If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
I wish I had never gotten into this...
Kate referred to math.
She implied a substitute therefor. She gave testimony, providing her insight, and expert testimony on feminine logic. That may of course be a contradictory concept, a conundrum, worth arguing on fact; but, of no use in argument with the fairer sex. Without stating so, feminine logic was offered up to be superior to or the superlative to the need for math. Would that be The New Math, Miss Kate? Is it that: The Math That Rules is Feminine Math. That is your premise . Being that the fairer sex is inately self-regulating and self-ministering, being it continues incessant locution and changing and ranging opinion, being it forever postulates and discusses with feminine cooperatives, who speak at the same time, being that the fairer sex defines the order of things, makes the rules, and keeps the score. And it seems that guys drool; and just want more; and never know what's the score ? Girls rule ? Evermore ? The New Math. A feminine construct . With kindest obedience, I remain subject. Dancing on clouds, Keep it up! Jim Culp USA GatorCity, Florida Std Libelle |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|