A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

High Altitude operations (Turbo charge???)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old July 10th 03, 02:35 PM
Wooduuuward
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

There used to be an add on kit that fed water vapor into the carb, which
increased performance. They used them on Spitfires during WWll and on
cars in the seventies. H20 = hydrogen and oxygen.

Morgans wrote:

"dann mann" wrote in message
...
How about one of the new miniature turbine engines used on model
aircraft. Duct it so the exhaust would feed directly into the carb of
the main engine on take off and shut the turbine off for cruise. These
cost about 1500 bucks now and weigh about 10 lbs.


Uh, bzzzzt. No. How about the nearly no oxygen content the engine is
feeding the other engine. Besides for 1500 bucks, there are proven methods.
--
Jim in NC

  #52  
Old July 10th 03, 03:17 PM
Bushy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The 115 with 100% is close but how the hell do you get 105% humidity?

"super-saturated solution". Really.


In other words, it's raining. There is more moisture than the 100% that the
air can support and so it falls.

Hope this helps,
Peter


  #53  
Old July 10th 03, 03:20 PM
Tim Ward
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Wooduuuward" wrote in message
...
There used to be an add on kit that fed water vapor into the carb, which
increased performance. They used them on Spitfires during WWll and on
cars in the seventies. H20 = hydrogen and oxygen.


Better yet, feed in wood smoke, and you can spit two-by-fours out the
exhaust.
Water is hydrogen and oxygen that has already been burned.

Water injection is used to prevent preignition, though.

Tim Ward


  #54  
Old July 10th 03, 03:27 PM
Bushy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Water injection has been used for years to allow a motor to run with more
spark advance and or compression and or boost. Without the water, pinking
(or pinging, depends on what school you went to!) will occur earlier and
this limits the power of the engine without it self-destructing.

There are two schools of thought whether the water turning into steam inside
the cylinder is significant, and a search of the net will find several sites
that disagree.

Can be added to a car with a junkies needle (available free at your local
needle exchange) a bit of rubber tubing and a water container. Changing the
gauge of the needle allows different flow rates.

Hope this helps,
Peter

"Wooduuuward" wrote in message
...
There used to be an add on kit that fed water vapor into the carb, which
increased performance. They used them on Spitfires during WWll and on
cars in the seventies. H20 = hydrogen and oxygen.

Morgans wrote:

"dann mann" wrote in message
...
How about one of the new miniature turbine engines used on model
aircraft. Duct it so the exhaust would feed directly into the carb of
the main engine on take off and shut the turbine off for cruise. These
cost about 1500 bucks now and weigh about 10 lbs.


Uh, bzzzzt. No. How about the nearly no oxygen content the engine is
feeding the other engine. Besides for 1500 bucks, there are proven

methods.
--
Jim in NC



  #55  
Old July 10th 03, 03:47 PM
Big John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yep.

When I had my Company in the Oil Patch and was inventing things in the
shop and patenting them.

Big John
BSME


On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 23:45:30 +0100, "Model Flyer"
wrote:


"Big John" wrote in message
.. .
I'd suggest you get one or two of the 4 foot shop fans that sit on

the
floor. When I worked in my shop, they did a pretty good job of

keeping
me comfortable.


You Worked?
--

.


  #56  
Old July 10th 03, 03:59 PM
Big John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Water injection in WWII aircraft engines was basically to prevent
detonation with high MP. Believe the Jug had it on their R-2800 P & W
engines. Could pull 90 inches with water as I recall???

Some early jets had water injection. Ferried a F-94A/B that had water.
Used on T/O and you used all to prevent any residual from freezing in
tamk and lines at altiude (-50 F).

Big John
Point of the sword.

On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 09:35:52 -0400, Wooduuuward
wrote:

There used to be an add on kit that fed water vapor into the carb, which
increased performance. They used them on Spitfires during WWll and on
cars in the seventies. H20 = hydrogen and oxygen.

Morgans wrote:

"dann mann" wrote in message
...
How about one of the new miniature turbine engines used on model
aircraft. Duct it so the exhaust would feed directly into the carb of
the main engine on take off and shut the turbine off for cruise. These
cost about 1500 bucks now and weigh about 10 lbs.


Uh, bzzzzt. No. How about the nearly no oxygen content the engine is
feeding the other engine. Besides for 1500 bucks, there are proven methods.
--
Jim in NC


  #57  
Old July 10th 03, 04:30 PM
RobertR237
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Model Flyer"
writes:


Bob, the simple answer is, the leaf blower is turbo charged.:-)
--

.
--
Cheers,
Jonathan Lowe
modelflyer at antispam dot net


Damn, why didn't I think of that? Now where can I buy one of those turbo
charged leaf blowers? I am tired of climbing on top of my high pitched roof to
blow pine needles and one of those should do the trick in short order.




Bob Reed
www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)
KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress....

"Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice,
pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!"
(M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman)

  #58  
Old July 10th 03, 07:30 PM
bob zee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



"Richard Lamb" wrote in message
...
How about building a 2180.

Personally, I'd not fly a turbocharged VW.

Ever.

Richard


this observation come from personal experience?

--
bob z.

"people with less brain power than you are doing more difficult things
everyday"©


  #59  
Old July 10th 03, 08:35 PM
Bart D. Hull
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


into intellectual contests and/or berating others ideas?

I thought the weed eater / supercharger idea was novel as well as the
water injection idea. Why can't we continue with this brainstorming
without attacking anyone's ideas? How else can "crazy" ideas be explored
for practical application.

I saw a weedeater used as a "pony" motor to start a Lyc or Cont on a
aircraft that didn't have (want) an electrical system.

Sure beat hand propping.

Just my 2 cents. (I'm the "crazy" guy that's going to use a Turbo'd
Subaru in my "Fast Glass" kit. Isn't that what the E in EAA means?)


--
Bart D. Hull

Tempe, Arizona

Check
http://www.inficad.com/~bdhull/engine.html for my Subaru Engine
Conversion
Check http://www.inficad.com/~bdhull/fuselage.html for Tango II I'm
building.



Morgans wrote:
"Wooduuuward" wrote in message
...

There used to be an add on kit that fed water vapor into the carb, which
increased performance. They used them on Spitfires during WWll and on
cars in the seventies. H20 = hydrogen and oxygen.



BZZZZZZT. No.

The water fed into engines is to cool the gas air charge, and keep it from
detonating, with really high levels of boost. Like over 100 inches of
manifold pressure.

This was used on many types of high performance applications today, and on
planes today such as at Reno.


  #60  
Old July 10th 03, 08:46 PM
Dave Hyde
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Big John wrote:

Some early jets had water injection.


Some current jets still do. KC-135 IIRC, and AV-8B.
Little bitta cooling, lotta extra massflow.
Different principle than water injection on
recips, but fun to use all the same. g

Dave 'oomph' Hyde

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.