If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#171
|
|||
|
|||
visualisation of the lift distribution over a wing
Alan Baker wrote:
"Those weren't my words." You didn't have enough confidence in Mr. Bachelors and Masters from MIT, Ph.D. from Stanford's words to defend them. They don't need defense. But you weren't sure yesterday, so you needed it? I found your airplane! It's all about downwash. http://www.amvaircraft.com/html/gallery_2.html |
#172
|
|||
|
|||
visualisation of the lift distribution over a wing
Alan Baker wrote:
Beryl wrote: ... Right. And I can push against the hill across the road with my voice. Not much, but enough to move the diaphragm in a microphone over there, in a split second. The air expelled from lungs is never going to make it across the road. No, sorry. You don't push the hill with your voice. Of course I do. The pressure waves contain both positive and negative phases. So you think that a positive won't push because a negative will be coming along shortly? I think their will be no net push, yes. See the difference: sound waves, no net flow: no net push. Sound waves, no net flow: more push than I can apply to the hill across the road. http://www.tech-faq.com/acoustic-levitation.shtml http://science.howstuffworks.com/aco...evitation2.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acoustic_levitation |
#173
|
|||
|
|||
visualisation of the lift distribution over a wing
In article ,
Beryl wrote: Alan Baker wrote: And your comparing an Airframe & Power instructor to a Ph.D. in Aeronautics... LOL I didn't compare him to anyone. Yes, you did. You suggest that since an A&P instructor could have some misconceptions about physics that a Ph.D. in Aeronautics would as well. BTW, there is nothing exceptional about the answers to questions that aren't even in his field being wrong. Most weren't answers, nobody asked. LOL That's the title bestowed upon those at the top. Master Instructors receive the highest pay, and are qualified to teach any and all of the classes. He came from the U.S. Navy, where he was a maintenance instructor. Great. That doesn't mean he knows anything about physics and fluid dynamics. Being a Ph.D. in Aeronautics, OTOH... I didn't say he knew much about physics. He was assumed to, required to, but didn't. And this affects the credibility of an actual Ph.D. in the field, how? -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg |
#174
|
|||
|
|||
visualisation of the lift distribution over a wing
Alan Baker wrote:
In article , Beryl wrote: Alan Baker wrote: And your comparing an Airframe & Power instructor to a Ph.D. in Aeronautics... LOL I didn't compare him to anyone. Yes, you did. You suggest that since an A&P instructor could Would. have some misconceptions about physics that a Ph.D. in Aeronautics would as well. Could as well. You made "could" and "would" switch positions. Not by accident. You're simply dishonest. |
#175
|
|||
|
|||
visualisation of the lift distribution over a wing
In article ,
Beryl wrote: Alan Baker wrote: In article , Beryl wrote: Alan Baker wrote: And your comparing an Airframe & Power instructor to a Ph.D. in Aeronautics... LOL I didn't compare him to anyone. Yes, you did. You suggest that since an A&P instructor could Would. have some misconceptions about physics that a Ph.D. in Aeronautics would as well. Could as well. You made "could" and "would" switch positions. Not by accident. You're simply dishonest. LOL -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg |
#176
|
|||
|
|||
visualisation of the lift distribution over a wing
Alan Baker wrote:
In article , Beryl wrote: Alan Baker wrote: In article , Beryl wrote: Alan Baker wrote: And your comparing an Airframe & Power instructor to a Ph.D. in Aeronautics... LOL I didn't compare him to anyone. Yes, you did. You suggest that since an A&P instructor could Would. have some misconceptions about physics that a Ph.D. in Aeronautics would as well. Could as well. You made "could" and "would" switch positions. Not by accident. You're simply dishonest. LOL Step-by-step now, just for Alan. A = An A&P guy is a dummy B = A PhD guy could be a dummy as well A and B That's it, my statement. if A then B A, therefore B That's your understanding of it. |
#177
|
|||
|
|||
visualisation of the lift distribution over a wing
