran
Forwarded:
Preparing the Battlefield The Bush Administration steps up its secret moves against Iran. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2...7fa_fact_hersh Did you see the recent Reuters piece about the covert operations that the US has been involved with in Iraq according to Seymour Hersh as he has an article about such in latest issue of the New Yorker (see the link above). I had tried to get Lara Logan (chief foreign correspondent for the CBS Evening News) to do a segment about the US sponsorship of such and was also in touch with Michael Ware of CNN trying to get him to cover such as well (to no avail with him either). Based on the following Huffingtonpost.com URL I can assume that both Lara and Michael had other matters on their minds: Lara Logan, Michael Ware Involved In Steamy Baghdad Love Triangle: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/0..._n_109331.html Friend General Janis Karpinski of Abu Ghraib had told me that she was in charge of guarding the MEK in Iraq and that Condi Rice was in the loop with such as well.. The following article is most interesting as well (note the Israeli mention): Subverting Iran: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...ticl eId=5165 Here is a tiny URL of the above one: http://tinyurl.com/yop927 Richard Perle of the 'JINSA crowd' has supported the MEK as well: http://gorillaintheroom.blogspot.com...ention-in.html Here is a tiny URL of the above the one: http://tinyurl.com/5rfz5m Here is the Reuters article (couldn't locate a URL yet though but will post one if I can find one!): U.S. escalating covert operations against Iran - report (Reuters) 2 hours, 40 minutes ago U.S. congressional leaders agreed late last year to President George W. Bush's funding request for a major escalation of covert operations against Iran aimed at destabilizing its leadership, according to a report in The New Yorker magazine published online on Sunday. The article by reporter Seymour Hersh, from the magazine's July 7 and 14 issue, centers around a highly classified Presidential Finding signed by Bush which by U.S. law must be made known to Democratic and Republican House and Senate leaders and ranking members of the intelligence committees. "The Finding was focused on undermining Iran's nuclear ambitions and trying to undermine the government through regime change," the article cited a person familiar with its contents as saying, and involved "working with opposition groups and passing money." Hersh has written previously about possible administration plans to go to war to stop Tehran from obtaining nuclear weapons, including an April 2006 article in the New Yorker that suggested regime change in Iran, whether by diplomatic or military means, was Bush's ultimate goal. Funding for the covert escalation, for which Bush requested up to $400 million, was approved by congressional leaders, according to the article, citing current and former military, intelligence and congressional sources. Clandestine operations against Iran are not new. U.S. Special Operations Forces have been conducting crossborder operations from southern Iraq since last year, the article said. These have included seizing members of Al Quds, the commando arm of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, and taking them to Iraq for interrogation, and the pursuit of "high-value targets" in Bush's war on terrorism, who may be captured or killed, according to the article. But the scale and the scope of the operations in Iran, which include the Central Intelligence Agency, have now been significantly expanded, the article said, citing current and former officials. Many of these activities are not specified in the new finding, and some congressional leaders have had serious questions about their nature, it said. Among groups inside Iran benefiting from U.S. support is the Jundallah, also known as the Iranian People's Resistance Movement, according to former CIA officer Robert Baer. Council on Foreign Relations analyst Vali Nasr described it to Hersh as a vicious organization suspected of links to al Qaeda. The article said U.S. support for the dissident groups could prompt a violent crackdown by Iran, which could give the Bush administration a reason to intervene. None of the Democratic leaders in Congress would comment on the finding, the article said. The White House, which has repeatedly denied preparing for military action against Iran, and the CIA also declined comment. The United States is leading international efforts to rein in Iran's suspected effort to develop nuclear weapons, although Washington concedes Iran has the right to develop nuclear power for civilian uses. '----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://NEOCONZIONISTTHREAT.BLOGSPOT.COM http://NOMOREWARFORISRAEL.BLOGSPOT.COM -------------------------------------------------------- June 28, 2008 America Is the Rogue Nation by Charley Reese One gets the impression that there are some people in Washington who