A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Getting rid of MXSMANIC



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old December 6th 06, 05:11 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jon Kraus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 194
Default Getting rid of MXSMANIC

wouldn't that be 16 kinds of people?

Jon

fromTheShadows wrote:
Kingfish wrote:


110010010010111000100101101100100110 --- I don't care who you are,
that was funny...


There are 10 kinds of people in this world - those who understand
binary, and those who don't.

  #22  
Old December 6th 06, 05:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
fromTheShadows[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12
Default Getting rid of MXSMANIC

Jon Kraus wrote:
wouldn't that be 16 kinds of people?


I said binary, not hex.
  #23  
Old December 6th 06, 05:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Andrew Sarangan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 382
Default Getting rid of MXSMANIC

I agree. It is just another example of the superiority complex some
pilots seem to have. Since mx has only flown in simulators, they are
compelled to make his questions appear stupid. Although most of his
questions have been fairly basic, there were some that many were unable
to answer or gave wong answers to.




Jay Honeck wrote:
I'm sure you're a nice reasonable guy in person. It's just hard to see
that on the net.


Well put, Kev.

I don't understand the venom MX has inspired here, but I *do* regret
it. And, to a certain degree, I fear it, because it shows a side of
airmen that I didn't think existed.

Sure, he can be obnoxious, and he's got some goofy attitudes toward
flying (and life in general, if you ask me) -- but so what? If you
don't like what he's saying, don't read it. If you think his threads
are stupid, start one of your own.

I, for one, find MX to be occasionally enlightening, intensely curious
(in some ways), dunderheaded (in others), and I must admit that it's
kind of entertaining to watch as some of the regulars here do
switchblade backflips as they try to insult him into leaving the group.


And to those who pronounce that they regret MX's presence here because
his topics detract from the true purpose of this group, I challenge you
to bring up some good, useful piloting subjects of your own. Too many
of you guys are hunkered down behind your monitors, rolling
hand-grenades down the aisle instead of trying to positively impact
this group with new topics.

To which I say: Stand up and START A NEW THREAD. Move on from this
guy, gentlemen!

I'll tell you this much -- I admire his persistence. Thin-skinned he
isn't.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #24  
Old December 6th 06, 05:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Neil Gould
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 723
Default Getting rid of MXSMANIC

Hmm, no. Now we know which group *you're* in! ;-)


Recently, Jon Kraus posted:

wouldn't that be 16 kinds of people?

Jon

fromTheShadows wrote:
Kingfish wrote:


110010010010111000100101101100100110 --- I don't care who you
are, that was funny...


There are 10 kinds of people in this world - those who understand
binary, and those who don't.



  #25  
Old December 6th 06, 10:31 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Grumman-581[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 491
Default Getting rid of MXSMANIC

On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 06:13:23 -0800, in
.com, Kingfish wrote:

Nomen Nescio wrote:

I also tend to think that if you're an idiot on usenet, you're probably
an idiot in (so called) "real life". Maybe a more subdued idiot, but still
an idiot. The same thing goes for all other "human" characteristics.


Blame it on the anonymity of the Internet. Without face 2 face
interaction there's a kind of disconnect at work here which creates a
whole different conversational dynamic. Sometimes with incendiary
results.


Of course, you're telling that to someone who uses an anonymous remailer...
  #26  
Old December 6th 06, 10:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bucky
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 27
Default Getting rid of MXSMANIC

Jay Honeck wrote:
If you don't like what he's saying, don't read it.


Exactly. Some accuse him of being a troll, but he's really not--he's
not posting inflammatory, off-topic, or insulting statements.
Ironically, it's his detractors who are posting that type of content.
He's just posting basic and naive questions, which annoys the heck out
of pilots who feel superior. If you don't want to read basic/naive
threads, then just ignore/killfile him and his threads.

I must admit that it's
kind of entertaining to watch as some of the regulars here do
switchblade backflips as they try to insult him into leaving the group.


