If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Cessna 172 with Wild Fuel Gauge Needle
Anybody know the reason for this? The needle on the pilot's side is
stable, but the needle on the co-pilot side swings wildly, especially when the tank is full. A float moves the needle around the dial. Why doesn't it stay still and be good like its brother? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In article , " jls"
wrote: Anybody know the reason for this? The needle on the pilot's side is stable, but the needle on the co-pilot side swings wildly, especially when the tank is full. A float moves the needle around the dial. Why doesn't it stay still and be good like its brother? loose connection somewhere? -- Bob Noel |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:59:47 -0500, jls wrote:
Anybody know the reason for this? The needle on the pilot's side is stable, but the needle on the co-pilot side swings wildly, especially when the tank is full. A float moves the needle around the dial. Why doesn't it stay still and be good like its brother? There was a service bulletin for the fuel sensor in the late model Cessnas (don't know the number). Last winter, almost all of the 172s at our club would exhibit the same problem. This winter (after a few 100-hour and annual inspections) none that I have been flying are acting bad. It used to be quite a nuisance. -- Rick/JYO PP-ASEL-IA remove 'nospam' to reply |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
" jls" wrote in message news Anybody know the reason for this? The needle on the pilot's side is stable, but the needle on the co-pilot side swings wildly, especially when the tank is full. A float moves the needle around the dial. Why doesn't it stay still and be good like its brother? It probably is a bad sending unit, especially if it is a late model 172. You can replace the sending units, but they just go bad again. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I would never trust a fuel guage. I was taught to alway visually check and
know the aircrafts fuel usage. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Larryskydives" wrote in message ... I would never trust a fuel guage. I was taught to alway visually check and know the aircrafts fuel usage. You were taught a very popular myth. No doubt you were also taught the myth (spread by Rod Machado and others) that your fuel gauge is only required to be accurate when it reads zero fuel. The FAR require you to have a fuel gauge that shows the quantity of fuel in each tank, whether you trust it or not. The reason you are to check the fuel in each tank is to see if your fuel gauge is accurate. If it is not accurate, your airplane is not airworthy. I think it is very strange for people to say that they do not trust a fuel gauge, but they trust other, equally unreliable instruments such as the ammeter, oil pressure and temperature, fuel flow, etc. Your fuel gauge must be accurate, no matter how good you are at estimating fuel flow and using your watch. Your fuel tank could leak, for example, or your fuel cap could come loose during flight. The only way that you would know that you are losing fuel would be from your fuel gauge, especially if you fly a high wing airplane or you are flying at night. The fuel line from one of your tanks could become blocked, creating an imbalance and effectively cutting your fuel supply in half. One of the most common fuel mismanagement accidents occurs when pilots switch to an empty tank. Your fuel gauge is a critical item of fuel management, possibly the most important one. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"C J Campbell" wrote in message ...
" jls" wrote in message news Anybody know the reason for this? The needle on the pilot's side is stable, but the needle on the co-pilot side swings wildly, especially when the tank is full. A float moves the needle around the dial. Why doesn't it stay still and be good like its brother? It probably is a bad sending unit, especially if it is a late model 172. You can replace the sending units, but they just go bad again. The earlier ones do it, too. They have a wirewound potentiometer that wears out and starts getting intermittent. Dan |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
If your fuel cap comes off in flight in your high wing Cessna you will
never be able to tell you are losing fuel by looking at your fuel gauge. The problem is so bad that 182's have to have a placard stating that. The problem is that the air flowing over the wing creates a suction from the tank that makes the gauge read full. C J Campbell wrote: "Larryskydives" wrote in message ... I would never trust a fuel guage. I was taught to alway visually check and know the aircrafts fuel usage. You were taught a very popular myth. No doubt you were also taught the myth (spread by Rod Machado and others) that your fuel gauge is only required to be accurate when it reads zero fuel. The FAR require you to have a fuel gauge that shows the quantity of fuel in each tank, whether you trust it or not. The reason you are to check the fuel in each tank is to see if your fuel gauge is accurate. If it is not accurate, your airplane is not airworthy. I think it is very strange for people to say that they do not trust a fuel gauge, but they trust other, equally unreliable instruments such as the ammeter, oil pressure and temperature, fuel flow, etc. Your fuel gauge must be accurate, no matter how good you are at estimating fuel flow and using your watch. Your fuel tank could leak, for example, or your fuel cap could come loose during flight. The only way that you would know that you are losing fuel would be from your fuel gauge, especially if you fly a high wing airplane or you are flying at night. The fuel line from one of your tanks could become blocked, creating an imbalance and effectively cutting your fuel supply in half. One of the most common fuel mismanagement accidents occurs when pilots switch to an empty tank. Your fuel gauge is a critical item of fuel management, possibly the most important one. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups result:
Your shorter link is: http://makeashorterlink.com/?D23212077 jls wrote: Anybody know the reason for this? The needle on the pilot's side is stable, but the needle on the co-pilot side swings wildly, especially when the tank is full. A float moves the needle around the dial. Why doesn't it stay still and be good like its brother? MikeM Skylane '1mm Pacer '00z |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
C J Campbell wrote:
You were taught a very popular myth. No doubt you were also taught the myth (spread by Rod Machado and others) that your fuel gauge is only required to be accurate when it reads zero fuel. The FAR require you to have a fuel gauge that shows the quantity of fuel in each tank, whether you trust it or not. Which FAR covers this? I can find the one that requires a fuel indicator, but nothing about accuracy. -- Jim Pennino Remove -spam-sux to reply. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Airplane Parts on Ebay Vac Reg Valves, Fuel Floats, O-200 Spider, Fuel Injection Valve | Bill Berle | Owning | 0 | January 26th 04 07:48 AM |
Jim Weir's Capacitive Fuel Gauge | Dave Bowman | Home Built | 0 | January 22nd 04 03:06 AM |
Yo! Fuel Tank! | Veeduber | Home Built | 15 | October 25th 03 02:57 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Hot weather and autogas? | Rich S. | Home Built | 33 | July 30th 03 11:25 PM |