believe that Israel or the U.S. can bomb Iran's nuclear reactors, fly home, and it will be mission complete. It makes you wonder if perhaps there is a virus going around that is gradually making people stupid. If we or Israel attack Iran, we will have a new war on our hands. The Iranians are not going to shrug off an attack and say, "You naughty boys, you." Consider how much trouble Iraq has given us. Some 4,000 dead and 29,000 wounded, a half a trillion dollars in cost and still climbing, and five years later, we cannot say that the country is pacified. Iraq is a small country compared with Iran. Iran has about 70 million people. Its western mountains border the Persian Gulf. In other words, its missiles and guns look down on the U.S. ships below it. And it has lots of missiles, from short-range to intermediate-range (around 2,200 kilometers). More to the point, it has been equipped by Russia with the fastest anti-ship missile on the planet. The SS-N-22 Sunburn can travel at Mach 3 at high altitude and at Mach 2.2 at low altitude. That is faster than anything in our arsenal. Iran's conventional forces include an army of 540,000 men and 300,000 reserves, including 120,000 Iranian Guards especially trained in unconventional warfare. It has more than 1,600 main battle tanks and 21,000 other armored combat vehicles. It has 3,200 artillery pieces, three submarines, 59 surface warships and 10 amphibious ships. It's been receiving help in arming itself from China, North Korea and Russia. Unlike Iraq, Iran's forces have not been worn down with bombing, wars and sanctions. It also has a new anti-aircraft defense system from Russia that I've heard is pretty snazzy. So, if you think we or Israel can attack Iran and not expect retaliation, I'd have to say with regret that you are a moron. If you think we could easily handle Iran in an all-out war, I'd have to promote you to idiot. Attacking Iran would be folly, but we seem to be living in the Age of Folly. Morons and idiots took us into an unjustified war against Iraq before we had finished the job in Afghanistan. Now we have troops tied down in both countries. For some years now, I've worried that we seem to be more and more like Colonial England – arrogant, racist, overestimating our own capacity and underestimating that of our enemies. As the fate of the British Empire demonstrates, that is a fatal flaw. The British never dreamed that the "little yellow people" could come ashore by land and take Singapore from the rear or that they would sink the pride of the British fleet, but they did both. I suppose no one in Washington can imagine the Iranians sinking one of our carriers in the Persian Gulf. How'd you like to be the president who has to tell the American people that we've lost a carrier for the first time since World War II? Exactly how the Iranians will respond to an attack, I don't know, but they will respond. In keeping with our present policy, our attack on Iran would be illegal, since under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Iran has the right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes. Who would have thought that we would become the rogue nation committing acts of aggression around the globe? Find this article at: http://www.antiwar.com/reese/?articleid=13061 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Preparing the Battlefied: Bush Adminstration steps up its secret moves against Iran
NOMOREWARFORISRAEL wrote in
: [snip] Preparing the Battlefield The Bush Administration steps up its secret moves against Iran. How secret can they be if Fugginazi idjits like yerself`are blattin' them about? Besides which howja know this isn't just what the Pentagon wants ya ta think is gonna happen? Muwahahahahahaaaaaaaaaa! IBM |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Preparing the Battlefied: Bush Adminstration steps up its secretmoves against Iran
Hersh: Congress Agreed to Bush Request to Fund Major Escalation in
Secret Operations Against Iran: http://www.democracynow.org/2008/6/3...o_bush_request AIPAC pushing US to war with Iran for Israel: http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot....with-iran.html Stop the AIPAC sponsored 'Iran war' legislation calling for a blockade of Iran (to get the war with Iran going for Israel): http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0...ic.php?t=91563 Chris Hedges: Insane to attack Iran: http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot....tack-iran.html Bob Barr: Attacking Iran Highly Irresponsible & Detrimental http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot....an-highly.html A Clean Break/war for Israel agenda: http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot....ean-break.html Check out the question for Scott McClellan about how the JINSA (Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs) crowd pushed US to attack Iraq for Israel and are now doing similar to get US to attack Iran (how many more Americans have to die/get horribly