If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Garmin 396 Weather avoidance..
I agree completely with akiley here.
To me, the 396's value is in adding more detail to what's already available. Especially in terms of calibrating your eyeballs. If you try to stay in the clear as much as possible and use the 396 to add dimensions to what you see (and hear from ATC/pireps), you'll find it a tremendous aid. Having said that, any hard rules about flying thru purple and never flying thru fuscia are generalizations at best. It's all about getting the big picture, forecasts, actual, trends, and filling in the details. Rain in non-convective conditions is completely different from convective rain. Sometimes the value is all about being able to see what's going on beyond that wall of clouds in front of you. One of my early experiences flying north out of FL into Savannah - I swear I was doing better with the 396 than the guys with onboard radar. What I was seeing was probably less important to them than to me but being able to see around corners enabled me to make the best fuel stop while they seemed more dependent on ATC advice. Pretty amazing when compared to pre-396 days. akiley wrote: Dan wrote: For those of you with a Garmin 396, how do you avoid dangerous weather, avoid yellow and steer clear of the lightning strike indications? I am considering the purchase of one and am wondering how to use the info safely, but yet with the maximum utility. a cloud that hadn't produced rain yet. My solution is to try to stay either above to see the buildups, or below and avoid the rain shafts. But the 396 can also be used to find areas of less cloud cover and lower tops. The echo tops have that feature where you can scroll through the altitudes and watch where cloud appears. Then you can just look for the holes in the regular satellite display. So to me the trick it so combine all these: The 396 weather features, what image ATC is painting, the overall weather picture to determine if the ingredients for convection are there, what you see out the window, PIREPS and ride reports, tactical weather flying to try to keep yourself visual as much as possible. Green or yellow may be fine on days when you know there is little chance of buildups. But if green is next to a steep gradient of yellow, into orange to red. Steer clear. I think the 396 is an amazing tool. You can sit on the ground in your airplane and it's almost like having the internet in your lap. I sat on the ramp at Midway a few weeks ago and waited for a hole in the weather using the 396. I practice with Elite simulator which will now drive your 396 plugged into a serial port. I can put the satellite antenna out the window to get real weather, download through Elite and the internet real weather, and I can do near real time weather practice sim flying. And you get a great automotive navigator for a few extra bucks. ... akiley |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Garmin 396 Weather avoidance..
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 11:51:13 -0700, "Bob Gardner"
wrote: That's not what the NWS web page says, and it's not what I was told by the local NWS folks. The whole discussion at the NATCA "Communicating for Safety" conference had to do with the delays between real-time and WARP experienced by Center controllers. One point made was that Radar and Weather Processing involves (duh) processing, and six seconds was never mentioned. There was a news segment the other night on the next generation RADAR. The researcher made the statement, that when they get it working they will have "real time" images that are only ten to 15 seconds old instead of the current 5 minutes. And here I thought my weather service that said current really meant current. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com Something is missing here, and I'm not sure where to look. But I have a ZSE controller I can check with. Bob Gardner "Newps" wrote in message ... I'm not aware of ATC displaying NEXRAD although I suppose it's possible. We display real time weather in the TRACON up to six seconds old. Ronnie wrote: Bob, Was this a center or approach control facility and more specifically, was the weather info display primary or NEXRAD? If NEXRAD, did they discuss the amount of delay in the weather info on the controller's display? I'm wondering if it is significantly shorter? I know the satellite broadcast distribution adds some additional delay, but as I undersrand it, NEXRAD radar systems take a few minutes to build the composite view from several sweeps. Point is, the controller's display may be a few minutes old as well. Also, as you point out, the weather chances quickly and the radar is only showing precip. Thus, it is not showing the radid air currents of a developing storm. Until you have experienced being sucked up into a radily developing convective storm by flying through an area that your StrikeFinder and ATC agreed was the best path, you don't fully appreciate how danerous this type of weather can be. I second your recommendation to stay well clear of this type of weather. Ronnie "Bob Gardner" wrote in message . .. The first thing you need to understand is that the weather you see on the 396 is several minutes old...possibly as much as eleven minutes. So you need to watch the display and figure out which way the echoes are going, and plan on passing them on the upwind side. Then you need to realize that radar reflects only decent size rain droplets, not vertical currents, not the tops of clouds, not turbulence. Bottom line is: Stay well clear of anything green...yellow and red go without saying. If you have to get into the green, make the incursion as short as possible. Saw a revealing presentation at a NATCA controller's conference. They showed a slide with several large cells being displayed, and indicated the position of a 172 when the scenario began. The pilot told the controller that if he could have a certain heading, he would be clear of the cell he saw on his screen and could proceed to his destination. Unfortunately, by the time he got to the geographical area which was nice and clear on his cockpit display at the time he asked for the heading, the cell had moved directly into his path with predictable results. The message to the controllers in attendance was "What the pilot sees in the cockpit and real life are two different things." Bob Gardner "Dan" wrote in message legroups.com... For those of you with a Garmin 396, how do you avoid dangerous weather, avoid yellow and steer clear of the lightning strike indications? I am considering the purchase of one and am wondering how to use the info safely, but yet with the maximum utility. Dan |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Garmin 396 Weather avoidance..
