OSH to get new control tower

Got a mailing from the FAA this week requesting comments on a proposed,
new, non-fed control tower to be built at OSH.
Airspace Case No.: 05-AGL-8-NR
The proposed new tower is to be 146 feet AGL/948 feet MSL to be located
at these coordinates: N 43-58-54.05, W 88-33-47.28. (Anyone have a topo
that can tell us where on the field that will be?)
Deadline for comments is 27 June 2005.

jsmith wrote:
Got a mailing from the FAA this week requesting comments on a proposed,
new, non-fed control tower to be built at OSH.
Airspace Case No.: 05-AGL-8-NR
The proposed new tower is to be 146 feet AGL/948 feet MSL to be located
at these coordinates: N 43-58-54.05, W 88-33-47.28. (Anyone have a topo
that can tell us where on the field that will be?)
Deadline for comments is 27 June 2005.

http://www.naco.faa.gov/content/naco...ms/00730AD.PDF

By eyeball, that's pretty close to where the existing tower is. DGB

Dave Butler wrote:
jsmith wrote:

Got a mailing from the FAA this week requesting comments on a
proposed, new, non-fed control tower to be built at OSH.
Airspace Case No.: 05-AGL-8-NR
The proposed new tower is to be 146 feet AGL/948 feet MSL to be
located at these coordinates: N 43-58-54.05, W 88-33-47.28. (Anyone
have a topo that can tell us where on the field that will be?)
Deadline for comments is 27 June 2005.

http://www.naco.faa.gov/content/naco...ms/00730AD.PDF

By eyeball, that's pretty close to where the existing tower is. DGB

It was my understanding that it's going to be about two blocks farther
west than where the current tower is (and taller)

jsmith wrote:

Got a mailing from the FAA this week requesting comments on a proposed,
new, non-fed control tower to be built at OSH.
Airspace Case No.: 05-AGL-8-NR
The proposed new tower is to be 146 feet AGL/948 feet MSL to be located
at these coordinates: N 43-58-54.05, W 88-33-47.28. (Anyone have a topo
that can tell us where on the field that will be?)
Deadline for comments is 27 June 2005.


Those coordinates map to here on this aerial photo,

http://airplanezone.com/NewsgroupPix/New_Tower.jpg


David O

jsmith wrote:

Got a mailing from the FAA this week requesting comments on a proposed,
new, non-fed control tower to be built at OSH.
Airspace Case No.: 05-AGL-8-NR
The proposed new tower is to be 146 feet AGL/948 feet MSL to be located
at these coordinates: N 43-58-54.05, W 88-33-47.28. (Anyone have a topo
that can tell us where on the field that will be?)
Deadline for comments is 27 June 2005.


That's interesting that there sending out this mailing - they broke
ground during Airventure last year, my understanding it should almost
be completed by now.

http://www.fly-low.com/feataug04/ct.html

Seems a kind of far back from the runway.

Looking at that photo, it looks like its the area where the "nursing
hangar" is, if memory serves, along with emergency services? What kind
of "security zone" are they going to put around it then? close off the
street? make zoom move his trailer?

John

John T wrote:
Seems a kind of far back from the runway.

Looking at that photo, it looks like its the area where the "nursing
hangar" is, if memory serves, along with emergency services? What kind
of "security zone" are they going to put around it then? close off the
street? make zoom move his trailer?

Actually, it's further back than that I think. But remember there
are more runways than 18-36 at OSH (in addition to 9-27, there are
two diagonals that are NOT used during AirVenture). Also remember
that the runways themselves aren't the whole problem, ground control
seeing the movement area is also a problem

"jsmith" wrote in message ...
Got a mailing from the FAA this week requesting comments on a proposed, new, non-fed control tower to be built at OSH.
Airspace Case No.: 05-AGL-8-NR
The proposed new tower is to be 146 feet AGL/948 feet MSL to be located at these coordinates: N 43-58-54.05, W
88-33-47.28. (Anyone have a topo that can tell us where on the field that will be?)
Deadline for comments is 27 June 2005.



I hope they save the old one as an observation area...

It has to be farther back because of the increase in height and
protection of the airspace surfaces. Specifically, a 7:1 transition area
slope from the runway centerline. For every one-foot vertical, you have
to move seven-feet horizontally from the reference. 148*7=1036 feet from
the centerline (minimum). This is all spelled out in TERPS.

John T wrote:
Seems a kind of far back from the runway.

john smith wrote:

It has to be farther back because of the increase in height and
protection of the airspace surfaces. Specifically, a 7:1 transition area
slope from the runway centerline. For every one-foot vertical, you have
to move seven-feet horizontally from the reference. 148*7=1036 feet from
the centerline (minimum). This is all spelled out in TERPS.

Not entirely true. We are getting a new tower here at BIL. It is 40
something feet taller than our current one. It is also only a few
hundred feet off the centerline of one of the runways, much closer than
before.