maimed for this perpetual war for Israel agenda?): http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot....ut-neocon.html McCain is a serving Israel first traitor to America: http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot....subscribe.html Israeli threat spikes our oil prices and crashes our stock market: http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot....prices-we.html Would it be possible (if it isn't too late to already) to conduct a House hearing with Flynt Leverett after what he mentioned at New America about the Bush regime perpetuating fraud over Iran (a youtube of Flynt conveying such is daisy-chained after the initial youtube about the disgraceful interview that '60 Minutes' did with Ahmadinejad via the following link)?: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onNzr...x=0&playnext=1 The following article appeared in the 'Daily Star' in Lebanon: Bush could do himself a favor by heeding Iran's warnings: http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article....&categ_id =17 Here is the URL for the Bromwich piece: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-..._b_109868.html On Jun 29, 4:06*pm, NOMOREWARFORISRAEL wrote: Forwarded: Preparing the Battlefield The Bush Administration steps up its secret moves against Iran. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2...7fa_fact_hersh Did you see the recent Reuters piece about the covert operations that the US has been involved with in Iraq according to Seymour Hersh as he has an article about such in latest issue of the New Yorker (see the link above). I had tried to get Lara Logan (chief foreign correspondent for the CBS Evening News) to do a segment about the US sponsorship of such and was also in touch with Michael Ware of CNN trying to get him to cover such as well (to no avail with him either). Based on the following Huffingtonpost.com URL I can assume that both Lara and Michael had other matters on their minds: Lara Logan, Michael Ware Involved In Steamy Baghdad Love Triangle: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/0...hael-ware-i_n_... Friend General Janis Karpinski of Abu Ghraib had told me that she was in charge of guarding the MEK in Iraq and that Condi Rice was in the loop with such as well.. The following article is most interesting as well (note the Israeli mention): Subverting Iran: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...cle&code=20070.... Here is a tiny URL of the above one: http://tinyurl.com/yop927 Richard Perle of the 'JINSA crowd' has supported the MEK as well: http://gorillaintheroom.blogspot.com...group-to-hold-... Here is a tiny URL of the above the one: http://tinyurl.com/5rfz5m Here is the Reuters article (couldn't locate a URL yet though but will post one if I can find one!): U.S. escalating covert operations against Iran - report (Reuters) 2 hours, 40 minutes ago U.S. congressional leaders agreed late last year to President George W. Bush's funding request for a major escalation of covert operations against Iran aimed at destabilizing its leadership, according to a report in The New Yorker magazine published online on Sunday. The article by reporter Seymour Hersh, from the magazine's July 7 and 14 issue, centers around a highly classified Presidential Finding signed by Bush which by U.S. law must be made known to Democratic and Republican House and Senate leaders and ranking members of the intelligence committees. "The Finding was focused on undermining Iran's nuclear ambitions and trying to undermine the government through regime change," the article cited a person familiar with its contents as saying, and involved "working with opposition groups and passing money." Hersh has written previously about possible administration plans to go to war to stop Tehran from obtaining nuclear weapons, including an April 2006 article in the New Yorker that suggested regime change in Iran, whether by diplomatic or military means, was Bush's ultimate goal. Funding for the covert escalation, for which Bush requested up to $400 million, was approved by congressional leaders, according to the article, citing current and former military, intelligence and congressional sources. Clandestine operations against Iran are not new. U.S. Special Operations Forces have been conducting crossborder operations from southern Iraq since last year, the article said. These have included seizing members of Al Quds, the commando arm of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, and taking them to Iraq for interrogation, and the pursuit of "high-value targets" in Bush's war on terrorism, who may be captured or killed, according to the article. But the scale and the scope of the operations in Iran, which include the Central Intelligence Agency, have now been significantly expanded, the article said, citing current and former officials. Many of these activities are not specified in the new finding, and some congressional leaders have had serious questions about their