Bob Gardner wrote:
I'm guessing that a very small percentage of those who frequent this newsgroup fly airplanes with onboard weather radar. OTOH, there are hundreds if not thousands who have multifunction displays. My comments are directed to that group. Whatever. That doesn't change the fact that only airbrorne weather radar displays real-time echos. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Garmin 396 Weather avoidance..
Bob Gardner wrote: That's not what the NWS web page says, and it's not what I was told by the local NWS folks. The whole discussion at the NATCA "Communicating for Safety" conference had to do with the delays between real-time and WARP experienced by Center controllers. One point made was that Radar and Weather Processing involves (duh) processing, and six seconds was never mentioned. Something is missing here, and I'm not sure where to look. But I have a ZSE controller I can check with. That's the center. Their display is a mosaic of many radar sites. Ask your center buddy how often center weather radar gets updated. However when you are talking to an approach or tower controller with radar, that updates every six seconds. There's no processing. What I see is what's there. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Garmin 396 Weather avoidance..
Newps wrote:
Bob Gardner wrote: That's not what the NWS web page says, and it's not what I was told by the local NWS folks. The whole discussion at the NATCA "Communicating for Safety" conference had to do with the delays between real-time and WARP experienced by Center controllers. One point made was that Radar and Weather Processing involves (duh) processing, and six seconds was never mentioned. Something is missing here, and I'm not sure where to look. But I have a ZSE controller I can check with. That's the center. Their display is a mosaic of many radar sites. Ask your center buddy how often center weather radar gets updated. However when you are talking to an approach or tower controller with radar, that updates every six seconds. There's no processing. What I see is what's there. What about a TRACON with STARS? |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Garmin 396 Weather avoidance..
http://www.faa.gov/aua/weather/warp/
Read the first paragraph. Bob "Newps" wrote in message . .. I'm not aware of ATC displaying NEXRAD although I suppose it's possible. We display real time weather in the TRACON up to six seconds old. Ronnie wrote: Bob, Was this a center or approach control facility and more specifically, was the weather info display primary or NEXRAD? If NEXRAD, did they discuss the amount of delay in the weather info on the controller's display? I'm wondering if it is significantly shorter? I know the satellite broadcast distribution adds some additional delay, but as I undersrand it, NEXRAD radar systems take a few minutes to build the composite view from several sweeps. Point is, the controller's display may be a few minutes old as well. Also, as you point out, the weather chances quickly and the radar is only showing precip. Thus, it is not showing the radid air currents of a developing storm. Until you have experienced being sucked up into a radily developing convective storm by flying through an area that your StrikeFinder and ATC agreed was the best path, you don't fully appreciate how danerous this type of weather can be. I second your recommendation to stay well clear of this type of weather. Ronnie "Bob Gardner" wrote in message . .. The first thing you need to understand is that the weather you see on the 396 is several minutes old...possibly as much as eleven minutes. So you need to watch the display and figure out which way the echoes are going, and plan on passing them on the upwind side. Then you need to realize that radar reflects only decent size rain droplets, not vertical currents, not the tops of clouds, not turbulence. Bottom line is: Stay well clear of anything green...yellow and red go without saying. If you have to get into the green, make the incursion as short as possible. Saw a revealing presentation at a NATCA controller's conference. They showed a slide with several large cells being displayed, and indicated the position of a 172 when the scenario began. The pilot told the controller that if he could have a certain heading, he would be clear of the cell he saw on his screen and could proceed to his destination. Unfortunately, by the time he got to the geographical area which was nice and clear on his cockpit display at the time he asked for the heading, the cell had moved directly into his path with predictable results. The message to the controllers in attendance was "What the pilot sees in the cockpit and real life are two different things." Bob Gardner "Dan" wrote in message egroups.com... For those of you with a Garmin 396, how do you avoid dangerous weather, avoid yellow and steer clear of the lightning strike indications? I am considering the purchase of one and am wondering how to use the info safely, but yet with the maximum utility. Dan |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Garmin 396 Weather avoidance..
