If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Do not answer Mxsmanic
"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote in message ... "randall g" wrote in message ... On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:52:54 -0400, Jay Somerset wrote: I tend to agree, and might remind folks that the name of this NG is rec.aviation.PILOTING, not rec.aviation.SIMULATORS or rec.aviation.GAMES. So what? He's asking real live pilots stuff about real live piloting. And then he spends the next 20 posts in the thread arguing with them that their answers are wrong. Something akin to high schoolers arguing economics with Dr. Thomas Sowell: www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell081798.html |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Do not answer Mxsmanic
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:15:45 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder"
wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote: "randall g" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:52:54 -0400, Jay Somerset wrote: I tend to agree, and might remind folks that the name of this NG is rec.aviation.PILOTING, not rec.aviation.SIMULATORS or rec.aviation.GAMES. So what? He's asking real live pilots stuff about real live piloting. And then he spends the next 20 posts in the thread arguing with them that their answers are wrong. So what? It still relates to piloting does it not? Nobody is forcing you to participate in or read those threads. randall g =%^) PPASEL+Night 1974 Cardinal RG http://www.telemark.net/randallg Lots of aerial photographs of British Columbia at: http://www.telemark.net/randallg/photos.htm Vancouver's famous Kat Kam: http://www.katkam.ca |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Do not answer Mxsmanic
randall g wrote:
So what? It still relates to piloting does it not? Nobody is forcing you to participate in or read those threads. It diverts energy from the newsgroup. If you have limited time to read and post and you **** away two thirds of it reading his lectures and the resulting answers, then you have very little time left for legitimate posts. He's not interested in your answers to his questions. He's interested in demonstrating his superiority to you in aviation matters. The fact that he's never flown matters not. The fact that you may be infinitely more experienced does not qualify you to answer his questions in his mind. If it did, how could his aviation knowledge be superior to yours? He claims he's been flying sims for 15 years, then he asks if a rudder is required for coordinated flight? Is that a legitimate question for a 15 year "pilot"? People try to straighten him out but it would take more time than I still have on this earth. So many misconceptions, so little willingness to learn. He's a troll; nothing more. I should killfile him but I keep finding myself drawn to his posts like a moth to a flame... I'm never disappointed as he seldom says anything cogent to real pilots. But he says what he says with such conviction! Some newbie is going to read one of his pronouncements, believe it, and it's going to get him killed. Numbnuts will just tsk, tsk the death as the inevitable proof of his assertion that aviation is unsafe. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Do not answer Mxsmanic
I would disagree . I have read with some entertainment the recent 200+
message thread about multiengine airplanes and have been impressed that he has been putting forth arguments that were made by my flight instructors and best pilot friends. And he has been doing it without any resort to ad hominem constructs. There have been two categories of responses to him. In my opinion, those that try to emphasize their points with name calling only reflect badly on themselves. Mortimer Schnerd, RN wrote: randall g wrote: So what? It still relates to piloting does it not? Nobody is forcing you to participate in or read those threads. It diverts energy from the newsgroup. If you have limited time to read and post and you **** away two thirds of it reading his lectures and the resulting answers, then you have very little time left for legitimate posts. He's not interested in your answers to his questions. He's interested in demonstrating his superiority to you in aviation matters. The fact that he's never flown matters not. The fact that you may be infinitely more experienced does not qualify you to answer his questions in his mind. If it did, how could his aviation knowledge be superior to yours? He claims he's been flying sims for 15 years, then he asks if a rudder is required for coordinated flight? Is that a legitimate question for a 15 year "pilot"? People try to straighten him out but it would take more time than I still have on this earth. So many misconceptions, so little willingness to learn. He's a troll; nothing more. I should killfile him but I keep finding myself drawn to his posts like a moth to a flame... I'm never disappointed as he seldom says anything cogent to real pilots. But he says what he says with such conviction! Some newbie is going to read one of his pronouncements, believe it, and it's going to get him killed. Numbnuts will just tsk, tsk the death as the inevitable proof of his assertion that aviation is unsafe. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Do not answer Mxsmanic