nature, it said. Among groups inside Iran benefiting from U.S. support is the Jundallah, also known as the Iranian People's Resistance Movement, according to former CIA officer Robert Baer. Council on Foreign Relations analyst Vali Nasr described it to Hersh as a vicious organization suspected of links to al Qaeda. The article said U.S. support for the dissident groups could prompt a violent crackdown by Iran, which could give the Bush administration a reason to intervene. None of the Democratic leaders in Congress would comment on the finding, the article said. The White House, which has repeatedly denied preparing for military action against Iran, and the CIA also declined comment. The United States is leading international efforts to rein in Iran's suspected effort to develop nuclear weapons, although Washington concedes Iran has the right to develop nuclear power for civilian uses. '--------------------------------------------------------------------------*--------------------------------- http://NEOCONZIONISTTHREAT.BLOGSPOT.COM http://NOMOREWARFORISRAEL.BLOGSPOT.COM -------------------------------------------------------- June 28, 2008 America Is the Rogue Nation by Charley Reese One gets the impression that there are some people in Washington who believe that Israel or the U.S. can bomb Iran's nuclear reactors, fly home, and it will be mission complete. It makes you wonder if perhaps there is a virus going around that is gradually making people stupid. If we or Israel attack Iran, we will have a new war on our hands. The Iranians are not going to shrug off an attack and say, "You naughty boys, you." Consider how much trouble Iraq has given us. Some 4,000 dead and 29,000 wounded, a half a trillion dollars in cost and still climbing, and five years later, we cannot say that the country is pacified. Iraq is a small country compared with Iran. Iran has about 70 million people. Its western mountains border the Persian Gulf. In other words, its missiles and guns look down on the U.S. ships below it. And it has lots of missiles, from short-range to intermediate-range (around 2,200 kilometers). More to the point, it has been equipped by Russia with the fastest anti-ship missile on the planet. The SS-N-22 Sunburn can travel at Mach 3 at high altitude and at Mach 2.2 at low altitude. That is faster than anything in our arsenal. Iran's conventional forces include an army of 540,000 men and 300,000 reserves, including 120,000 Iranian Guards especially trained in unconventional warfare. It has more than 1,600 main battle tanks and 21,000 other armored combat vehicles. It has 3,200 artillery pieces, three submarines, 59 surface warships and 10 amphibious ships. It's been receiving help in arming itself from China, North Korea and Russia. Unlike Iraq, Iran's forces have not been worn down with bombing, wars and sanctions. It also has a new anti-aircraft defense system from Russia that I've heard is pretty snazzy. So, if you think we or Israel can attack Iran and not expect retaliation, I'd have to say with regret that you are a moron. If you think we could easily handle Iran in an all-out war, I'd have to promote you to idiot. Attacking Iran would be folly, but we seem to be living in the Age of Folly. Morons and idiots took us into an unjustified war against Iraq before we had finished the job in Afghanistan. Now we have troops tied down in both countries. For some years now, I've worried that we seem to be more and more like Colonial England – arrogant, racist, overestimating our own capacity and underestimating that of our enemies. As the fate of the British Empire demonstrates, that is a fatal flaw. The British never dreamed that the "little yellow people" could come ashore by land and take Singapore from the rear or that they would sink the pride of the British fleet, but they did both. I suppose no one in Washington can imagine the Iranians sinking one of our carriers in the Persian Gulf. How'd you like to be the president who has to tell the American people that we've lost a carrier for the first time since World War II? Exactly how the Iranians will respond to an attack, I don't know, but they will respond. In keeping with our present policy, our attack on Iran would be illegal, since under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Iran has the right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes. Who would have thought that we would become the rogue nation committing acts of aggression around the globe? Find this article at:http://www.antiwar.com/reese/?articleid=13061 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Preparing the Battlefied: Bush Adminstration steps up its secretmoves against Iran
On Jul 1, 1:57*am, NOMOREWARFORISRAEL