Yeah, like that has ever worked. I've seen some posters in other groups
drive themselves crazy trying to ostracize someone into leaving the
group. They just ended up quitting the group themselves out of
frustration.

  #27  
Old December 6th 06, 11:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Aluckyguess
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 276
Default Getting rid of MXSMANIC


"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
ups.com...
I'm sure you're a nice reasonable guy in person. It's just hard to see
that on the net.


Well put, Kev.

I don't understand the venom MX has inspired here, but I *do* regret
it. And, to a certain degree, I fear it, because it shows a side of
airmen that I didn't think existed.

Sure, he can be obnoxious, and he's got some goofy attitudes toward
flying (and life in general, if you ask me) -- but so what? If you
don't like what he's saying, don't read it. If you think his threads
are stupid, start one of your own.

I, for one, find MX to be occasionally enlightening, intensely curious
(in some ways), dunderheaded (in others), and I must admit that it's
kind of entertaining to watch as some of the regulars here do
switchblade backflips as they try to insult him into leaving the group.


And to those who pronounce that they regret MX's presence here because
his topics detract from the true purpose of this group, I challenge you
to bring up some good, useful piloting subjects of your own. Too many
of you guys are hunkered down behind your monitors, rolling
hand-grenades down the aisle instead of trying to positively impact
this group with new topics.

To which I say: Stand up and START A NEW THREAD. Move on from this
guy, gentlemen!


Ditto

I'll tell you this much -- I admire his persistence. Thin-skinned he
isn't.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"



  #28  
Old December 6th 06, 11:06 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 790
Default Getting rid of MXSMANIC

"Bucky" wrote in message
oups.com...
Jay Honeck wrote:
If you don't like what he's saying, don't read it.


Exactly. Some accuse him of being a troll, but he's really not--he's
not posting inflammatory, off-topic, or insulting statements.
Ironically, it's his detractors who are posting that type of content.
He's just posting basic and naive questions, which annoys the heck out
of pilots who feel superior. If you don't want to read basic/naive
threads, then just ignore/killfile him and his threads.

I must admit that it's
kind of entertaining to watch as some of the regulars here do
switchblade backflips as they try to insult him into leaving the group.


Yeah, like that has ever worked. I've seen some posters in other groups
drive themselves crazy trying to ostracize someone into leaving the
group. They just ended up quitting the group themselves out of
frustration.


Stick your nose into rec.ponds if you want to see what can happen if a few
people get serious about trying to rid a newsgroup of a few others by the
constant posting of rebuttals and insults. There's nothing left there.

--
Geoff
The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com
remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail
When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate.


  #29  
Old December 6th 06, 11:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Kev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 368
Default Getting rid of MXSMANIC


Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe wrote:

Stick your nose into rec.ponds if you want to see what can happen if a few
people get serious about trying to rid a newsgroup of a few others by the
constant posting of rebuttals and insults. There's nothing left there.


A lot of usenet has become that way. I don't know if it's fallout from
the Endless September ** or what. Some of my techie groups have been
overtaken by "experts" who put down any newcomer who dares ask a
question. Very sad. Seems like a lot of people are stressed and want
someone easy to beat up on. That's why I don't want that to happen
here.

Kev

** http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal_September

  #30  
Old December 7th 06, 08:31 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 478
Default Getting rid of MXSMANIC


"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
ups.com...

I don't understand the venom MX has inspired here, but I *do* regret
it. And, to a certain degree, I fear it, because it shows a side of
airmen that I didn't think existed.


Yeah. Sad, that. It happens in a great deal of internet forums, I guess.

-c



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VFR position reporting Mxsmanic Piloting 154 November 26th 06 04:45 PM
For MXSMANIC: Flight Simulator Gear? Jay Honeck Piloting 20 October 24th 06 11:48 PM
Ping Mxsmanic... Bill Denton Piloting 7 October 2nd 06 03:02 PM
Please Ignore Mxsmanic Terry Piloting 45 September 29th 06 08:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.