If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"Michael" wrote I did it because I had a schedule to keep, a plane to move, and the guy who hired me didn't hire me to sit on my ass because the engine might quit. And the engine was in good shape, and the plane had a good annual and several hours after the annual to shake out the bugs, and so I judged the risk to be fairly low. In a typical rental, I might not have done it - and I sure wouldn't do it all the time. The odds will catch up with you eventually. Michael WoW. Good reasons? Hmmm. Personal standards? Hmmm. And admitting it will catch up, signifying you realize that this will kill you? Hmmm. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Morgans wrote:
WoW. Good reasons? Hmmm. Personal standards? Hmmm. And admitting it will catch up, signifying you realize that this will kill you? Hmmm. I'm a commercial pilot. When I am hired to move an airplane, I am hired to do a job. That job includes risk. When I took my first job out of school, troubleshooting distillation towers, I took a lot more risk. When you use the airplane as a tool (meaning a vehicle for getting you where you want to go when you want to get there, and not just a way of going up to see the pretty scenery, shoot some landings, and get a hundred dollar burger or attend a fly-in) there is unavoidably going to be some risk. If you don't, you could in theory get the risk down to almost nothing. But only in theory. In reality, the most dangerous segment of aviation isn't the people who fly with a schedule to keep and a place to be. These people (the self-flown business flyers and the commercial pilots) have a safety record dramatically better than GA as a whole - in part, I think, because they're not kidding themselves about the risks. Who are the most dangerous people in GA? Well, it's not the the personal flyers, who just go for hundred dollar burgers, attend flyins, and look at the pretty scenery. They're number two - behind the airshow performers, and slightly ahead of the cropdusters. Don't believe me? Check out the Nall Report. It's on the AOPA site. Michael |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I think it was Chuck Yeager who said it was the third problem that
killed you. We can deal with two problems at once but we can't deal with three. So my rule is to never fly with more than one known problem because unforeseen problems have a way of appearing when they aren't convenient. As for flying at night over the mountains that is definitely a problem. The plane and engine have to be in perfect condition. The weather has to be perfect and I have to be current, rested and alert. If those conditions are met then I wouldn't have a problem flying a Cessna 152 at night over the mountains and I have done it a few times. I personally think that weather in the mountains is a much more severe problem than darkness. LG |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Legrande Harris" wrote The plane and engine have to be in perfect condition. Perfect engines fail, too. Right? -- Jim in NC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Morgans wrote: Perfect engines fail, too. Right? Yep. One that quit on takeoff at Kupper was a Mattituck overhaul with only a few hours on it. That's about as perfect as you're gonna get in this world. The CFI did a fantastic job of returning to the airport from about 600' AGL, refused the offer of a drink, and went home (presumably to change). George Patterson I prefer Heaven for climate but Hell for company. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Morgans" wrote: "Legrande Harris" wrote The plane and engine have to be in perfect condition. Perfect engines fail, too. Right? Everything mechanical will break. Do I want to be flying at night over the mountains when my engine dies? The thought of spiraling down into a black hole doesn't really appeal to me I actually enjoy flying at night though. I learned to fly down in Arizona and flying at night with a full moon across the desert was a wonderful experience. At night I would have less turbulence, the aircrafts performance was better and most of the time I could see the ground well enough to probably survive an engine out landing. So is it worth the risk? Is it worth the risk not to? LG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 106 | May 12th 04 07:18 AM |
Night Flying Tips | BoDEAN | Piloting | 7 | May 4th 04 03:22 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Products | 1 | November 4th 03 12:57 AM |
Headlight for night flying | Paul Tomblin | Piloting | 22 | September 27th 03 09:32 AM |