wrote: Hersh: Congress Agreed to Bush Request to Fund Major Escalation in Secret Operations Against Iran: http://www.democracynow.org/2008/6/3...reed_to_bush_r... AIPAC pushing US to war with Iran for Israel: http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot....c-is-pushing-u... Stop the AIPAC sponsored 'Iran war' legislation calling for a blockade of Iran (to get the war with Iran going for Israel): http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0...ic.php?t=91563 Chris Hedges: Insane to attack Iran: http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot....its-insane-to-... Bob Barr: Attacking Iran Highly Irresponsible & Detrimental http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot....r-attacking-ir... A Clean Break/war for Israel agenda: http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot....ean-break.html Check out the question for Scott McClellan about how the JINSA (Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs) crowd pushed US to attack Iraq for Israel and are now doing similar to get US to attack Iran (how many more Americans have to die/get horribly maimed for this perpetual war for Israel agenda?): http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot....cclellan-quest... McCain is a serving Israel first traitor to America: http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot....ople-aware-sub... Israeli threat spikes our oil prices and crashes our stock market: http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot....-threat-spikes... Would it be possible (if it isn't too late to already) to conduct a House hearing with Flynt Leverett after what he mentioned at New America about the Bush regime perpetuating fraud over Iran (a youtube of Flynt conveying such is daisy-chained after the initial youtube about the disgraceful interview that '60 Minutes' did with Ahmadinejad via the following link)?: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onNzr...List&p=181923B... The following article appeared in the 'Daily Star' in Lebanon: Bush could do himself a favor by heeding Iran's warnings: http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article....ticle_id=93662.... Here is the URL for the Bromwich piece: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-...o-bush-and-che... On Jun 29, 4:06*pm, NOMOREWARFORISRAEL wrote: Forwarded: Preparing the Battlefield The Bush Administration steps up its secret moves against Iran. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2...7fa_fact_hersh Did you see the recent Reuters piece about the covert operations that the US has been involved with in Iraq according to Seymour Hersh as he has an article about such in latest issue of the New Yorker (see the link above). I had tried to get Lara Logan (chief foreign correspondent for the CBS Evening News) to do a segment about the US sponsorship of such and was also in touch with Michael Ware of CNN trying to get him to cover such as well (to no avail with him either). Based on the following Huffingtonpost.com URL I can assume that both Lara and Michael had other matters on their minds: Lara Logan, Michael Ware Involved In Steamy Baghdad Love Triangle: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/0...hael-ware-i_n_... Friend General Janis Karpinski of Abu Ghraib had told me that she was in charge of guarding the MEK in Iraq and that Condi Rice was in the loop with such as well.. The following article is most interesting as well (note the Israeli mention): Subverting Iran: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...cle&code=20070... Here is a tiny URL of the above one: http://tinyurl.com/yop927 Richard Perle of the 'JINSA crowd' has supported the MEK as well: http://gorillaintheroom.blogspot.com...group-to-hold-... Here is a tiny URL of the above the one: http://tinyurl.com/5rfz5m Here is the Reuters article (couldn't locate a URL yet though but will post one if I can find one!): U.S. escalating covert operations against Iran - report (Reuters) 2 hours, 40 minutes ago U.S. congressional leaders agreed late last year to President George W. Bush's funding request for a major escalation of covert operations against Iran aimed at destabilizing its leadership, according to a report in The New Yorker magazine published online on Sunday. The article by reporter Seymour Hersh, from the magazine's July 7 and 14 issue, centers around a highly classified Presidential Finding signed by Bush which by U.S. law must be made known to Democratic and Republican House and Senate leaders and ranking members of the intelligence committees. "The Finding was focused on undermining Iran's nuclear ambitions and trying to undermine the government through regime change," the article cited a person familiar with its contents as saying, and involved "working with opposition groups and passing money." Hersh has written previously about possible administration plans to go to war to stop Tehran from obtaining nuclear weapons, including an April 2006 article in the New Yorker that suggested regime change in Iran, whether by diplomatic or military means, was Bush's ultimate goal. Funding for the covert escalation, for which Bush requested up to $400 million, was approved by congressional leaders, according to the article, citing