If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:19:04 +0000, Mortimer Schnerd, RN wrote:
WE had one of our Lances crash at RDU one foggy morning that I believe was due to the pilot running one tank dry while on the ILS inbound from the outer marker. He hit the tops of the trees, spun around and down one and landed flat in a densely wooded area to the north of the field. The resulting fire destroyed the aircraft pretty completely. Fortunately, the pilot walked away from it with just a superficial cut on his forehead. Let me be clear here, I am not talking about accidentally running a tank dry. In fact, if done as Deakin and Cook prescribe, it probably would of prevented the accident you mention. He may have tried to restart but just didn't have enough time before he sank into the trees. Clean, a Lance will come down at 1100 FPM; it's gonna be considerably faster with the gear hanging out like it would after intercepting the glideslope. http://www8.landings.com/cgi-bin/nph...at&pos =71003 Again, this sounds like an accident caused by poor planning. This is not what I'm talking about. Poor fuel management is poor fuel management. Let's not confuse the two. Now, to get back to the first question: how often does one run a tank dry intentionally? If I was in a Cherokee Six with four tanks and had passengers, hopefully never. The downside of this is that if you left just a couple of estimated gallons in each tank, you have lost a significant amount of useful fuel. Deakin specifically addresses the issue with passengers on board. In his opinion, proper passenger briefing, a timer, and calm behavior on part of the pilot is key. If I were trying to stretch a flight and even then only if I were alone, I might consider running one dry. But I have to tell you: running a tank dry in a Cherokee results in te longest 30 seconds of your life. I ran a C-210 tank dry once and almost the second I hit the boost after switching the fuel selector I got a restart. Not so in the Cherokee... it takes a while. A loooong while. Kind of scarey. If you have not done so, please read his article and see what you think. I must say, my impression of your position is one of fear not one of reason. Am I wrong? I must admit, I certainly would not expect something like a 30-second delay. I would expect something more in line of a couple of seconds at most. Perhaps it was a could of seconds but felt like 30? Greg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Time, running out of fuel and fuel gauges | Dylan Smith | Piloting | 29 | February 3rd 08 07:04 PM |
Engine running again, the good, bad and ugly | Corky Scott | Home Built | 34 | July 6th 05 05:04 PM |
It's finally running! | Corky Scott | Home Built | 19 | April 29th 05 04:53 PM |
Rotax 503 won't stop running | Tracy | Home Built | 2 | March 28th 04 04:56 PM |
Leaving all engines running at the gate | John | Piloting | 12 | February 5th 04 03:46 AM |