If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
1 Fatal ...r.a.h or r.a.p?
6% of homebuilt accidents occur on the first flight.
Statistically, there is an 0.8% chance that a first flight will end in an accident. I think I'm just going to skip my homebuilt's first flight, and start on the second flight. ;-) -- Jim in NC |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
1 Fatal ...r.a.h or r.a.p?
6% of homebuilt accidents occur on the first flight.
Statistically, there is an 0.8% chance that a first flight will end in an accident. I think I'm just going to skip my homebuilt's first flight, and start on the second flight. ;-) Great idea Jim, why didn't they think of that? LOL. The Monk |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
1 Fatal ...r.a.h or r.a.p?
My "first flight" WAS my second flight...
I was "taxi testing" my RV-6 when I became airborne for about a hundred yards or so. Since I was not authorized to commit flight per the FAA obviously I had not flown.... right?? John Flyingmonk wrote: 6% of homebuilt accidents occur on the first flight. Statistically, there is an 0.8% chance that a first flight will end in an accident. I think I'm just going to skip my homebuilt's first flight, and start on the second flight. ;-) Great idea Jim, why didn't they think of that? LOL. The Monk |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
1 Fatal ...r.a.h or r.a.p?
"John Ammeter" wrote in message ... My "first flight" WAS my second flight... I was "taxi testing" my RV-6 when I became airborne for about a hundred yards or so. Since I was not authorized to commit flight per the FAA obviously I had not flown.... right?? John that makes me wonder, how does one report such a flight? technically you broke the rules, and if no one saw you do it, it must not have happened. but I like being an honest guy and would report myself anyway. what's the penalty? |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
1 Fatal ...r.a.h or r.a.p?
that makes me wonder, how does one report such a flight? technically you broke the rules, and if no one saw you do it, it must not have happened. but I like being an honest guy and would report myself anyway. what's the penalty? Take a telephone pole, and cut it of, so it is sticking out of the ground, about a foot and a half. Now, sit on it. Rotate side to side, and round and round, until your butt cheeks touch the ground. That is about like the penalty would be like. You obviously have not been around the FAA, very much. You don't tell them anything they don't ask. Period. -- Jim in NC |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
1 Fatal ...r.a.h or r.a.p?
Morgans wrote:
that makes me wonder, how does one report such a flight? technically you broke the rules, and if no one saw you do it, it must not have happened. but I like being an honest guy and would report myself anyway. what's the penalty? Take a telephone pole, and cut it of, so it is sticking out of the ground, about a foot and a half. Now, sit on it. Rotate side to side, and round and round, until your butt cheeks touch the ground. That is about like the penalty would be like. You obviously have not been around the FAA, very much. You don't tell them anything they don't ask. Period. And answer the question as they ask it. If they ask if you have a watch the answer is yes or no. You don't look at your watch and tell them what time it is. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
1 Fatal ...r.a.h or r.a.p?
Richard Lamb wrote:
Jerry Springer wrote: A good share of these stories are about factory built certified aircraft. Most kitbuilt aircraft now days are very safe. Jerry Only if they don't fly, Jerry... And there are a lot of homebuilts that hardly ever leave the ground. Richard Not sure what you mean they are safe only if they do not fly? Are you speaking of all aircraft in general or are you speaking only of experimental aircraft? If you read the "2004 Nall" report you will find that homebuilt aircraft have about the same rate of accidents as factory built aircraft do. Ron W posted some statistic that relate to first flight accidents, most of which are caused by fuel problems. This risk can be eliminated by proper fuel flow testing before the first flight IMO. To the Cessna 172 driver that asked for proof that homebuilt aircraft were safe please post you information saying they are not as safe as any other aircraft flying. I find that is mostly the uniformed that that have a preconceived notion that an aircraft built at home must not be as safe as factory built aircraft. Most homebuilders are very particulier and realize that it is their butts and their families and friends that will be flying in these creations. Jerry(flying my RV-6 over 16 years)Springer |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
1 Fatal ...r.a.h or r.a.p?
("Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired" wrote)
And answer the question as they ask it. If they ask if you have a watch the answer is yes or no. You don't look at your watch and tell them what time it is. I've been accused of telling people how to BUILD a watch, when all they really wanted was the time. g Montblack |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
1 Fatal ...r.a.h or r.a.p?
Jerry Springer wrote:
Richard Lamb wrote: Jerry Springer wrote: A good share of these stories are about factory built certified aircraft. Most kitbuilt aircraft now days are very safe. Jerry Only if they don't fly, Jerry... And there are a lot of homebuilts that hardly ever leave the ground. Richard Not sure what you mean they are safe only if they do not fly? Are you speaking of all aircraft in general or are you speaking only of experimental aircraft? If you read the "2004 Nall" report you will find that homebuilt aircraft have about the same rate of accidents as factory built aircraft do. Ron W posted some statistic that relate to first flight accidents, most of which are caused by fuel problems. This risk can be eliminated by proper fuel flow testing before the first flight IMO. To the Cessna 172 driver that asked for proof that homebuilt aircraft were safe please post you information saying they are not as safe as any other aircraft flying. I find that is mostly the uniformed that that have a preconceived notion that an aircraft built at home must not be as safe as factory built aircraft. Most homebuilders are very particulier and realize that it is their butts and their families and friends that will be flying in these creations. Jerry(flying my RV-6 over 16 years)Springer Easy Jerry, Didn't mean to offend (or frighten) anyone. Yes, among the RV gang, most of them DO fly - some a lot. But there are others who simply don't. And there are a significant fraction that almost NEVER fly. Now, according to Ron's statistics... Factory test flights don't seem to have the same kind of numbers. But, of course, YMMV... Richard |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
1 Fatal ...r.a.h or r.a.p?
Montblack wrote:
("Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired" wrote) And answer the question as they ask it. If they ask if you have a watch the answer is yes or no. You don't look at your watch and tell them what time it is. I've been accused of telling people how to BUILD a watch, when all they really wanted was the time. g Montblack Tell a man the time and you help him once, tell him to buy a watch and he bothers you no more. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
1 Fatal ...r.a.h or r.a.p? | Montblack | Piloting | 38 | February 9th 06 02:00 PM |
Fatal Injury: hit by the prop | [email protected] | Piloting | 43 | January 27th 05 04:26 PM |
Pilot's 2nd Fatal Accident | Aardvark | Piloting | 44 | May 21st 04 02:34 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |