A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Electronic Artificial Horizon



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old May 3rd 07, 07:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Ramy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 746
Default Electronic Artificial Horizon

On May 2, 11:03 pm, wrote:
On May 2, 5:52 am, wrote:

for my money, if youve got an experimental glider, go for the Dynon
10A flight display. the power draw is low and you get a lot more info
than just an AI.


The spec at Dynon says 8 watts, which translates to 670 mA, which
doesn't sound low to me, at least for a glider. Or is the actual draw
less than the spec? Admittedly a lot less than a mechanical gyro, but
not something I could run continually for any time. I tried to find
the current draw of the TruTrak units, but couldn't. I think they're
better, but does anyone know for sure?


I don't have the numbers but the TruTrak drain is very low. I am
running my TruTrak from the same 7AH battery as my transponder and it
is good for at least 6 hours. You can also add an on/off switch and
turn it on only when it may be needed, as it starts instantly.

Ramy

  #12  
Old May 3rd 07, 01:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Martin Gregorie[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 276
Default Electronic Artificial Horizon

wrote:
On May 2, 5:52 am, wrote:
for my money, if youve got an experimental glider, go for the Dynon
10A flight display. the power draw is low and you get a lot more info
than just an AI.


The spec at Dynon says 8 watts, which translates to 670 mA, which
doesn't sound low to me, at least for a glider. Or is the actual draw
less than the spec? Admittedly a lot less than a mechanical gyro, but
not something I could run continually for any time. I tried to find
the current draw of the TruTrak units, but couldn't. I think they're
better, but does anyone know for sure?

This probably won't be much help, but.....

There is no manual for the Tru-Trak T&S on their site - at least I
couldn't find one, but I did find one for the ADI, which is somewhat
similar. It didn't quote actual drain, but did say that the wiring and
fuse should handle 2 amps.

OTOH, instruments that I actually have the manual for (SDI C4, Filser
ATR-500) both ask for fuses that are rated well above actual current drain.

Has anybody got experience with the Tru-Trak ADI that they can share?
Would it be any better in a glider than their T&S, bearing in mind that
its twice the price?


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |
  #13  
Old May 3rd 07, 04:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
bumper
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 322
Default Electronic Artificial Horizon

I couldn't find the current draw of the TruTrak on line either, however I
remember when installing it that it draws just under .120 amps (120
milliamps). I have mine switched so it's only on when needed.

bumper
"Ramy" wrote in message
ps.com...
On May 2, 11:03 pm, wrote:
On May 2, 5:52 am, wrote:

for my money, if youve got an experimental glider, go for the Dynon
10A flight display. the power draw is low and you get a lot more info
than just an AI.


The spec at Dynon says 8 watts, which translates to 670 mA, which
doesn't sound low to me, at least for a glider. Or is the actual draw
less than the spec? Admittedly a lot less than a mechanical gyro, but
not something I could run continually for any time. I tried to find
the current draw of the TruTrak units, but couldn't. I think they're
better, but does anyone know for sure?


I don't have the numbers but the TruTrak drain is very low. I am
running my TruTrak from the same 7AH battery as my transponder and it
is good for at least 6 hours. You can also add an on/off switch and
turn it on only when it may be needed, as it starts instantly.

Ramy



  #14  
Old May 3rd 07, 04:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Tuno
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 640
Default Electronic Artificial Horizon

I have no idea if any work has been done in the last year. My last
step was to return the unit to the US dealer, which I was able to do
in person since the shop is a 20 minute drive from where I work, and I
watched him upload the latest and greatest software, but it made no
difference in the end.

  #15  
Old May 3rd 07, 06:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Martin Gregorie[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 276
Default Electronic Artificial Horizon

Tuno wrote:
I have no idea if any work has been done in the last year. My last
step was to return the unit to the US dealer, which I was able to do
in person since the shop is a 20 minute drive from where I work, and I
watched him upload the latest and greatest software, but it made no
difference in the end.

Thanks. Looks like the TruTrak T&S is the way to go. Besides, its a
one-box solution and I could have fun and games working out where to put
the AHRS sensor box in my Libelle.


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
artificial horizon DavidH Home Built 14 March 14th 07 07:47 AM
Artificial horizon pinout? [email protected] Home Built 3 July 16th 06 02:02 PM
Artificial Horizon testing Rory O'Conor Soaring 6 April 5th 05 11:48 PM
New artificial horizon - Sigmatek or R.C. Allen? David Herman Owning 7 November 13th 04 01:38 PM
Artificial Horizon/Autopilot Connection Jay Honeck Owning 2 September 7th 03 05:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.