current and former military, intelligence and congressional sources. Clandestine operations against Iran are not new. U.S. Special Operations Forces have been conducting crossborder operations from southern Iraq since last year, the article said. These have included seizing members of Al Quds, the commando arm of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, and taking them to Iraq for interrogation, and the pursuit of "high-value targets" in Bush's war on terrorism, who may be captured or killed, according to the article. But the scale and the scope of the operations in Iran, which include the Central Intelligence Agency, have now been significantly expanded, the article said, citing current and former officials. Many of these activities are not specified in the new finding, and some congressional leaders have had serious questions about their nature, it said. Among groups inside Iran benefiting from U.S. support is the Jundallah, also known as the Iranian People's Resistance Movement, according to former CIA officer Robert Baer. Council on Foreign Relations analyst Vali Nasr described it to Hersh as a vicious organization suspected of links to al Qaeda. The article said U.S. support for the dissident groups could prompt a violent crackdown by Iran, which could give the Bush administration a reason to intervene. None of the Democratic leaders in Congress would comment on the finding, the article said. The White House, which has repeatedly denied preparing for military action against Iran, and the CIA also declined comment. The United States is leading international efforts to rein in Iran's suspected effort to develop nuclear weapons, although Washington concedes Iran has the right to develop nuclear power for civilian uses. '--------------------------------------------------------------------------**--------------------------------- http://NEOCONZIONISTTHREAT.BLOGSPOT.COM http://NOMOREWARFORISRAEL.BLOGSPOT.COM -------------------------------------------------------- June 28, 2008 America Is the Rogue Nation by Charley Reese One gets the impression that there are some people in Washington who believe that Israel or the U.S. can bomb Iran's nuclear reactors, fly home, and it will be mission complete. It makes you wonder if perhaps there is a virus going around that is gradually making people stupid. If we or Israel attack Iran, we will have a new war on our hands. The Iranians are not going to shrug off an attack and say, "You naughty boys, you." Consider how much trouble Iraq has given us. Some 4,000 dead and 29,000 wounded, a half a trillion dollars in cost and still climbing, and five years later, we cannot say that the country is pacified. Iraq is a small country compared with Iran. Iran has about 70 million people. Its western mountains border the Persian Gulf. In other words, its missiles and guns look down on the U.S. ships below it. And it has lots of missiles, from short-range to intermediate-range (around 2,200 kilometers). More to the point, it has been equipped by Russia with the fastest anti-ship missile on the planet. The SS-N-22 Sunburn can travel at Mach 3 at high altitude and at Mach 2.2 at low altitude. That is faster than anything in our arsenal. Iran's conventional forces include an army of 540,000 men and 300,000 reserves, including 120,000 Iranian Guards especially trained in unconventional warfare. It has more than 1,600 main battle tanks and 21,000 other armored combat vehicles. It has 3,200 artillery pieces, three submarines, 59 surface warships and 10 amphibious ships. It's been receiving help in arming itself from China, North Korea and Russia. Unlike Iraq, Iran's forces have not been worn down with bombing, wars and sanctions. It also has a new anti-aircraft defense system from Russia that I've heard is pretty snazzy. So, if you think we or Israel can attack Iran and not expect retaliation, I'd have to say with regret that you are a moron. If you think we could easily handle Iran in an all-out war, I'd have to promote you to idiot. Attacking Iran would be folly, but we seem to be living in the Age of Folly. Morons and idiots took us into an unjustified war against Iraq before we had finished the job in Afghanistan. Now we have troops tied down in ... read more »- Hide quoted text - Wow that's a lot of activity. Amazing work! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bush 'all options are on the table' for Iran | NOMOREWARFORISRAEL[_2_] | Naval Aviation | 2 | June 11th 08 06:41 PM |
Iran is preparing for an underground nuclear test with North Korean help before year's end | AirRaid Mach 2.5 | Naval Aviation | 19 | March 19th 07 04:21 AM |
Bush all set to attack Iran: Report | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 6 | February 26th 07 01:42 AM |
Bush denies preparing attack against Iran | AirRaid | Naval Aviation | 4 | January 27th 07 03:40 AM |
Bush OK's Israel Attack on Iran | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | November 10th 06 01:41 PM |