If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#231
|
|||
|
|||
"None" wrote in message ink.net... "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message ink.net... Good lawdy, you can easily tell you're a republican. An excuse for everything, and someone else to blame! You've noticed! And not just once in a while, but always. (^-^))) George Z. |
#232
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message ink.net... "None" wrote in message ink.net... Good lawdy, you can easily tell you're a republican. It appears you can't, as I am not now and have never been a Republican. But you quack like one......what else could you be? (^-^))) |
#233
|
|||
|
|||
"George Z. Bush" wrote in message ... But you quack like one......what else could you be? (^-^))) I'm a classic liberal. |
#234
|
|||
|
|||
"George Z. Bush" wrote in message ... Anyway, if you proved your point, why don't you just move on instead on mince-meating the subject? Devil asked a follow-up question. Take it up with him. If you're satisfied that you've got it right, why is it so important to you to make the other guy out to be wrong? I should ignore follow-up questions asked of me? Why? Isn't being right in your own mind good enough for you? I feel the need to help my fellow man understand. Maybe you're not that sure of yourself. Is that it? Nope. |
#235
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message ink.net... "George Z. Bush" wrote in message ... But you quack like one......what else could you be? (^-^))) I'm a classic liberal. God forbid!!! |
#236
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message ink.net... "Jenn" wrote in message ... and in spite of Bush's recent lies on the subject -- inspectors were in Iraq helping to enforce that policy when the US decided a war would be more fun and more politically expedient What are Bush's recent lies on the subject? How about today's goody: We weren't threatened by Sadaam's WMDs, it was his plans to have them that drove us to war. Being threatened by weapons that didn't exist was at least credible, but being threatened by plans to get those weapons? When will you give up and stop swallowing every bit of pap they put in your mouth? It's not unpatriotic to question him.....it's unpatriotic not to question him when he has so much trouble coming up with a believable answer. And we're not talking about a blow job now; this is a lot more important!!! |
#237
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message .net... "George Z. Bush" wrote in message ... Anyway, if you proved your point, why don't you just move on instead on mince-meating the subject? Devil asked a follow-up question. Take it up with him. I must have missed it, so I'm taking it up with you. Any good reason for the Texas two step? If you're satisfied that you've got it right, why is it so important to you to make the other guy out to be wrong? I should ignore follow-up questions asked of me? Why? Why not? Isn't being right in your own mind good enough for you? I feel the need to help my fellow man understand. All together now and not too loud: bulllllllllllshiiiiiiiiit!! Maybe you're not that sure of yourself. Is that it? Nope. Then what is it? |
#238
|
|||
|
|||
"George Z. Bush" wrote in message ... When will you give up and stop swallowing every bit of pap they put in your mouth? I'm by nature quite skeptical, especially when it comes to government. The fact remains nobody has demonstrated any Bush statement to be a lie. |
#239
|
|||
|
|||
"George Z. Bush" wrote in message ... I must have missed it, so I'm taking it up with you. Review the thread, and I can't speak for him. Any good reason for the Texas two step? Texas two step? Why not? Because I choose to answer them. Then what is it? It's be impolite not to answer. Why is this so important to you? What is it to you if I answer a question asked of me directly? |
#240
|
|||
|
|||
"George Z. Bush" wrote in message ... That makes me feel a lot better. Our decisions are being made by the whole world. At least we have a consensus, right? But, if that was the case, why didn't the UN go along with our little adventure? As I recall, they kind of hinted that they weren't finished looking. Yup, the UN was content to look forever. As I recall, the time limit Saddam agreed to in 1991 was something like 90 days. He had over twelve years. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
State Of Michigan Sales/Use Tax | Rich S. | Home Built | 0 | August 9th 04 04:41 PM |
Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements | me | Military Aviation | 146 | January 15th 04 10:13 PM |
Soviet State Committee on Science and Technology | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 0 | November 8th 03 10:45 PM |
Homebuilts by State | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 14 | October 15th 03 08:30 PM |
Police State | Grantland | Military Aviation | 0 | September 15th 03 12:53 PM |