swag wrote:
I would disagree . I have read with some entertainment the recent 200+ message thread about multiengine airplanes and have been impressed that he has been putting forth arguments that were made by my flight instructors and best pilot friends. And he has been doing it without any resort to ad hominem constructs. There have been two categories of responses to him. In my opinion, those that try to emphasize their points with name calling only reflect badly on themselves. Um, he's saying that multiengine rated pilots who don't own twins don't know what they are talking about. How is that a rational argument? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Do not answer Mxsmanic
In article ,
randall g wrote: And then he spends the next 20 posts in the thread arguing with them that their answers are wrong. So what? His actions are typical of trolls that are out to pollute a newsgroup to the point of making is useless. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Do not answer Mxsmanic
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:50:58 -0400, Bob Noel
wrote: In article , randall g wrote: And then he spends the next 20 posts in the thread arguing with them that their answers are wrong. So what? His actions are typical of trolls that are out to pollute a newsgroup to the point of making is useless. That is nowhere near happening here. randall g =%^) PPASEL+Night 1974 Cardinal RG http://www.telemark.net/randallg Lots of aerial photographs of British Columbia at: http://www.telemark.net/randallg/photos.htm Vancouver's famous Kat Kam: http://www.katkam.ca |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Do not answer Mxsmanic
His actions are typical of trolls that are out to pollute a newsgroup to the point of making is useless. That is nowhere near happening here. How do you know how many have stopped checking in here, because they do not want to wade through the high number of irrelevant and unnecessary posts? Almost every thread gets invaded, whether he started it or not. I know I am getting close to quiting reading this group for a while, and I have been reading it for a very long time. I simply don't have enough time for the nonsense. I think you are underestimating the power of the troll. -- Jim in NC |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Do not answer Mxsmanic
Mortimer Schnerd, RN wrote: It diverts energy from the newsgroup. If you have limited time to read and post and you **** away two thirds of it reading his lectures and the resulting answers, then you have very little time left for legitimate posts. Are you really that dumb? No matter what I or anybody else posts you just have to read it? Are you kidding me? I bet I don't read 60-70% of what's posted here. It just doesn't interest me. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Do not answer Mxsmanic
OK Emily--you made me go back and reread every single one of his posts
to the group to see if he ever said any such thing and the answer is that he did not. You may have interpolated that if one of his statements or questions called into question a statement by a multiengine rated pilot he was saying such a thing. But my reading of every one of his posts was that he never called anyone a name and he never said "you don't know what you're talking about." Several of his questions which seemed legit , like--"why is a turboprop more expensive than a piston, since it has fewer moving parts, is more reliable, and uses cheaper fuel?" were treated with disdain. One respondent said "You can look it up on google, so quit wasting our time." People are reacting to him with negativity that seems from this casual (and multiengine owner and rated) observer's perspective to be unearned and (since everyone seems to cite their negativity as emanating from the fact that as owners and pilots they must know more than him) quite bigoted. Emily wrote: swag wrote: I would disagree . I have read with some entertainment the recent 200+ message thread about multiengine airplanes and have been impressed that he has been putting forth arguments that were made by my flight instructors and best pilot friends. And he has been doing it without any resort to ad hominem constructs. There have been two categories of responses to him. In my opinion, those that try to emphasize their points with name calling only reflect badly on themselves. Um, he's saying that multiengine rated pilots who don't own twins don't know what they are talking about. How is that a rational argument? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Please Ignore Mxsmanic | Terry | Piloting | 45 | September 29th 06 08:26 PM |
molding plexiglas websites? | [email protected] | Owning | 44 | February 17th 05 09:33 PM |
Answer on CEF ILS RWY 23 questions | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | October 17th 04 04:18 PM |
Dennis Fetters Mini 500 | EmailMe | Home Built | 70 | June 21st 04 09:36 PM |