A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

OLV GPS 36 approach question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20  
Old August 9th 06, 09:23 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Sam Spade
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,326
Default OLV GPS 36 approach question

wrote:
Not so with this past February's AIM and ATC procedure change:

You informed me of this change a month or two ago, but that doesn't
change the fact that published altitudes apply after arriving at the
IF. An assigned altitutde below an intermediate segment altitude would
be an error, as I think you'd agree.


I would agree, and if there were a step-down altitude in the
intermediate higher than 2,100, then the assignment would have been in
error.

But, in the circstances with this IAP, it was functionally no different
than "vectors to final" (i.e., the intermediate segment), which wouldn't
be any surprise to have done at 2,100 feet.

Having said that, because of the nuance of this new procedure, an
assignment to cross DOCAP at 2,800 would be better human-factors.

However, as I reviewed the original post, he said he was cleared to
DOCAP. In my mind, I pictured the right base entry, which is the one
that I usually make, but DOCAP is the IF/IAF and which makes it a
straight-in. The first published altitude IS (I think) 2,100, so the
controller didn't make an error after all. The 2,800 that the OP
mentioned was probably the straight in sector altitude, which becomes
irrelevant when cleared to the IF.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights Geoffrey Sinclair Military Aviation 3 September 4th 09 06:31 PM
Contact approach question Paul Tomblin Instrument Flight Rules 114 January 31st 05 06:40 PM
Approach Question- Published Missed Can't be flown? Brad Z Instrument Flight Rules 8 May 6th 04 04:19 AM
Where is the FAF on the GPS 23 approach to KUCP? Richard Kaplan Instrument Flight Rules 36 April 16th 04 12:41 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.