OK. Apples and oranges. Way back at the beginning of this thread we were
talking about using an [airborne] 396 weather display. The information sent to cockpits, installed or handheld, is NEXRAD-based, and I jumped in to emphasize the point that real-time weather does not exist in the cockpit unless you have airborne weather radar, which few have. Now, all of a sudden, you chime in with what you see at a terminal facility? Without disclosing the kind of facility you work at? For those late to the discussion, look at this: http://www.faa.gov/aua/weather/warp/ Bob Gardner "Newps" wrote in message . .. Bob Gardner wrote: That's not what the NWS web page says, and it's not what I was told by the local NWS folks. The whole discussion at the NATCA "Communicating for Safety" conference had to do with the delays between real-time and WARP experienced by Center controllers. One point made was that Radar and Weather Processing involves (duh) processing, and six seconds was never mentioned. Something is missing here, and I'm not sure where to look. But I have a ZSE controller I can check with. That's the center. Their display is a mosaic of many radar sites. Ask your center buddy how often center weather radar gets updated. However when you are talking to an approach or tower controller with radar, that updates every six seconds. There's no processing. What I see is what's there. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Garmin 396 Weather avoidance..
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 18:24:20 -0700, "Bob Gardner"
wrote: http://www.faa.gov/aua/weather/warp/ Read the first paragraph. Which if I understand right is about 5 minutes old by the time the images are processed. This is the same "real time" stuff I get in my subscription service. "Real Time" in this context meaning as soon as they get it processed. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com Bob "Newps" wrote in message ... I'm not aware of ATC displaying NEXRAD although I suppose it's possible. We display real time weather in the TRACON up to six seconds old. Ronnie wrote: Bob, Was this a center or approach control facility and more specifically, was the weather info display primary or NEXRAD? If NEXRAD, did they discuss the amount of delay in the weather info on the controller's display? I'm wondering if it is significantly shorter? I know the satellite broadcast distribution adds some additional delay, but as I undersrand it, NEXRAD radar systems take a few minutes to build the composite view from several sweeps. Point is, the controller's display may be a few minutes old as well. Also, as you point out, the weather chances quickly and the radar is only showing precip. Thus, it is not showing the radid air currents of a developing storm. Until you have experienced being sucked up into a radily developing convective storm by flying through an area that your StrikeFinder and ATC agreed was the best path, you don't fully appreciate how danerous this type of weather can be. I second your recommendation to stay well clear of this type of weather. Ronnie "Bob Gardner" wrote in message . .. The first thing you need to understand is that the weather you see on the 396 is several minutes old...possibly as much as eleven minutes. So you need to watch the display and figure out which way the echoes are going, and plan on passing them on the upwind side. Then you need to realize that radar reflects only decent size rain droplets, not vertical currents, not the tops of clouds, not turbulence. Bottom line is: Stay well clear of anything green...yellow and red go without saying. If you have to get into the green, make the incursion as short as possible. Saw a revealing presentation at a NATCA controller's conference. They showed a slide with several large cells being displayed, and indicated the position of a 172 when the scenario began. The pilot told the controller that if he could have a certain heading, he would be clear of the cell he saw on his screen and could proceed to his destination. Unfortunately, by the time he got to the geographical area which was nice and clear on his cockpit display at the time he asked for the heading, the cell had moved directly into his path with predictable results. The message to the controllers in attendance was "What the pilot sees in the cockpit and real life are two different things." Bob Gardner "Dan" wrote in message legroups.com... For those of you with a Garmin 396, how do you avoid dangerous weather, avoid yellow and steer clear of the lightning strike indications? I am considering the purchase of one and am wondering how to use the info safely, but yet with the maximum utility. Dan |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Garmin 396 Weather avoidance..
