If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Prohibited Airspace Coming to a TRF Near You.
More military airspace grabs imminent: ------------------------------------------------------------- AOPA ePilot Volume 6, Issue 7 February 27, 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------- NAVY ASKS FOR PROHIBITED AREA IN GEORGIA At the Navy's insistence, the FAA on Thursday formally proposed turning the Department of Defense (DoD) temporary flight restriction (TFR) over the Kings Bay Naval Base in Georgia into prohibited airspace. The existing TFR has severely affected operations at St. Marys Airport in nearby St. Marys, Georgia. "This is a general aviation pilot's worst nightmare and has questionable security benefits," said AOPA President Phil Boyer. "The Pentagon is dictating national airspace policy. And it could get worse. AOPA has learned that the DoD has already submitted requests to turn the remaining permanent TFRs [elsewhere in the country] into prohibited areas." The comment deadline is April 12. See AOPA Online( http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/newsite...04-1-116x.html ). --------------------------------------------------------------------- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
... ------------------------------------------------------------- AOPA ePilot Volume 6, Issue 7 February 27, 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------- NAVY ASKS FOR PROHIBITED AREA IN GEORGIA At the Navy's insistence, the FAA on Thursday formally proposed turning the Department of Defense (DoD) temporary flight restriction (TFR) over the Kings Bay Naval Base in Georgia into prohibited airspace. [...] The comment deadline is April 12. See AOPA Online( http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/newsite...04-1-116x.html ). Well, I submitted my comments. There are already about 40 available for review at the document database website, and several are actually quite good. Not a single "in favor" comment yet, but if history serves, eventually there will be a few. We all need to submit our comments on this NPRM. Granted, it may not do any good, but you never know. It might. It certainly will serve to document the intense and widespread dislike of these restrictions, and the FAA's willingness to impose such restrictions with no valid justification, and plenty of good arguments against. It's easy to submit comments. If you don't want to follow the above link to the AOPA article and navigate through, just start right he http://dms.dot.gov/search/searchFormSimple.cfm In that form, enter this docket number: 15976 That will take you to the page with all of the documents related to the NPRM, included the NPRM itself. You can read the already-submitted comments. You can also provide your own comment simply by clicking the "Comments/Submissions" button at the top of the page. You don't need to register to provide a comment, nor do you even need to provide real information for yourself. However, IMHO there's no point in providing a comment unless you are willing to put your name to it. I can't imagine that anonymous comments carry much weight. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Must the PLANE be IFR-equipped to fly over17,500? | john smith | Home Built | 11 | August 27th 04 02:29 AM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
FAA: 157 airspace violations since 9/11 | AJ | Piloting | 26 | January 6th 04 12:59 AM |
Violating Airspace with GPS | John Bell | Piloting | 57 | November 5th 03 08:25 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |