If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Chris Nicholas wrote: U Sorry to be ignorant, but I don't understand the technicalities of this. What is the " . . . unfavourable pressure gradient . ." ? One in the wrong direction, or too large, or what? And in what sense does a transition have energy? Particularly "enough energy to keep the bubble small" ? If it had energy, the idiot layman's thinking is that more means bigger. Hoping for education, not flames or sarcasm. Chris N. Chris, I highly recommend you run, don't walk, to the book store and purchase the Illustrated Guide to Aerodynamics by Skip Smith. All of this stuff and a whole lot more is covered in a very easy to read format aimed at the layman. It doesn't dumb things down too much, so you still need to think and maybe even scribble some numbers from time to time. You can find it online at any of the usual places: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...72135?v=glance Happy learning, Erik Mann (P3) |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Some time ago, I saw a table comparing various gliders with clean vs. dirty
(I remember somthing like 20 bugs per meter) wings. In that comparission especially the PIK-20 was very bad with the dirty wing. IMO a wet wing with water drops multiple times as big as bugs the performance is "comparable" to the dirty wing. Much to my surprise (I think) a DG-400 which should have the same profile wasn't that bug-sensitive. Anyone knows the source for that table? Christian "Alan Garside" wrote in message ... Having flown a Pik 20D (same wing section as the B) for 18 years I can confirm this is one Glider you do NOT want to fly in rain. The first indication you get in rain is a vibration through the stick, then any lift you might have been in becomes sink, I have lost thousands of feet trying to cross areas of rain (9000' in Poland). I have had to leave a thermal because a Glider above decided to dump his water. I have found increasing the speed to 65kts while flying out of the rain seems the optimum solution. If you follow the director then you will be on the ground very quickly. A pilot from our club flying a B was caught on the ridge in rain and had to land at the bottom of the ridge but was unable to select a suitable field as he just ran out of height/time. The Pik was way ahead of its time when it first came out but at a price, the wing section, which needs to be kept clean of bugs and out of rain. Dick Jhonson's report suggested if the leading edge was re-profiled so it was not so sharp it could improve this situation. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:55:40 +0000, 01-- Zero One wrote:
I believe all of you about your experiences in the Pik 20. However, my glider, a refinished LS-3a with the FX-67-K-170 airfoil, has little detectable deterioration in the rain. I notice perhaps a very small performance hit but really nothing like what you all have been describing. I suppose that during the refinish job several years ago they hit on the right leading edge profile by chance. Whatever the case, I have been able to do several nice climbs in rain and virga that clearly had the wing well disturbed. I can't talk for the Pik, but I used to own a share in a Nimbus 2 and I currently own a share in an LS3a. Supposedly all of these have rain sensitive airfoils. In over 800 hours in the Nimbus, I never noticed a problem when the wings got wet. However in the LS3a I have had the experience of flying in wave, just in front of a wave cloud. The wave seemed very weak and I could not gain hight but a K7 joined underneath and quietly out climbed me. Then I noticed that water droplets had formed along the leading edge of the LS3a wing. This must have been due to condensation in the wet layer, as the canopy remained dry. There was also a slight vibration which was just detectable in the very smooth wave conditions. I persevered and eventually climbed above the moist layer. As the wings dried the vibration stopped and the rate of climb increased. Then as I gained hight the lift got stronger, I enjoyed that afternoon ;-). Ian |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good | Excelsior | Home Built | 0 | April 22nd 05 01:11 AM |
Fear of Sanding | Stuart Grant | Soaring | 7 | January 17th 05 05:28 PM |
Special Flight Setup Question (COF) | Dudley Henriques | Simulators | 4 | October 11th 03 12:14 AM |