On 9 Jun 2006 17:04:28 -0700, "Robert M. Gary"
wrote: I wish I had an easy answer for you. However, wx is a non-trivial subject. There are two ways you can make use of your 396 in wx. First, you can fly with a CFI who is experienced in flying cross country. Second you can start out very, very conservative and learn as you go how the wx on your 396 affects your flight. My take on this and I've been storm chasing longer than we've had Loran, let alone down linked RADAR. I've seen 5 tornados and one really big water spout. I even managed to get caught outdoors along with two of my neighbors, in a little F-1 and that can certainly raise your sense of awareness. The 396 has some advantages and disadvantages when compared to airborne RADAR. Starting with the good, it does not have the blind spots you will find from time to time in airborne RADAR caused by absorption in heavy precipitation which can hide some nasty stuff. OTOH if you keep in mind that the display is probably 5 minutes old or a tad more AND you have been following it you can pick your course. However I agree with Robert. Take a conservative approach and learn to interpret what you are seeing on the display, how to track, and how to predict. Learn to follow both cell and frontal movement. They are rarely the same. Usually the cells are traveling at right angles to the front, but NOT ALWAYS. Learn to identify upper level winds by the rain blown off creating plumes that may or may not go in the direction of the front or cells. You normally want to stay away from those plumes as they may contain hail and that can be as much as 5 to 10 miles ahead of the storm at altitude. Speaking of hail and altitude, you really don't want to run into hail in front of a cell at altitude. It is a *lot* larger than what we see at ground level. BTW when on the ground and in front of an approaching storm. If the wind is blowing toward the storm that is "inflow" and a sign of a storm with very strong convective activity. Once you learn to determine cell movement, remember that cells can "pop up" behind the ones you are watching. Has the storm shown a tendency for cells to pop up along, ahead of, or behind the front. Are the cells associated with frontal movement or a general wide spread instability? Knowing the storm and front movement, speed and direction along with the knowledge the information you are seeing is at least 5 minutes old would certainly tell me I would want to give a lot of space when flying in front of the front or cells. OTOH Cells growing up along a line may start to pop up on the "up wind" side of current activity. Some times the growth of this line can be a real surprise and it can contain some really nasty stuff. As was said earlier. Get all the information available about the activity and area through which you will be flying. Then use that information along with what the RADAR is showing. A storm scope can be really helpful in extending your "real time" knowledge of what is going on and should be a good indicator of where those RADAR images are headed as well as what to expect from them. Just remember that conservative approach. -Robert, CFI Dan wrote: For those of you with a Garmin 396, how do you avoid dangerous weather, avoid yellow and steer clear of the lightning strike indications? I am Yellow and even red may not indicate anything other than heavy rain if it's not associated with convective activity. You learn what you are seeing, where it is compared to the display, and where it is going. Then stay out of its way. All this takes practice and liberal use of FSS can help. Good Luck, Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com considering the purchase of one and am wondering how to use the info safely, but yet with the maximum utility. Dan |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Garmin 396 Weather avoidance..
Bob Gardner wrote:
OK. Apples and oranges. Way back at the beginning of this thread we were talking about using an [airborne] 396 weather display. The information sent to cockpits, installed or handheld, is NEXRAD-based, and I jumped in to emphasize the point that real-time weather does not exist in the cockpit unless you have airborne weather radar, which few have. Now, all of a sudden, you chime in with what you see at a terminal facility? Without disclosing the kind of facility you work at? \ My recollection is that he has told the group more than once that he works at Billings TRACON. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Amateur Review of the Garmin GPSMAP 296 GPS | Rhett | Piloting | 10 | March 23rd 05 01:16 AM |
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) | Jon Woellhaf | Piloting | 12 | September 4th 04 11:55 PM |
Garmin 430 Terrain Avoidance | endre | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | July 22nd 04 03:41 AM |
FA: WEATHER FLYING: A PRACTICAL BOOK ON FLYING | The Ink Company | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 5th 03 12:07 AM |