If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
markjenn ) wrote:
They're not a bad idea on some aircraft, but Bonanzas, with their 154K gear speeds, really don't need them. In his Avweb articles (posted in this thread), John Deakin expressed the same opinion. The reason I was considering them had to do with the type of airports in which I fly. The majority of my flying is for Angel Flight Northeast, which brings me into Teterboro and Boston Logan frequently. If I could fly at 160-170 all the way to the outer marker, it would certainly make fitting in to the traffic flow much easier. But, cost is certainly an issue and if I am lacking in skills to slow the aircraft down, then this is something I should explore. I was going to take a Bonanza Proficiency course last October, but unfortunately a cylinder cracked and started this extended maintenance period. I also think that shock-cooling is an overrated thing, but that's another discussion. I am certainly too low time to have any experience with this, so I have to rely on others' experiences. The only fact that sort of sways me into the shock cooling camp is what Cape Air does with their Cessna 402s. The head of our local flight school used to fly with Cape Air and told me about their strict policy of using all drag-inducing devices to descend long before they reduce power. As a result of demonstrated engine reliability, Cape Air was able to receive a TBO extension for their C402 engines. This policy was discussed in an Aviation Consumer article last year. -- Peter |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Peter R. wrote:
: The only fact that sort of sways me into the shock cooling camp is what : Cape Air does with their Cessna 402s. The head of our local flight : school used to fly with Cape Air and told me about their strict policy : of using all drag-inducing devices to descend long before they reduce : power. As a result of demonstrated engine reliability, Cape Air was : able to receive a TBO extension for their C402 engines. I've never seen a Cape Air plane flying above 1500'. Usually Cape Approach, or Hyannis/Martha's Vineyard/Nantucket tower calls 'em as traffic "well below" me. I will ask about their engine management procedures - I know quite a few Cape Air pilots - but I don't remember them doing anything out of the ordinary. -- Aaron C. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter R." wrote in message ... markjenn ) wrote: They're not a bad idea on some aircraft, but Bonanzas, with their 154K gear speeds, really don't need them. In his Avweb articles (posted in this thread), John Deakin expressed the same opinion. The reason I was considering them had to do with the type of airports in which I fly. The majority of my flying is for Angel Flight Northeast, which brings me into Teterboro and Boston Logan frequently. If I could fly at 160-170 all the way to the outer marker, it would certainly make fitting in to the traffic flow much easier. While the Bonanza is a slippery devil, they're not that hard to bleed off speed when you have a few miles from the FAF. But, cost is certainly an issue and if I am lacking in skills to slow the aircraft down, then this is something I should explore. I was going to take a Bonanza Proficiency course last October, but unfortunately a cylinder cracked and started this extended maintenance period. You'll get much more, and enduring, "mileage" from the BPPP (http://www.bppp.org/main.asp) and from the Advanced Pilot Seminars http://www.advancedpilot.com/course.html (I take it you have GAMIjectors in your Bonanza??) Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:22:13 -0500, Peter R.
wrote: But, cost is certainly an issue and if I am lacking in skills to slow the aircraft down, then this is something I should explore. Why not build the skills? It'll probably cost less, you'll be a better pilot overall, and I'll bet you have fun doing it. If your ever deep in failures, the skill will help you more than a gadget ever will, i.e. save you life. ..02 z |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Matt Barrow ) wrote:
You'll get much more, and enduring, "mileage" from the BPPP (http://www.bppp.org/main.asp) and from the Advanced Pilot Seminars http://www.advancedpilot.com/course.html I most definitely plan on taking the BPPP course as soon as the engine is comfortably broken in. (I take it you have GAMIjectors in your Bonanza??) Yes, as well as Tornado Alley's turbo-normalization system. -- Peter |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter R." wrote in message ... Matt Barrow ) wrote: You'll get much more, and enduring, "mileage" from the BPPP (http://www.bppp.org/main.asp) and from the Advanced Pilot Seminars http://www.advancedpilot.com/course.html I most definitely plan on taking the BPPP course as soon as the engine is comfortably broken in. (I take it you have GAMIjectors in your Bonanza??) Yes, as well as Tornado Alley's turbo-normalization system. Then you'll definitely want to take the Advanced Pilot Seminar, so as to keep your new engine in prime shape. Which model Bo do you have? I have a B36TC but swapped the engine at TBO for a Millennium TN IO-550, all done by the Western Skyways http://www.westernskyways.com/turbo_es.html -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Unless there is a very odd reason, the round rubber speed brakes
extendable on the bottom work fine. Why add any weight for this at all? Get to adding stuff, pretty soon they fly like pigs. Keep it light. My opinion. Bill Hale BPPP |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Matt Barrow ) wrote:
Which model Bo do you have? A '73 V35B. I have a B36TC but swapped the engine at TBO for a Millennium TN IO-550, all done by the Western Skyways http://www.westernskyways.com/turbo_es.html Very nice. After some research, I opted to stay with the IO-520 and went with a GAMISpec overhauled engine with Millennium Taperfin cylinders. -- Peter |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:50:22 -0800, "markjenn"
wrote: They're not a bad idea on some aircraft, but Bonanzas, with their 154K gear speeds, really don't need them. I also think that shock-cooling is an overrated thing, but that's another discussion. Some Bonanzas have gear speeds at 100mph |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Opinions on Cessna 340, 414 and 421 | john szpara | Owning | 55 | April 2nd 04 09:08 PM |
Thanks for your opinions - Going to pick up plane tomorrow!! | Larryskydives | Owning | 0 | February 13th 04 04:44 AM |
OPINIONS: THE SOLUTION | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 4 | January 7th 04 10:43 PM |
Rallye/Koliber AD's and opinions | R. Wubben | Owning | 2 | October 16th 03 05:39 AM |
Early Bonanza or Apache? | Brinks | Owning | 11 | July 16th 03 06:01 PM |