Beryl wrote:
Alan Baker wrote: In article , Beryl wrote: Alan Baker wrote: In article , Beryl wrote: Alan Baker wrote: And your comparing an Airframe & Power instructor to a Ph.D. in Aeronautics... LOL I didn't compare him to anyone. Yes, you did. You suggest that since an A&P instructor could Would. have some misconceptions about physics that a Ph.D. in Aeronautics would as well. Could as well. You made "could" and "would" switch positions. Not by accident. You're simply dishonest. LOL Step-by-step now, just for Alan. No, it's worse than I thought. A = An A&P guy is a dummy B = A PhD guy could be a dummy as well C = An A&P guy could be a dummy D = A PhD guy is a dummy A and B That's it, my statement. if C then D C therefore D That's your understanding of it. |
#178
|
|||
|
|||
visualisation of the lift distribution over a wing
In article ,
Beryl wrote: Alan Baker wrote: In article , Beryl wrote: Alan Baker wrote: In article , Beryl wrote: Alan Baker wrote: And your comparing an Airframe & Power instructor to a Ph.D. in Aeronautics... LOL I didn't compare him to anyone. Yes, you did. You suggest that since an A&P instructor could Would. have some misconceptions about physics that a Ph.D. in Aeronautics would as well. Could as well. You made "could" and "would" switch positions. Not by accident. You're simply dishonest. LOL Step-by-step now, just for Alan. A = An A&P guy is a dummy An A&P is uninformed in an area outside is area of training and expertise. B = A PhD guy could be a dummy as well But you think that a Ph.D. in aeronautics doesn't understand... ....aeronautics. A and B That's it, my statement. if A then B A, therefore B That's your understanding of it. Nope. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg |
#179
|
|||
|
|||
visualisation of the lift distribution over a wing
In article ,
Beryl wrote: Beryl wrote: Alan Baker wrote: In article , Beryl wrote: Alan Baker wrote: In article , Beryl wrote: Alan Baker wrote: And your comparing an Airframe & Power instructor to a Ph.D. in Aeronautics... LOL I didn't compare him to anyone. Yes, you did. You suggest that since an A&P instructor could Would. have some misconceptions about physics that a Ph.D. in Aeronautics would as well. Could as well. You made "could" and "would" switch positions. Not by accident. You're simply dishonest. LOL Step-by-step now, just for Alan. No, it's worse than I thought. A = An A&P guy is a dummy B = A PhD guy could be a dummy as well C = An A&P guy could be a dummy D = A PhD guy is a dummy A and B That's it, my statement. if C then D C therefore D That's your understanding of it. LOL -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg |
#180
|
|||
|
|||
visualisation of the lift distribution over a wing
In article ,
Beryl wrote: Alan Baker wrote: An A&P is uninformed in an area outside is area of training and expertise. The examples (other than chloroform in grass) were well inside his area of training. He holds an A&P Certificate. It's FAA test material. The stuff he goofs up on is the stuff that he's teaching A&P students. You want your airplane repaired by someone who narrowly squeaked by his exams with a 70% score? You really are a ninny aren't you? Learning about chloroform as it pertains to aircraft doesn't teach you a thing about plants and what they actually contain. And the Navy didn't do any better with him. So, just like A&P Master Instructors, and their students, and their students on down the line, the Ph.D.s among us may be every bit as good as those they learned from. This is about you suggesting that because you once knew an A&P instructor who spouted off a lot of foolishness outside his areas of training and expertise, that therefore a Ph.D. in aeronautics won't (alright "might not") understand aeronautics. And it's laughable. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pressure Distribution Charts | sisu1a | Soaring | 0 | September 21st 08 05:53 PM |
Soundwaves Boost Wing Lift | [email protected] | Home Built | 30 | September 5th 05 10:21 PM |
747 weight distribution | Robin | General Aviation | 25 | June 22nd 05 03:53 AM |
Distribution of armor on a B-52 | B2431 | Military Aviation | 12 | August 16th 04 09:07 PM |
Alternator load distribution in a Baron | Viperdoc | Owning | 7 | December 9th 03 10:27 PM |