If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Ok.. you win.. because ANY speed can be "dangerously close" to stall
speed depending on your angle of attack. Of course... stalls in and of themselves are not dangerous.. its the unrecognized ones in uncoordinated flight close to the ground that seem to present the most problems.. ArtP wrote: On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 03:49:19 GMT, "Maule Driver" wrote: Agreed. Wings stall at a given AOA, not at a speed. Which makes the original statement that Va is dangerously close to stall speed inaccurate. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Ok... all you closet aeronautical engineers... I'm asking for someone to
help do my work for me.. with regards to Va.. I have an Excel Spreadsheet application that does W&B and plots it on a graph... The form also lists certain speeds that are "static": Vx/Vy, Vne, etc.. I would like to modify this form to list Va dependent on the given calculated gross weight, and perhaps even doctor it up to do density altitude computations.. If anyone HAS or KNOWS (or has the formulas)how to do this in Excel, please feel free to pass it on.. I'm sure I will figure out or find what I need sooner or later, but I'm not wanting to reinvent the wheel if I dont have to.. this is for myself and some flying club members (and for anyone else who happens to see it on here).. not a school project or work assignment of any kind. Dave PP-ASEL Doug wrote: Kershner's "The Advanced Pilot's Flight Manual" has the following definition for Va. Va - The maneuvering speed. This is the maxiumu speed at a particular weight at which the controls may be fully deflected without overstressing the airplane. Now, Va is commonly taught as turbulent air penetration speed. But nowhere in the definition does it say that Va will protect the airframe from damage due to turbulence. Does slowing down even slower than Va protect the airframe from even more severe turbulence? Or is Va the best speed for turbulence penetration? Or is Va just used as a turbulence air penetration speed becauase of tradition or some other non-technically correct reason. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Dave S wrote:
I have an Excel Spreadsheet application that does W&B and plots it on a graph... The form also lists certain speeds that are "static": Vx/Vy, Vne, etc.. I would like to modify this form to list Va dependent on the given calculated gross weight Easy. Va as published is for max gross weight, and goes down with the square root of weight. So: MGW = Max Gross Weight W = Weight of the aircraft at a given moment Va = Maneuvering speed as published in the POH Va,w = Maneuvering speed for a given weight Va,w = Va * sqrt (W / MGW) Stall speeds (Vs0 and Vs1) both follow the same formula, and so does your final approach speed, which is usually calculated as 1.3 * Vs0. So, if you really want to do landings right, you should calculate your weight at the end of the flight (taking into account fuel burn), calculate a Vs0 based on that, and multiply by 1.3 to get your proper final approach speed (keeping in mind that the multiplication needs to be done in CAS, not IAS). It turns out that for the majority of light airplanes, the difference between max gross and a reasonable minimum landing weight (pilot and minimum fuel) is a small enough percentage of max gross that stall speed only varies a few knots between the upper and lower limits. As a result, most people don't bother with this (nor is it often taught in a private pilot course), and they never have a problem. On a bigger plane where half the takeoff weight can be fuel, it's a much more significant issue and these calculations are done for every takeoff and landing. If you were really paranoid, you could calculate Vfinal and Va for three loadings: pilot and minimum fuel, max gross, and halfway in between, then keep these on your cheat sheet. In flight, just take a WAG which of those you are closest to and use the appropriate number. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks Roy...
And it didnt take me long to find more than I ever wanted to know about this, too.. Stuff that brought me back flashbacks of my physics and calculus classes.. Your formula breaks it down a little more simply than what I did stumble across.. http://142.26.194.131/ and http://142.26.194.131/aerodynamics1/Lift/index.htm I will be puttering around with this and will see what I can come up with, and if its useful. Now... a question about realities.. The POH nazi's will say that the Word as written is good, praise be to the POH... if I base flight decisions and speeds on MY calculated numbers rather than the max weight sea level standard day numbers published in the almighty POH.. am I going to be asking for trouble here? This originally was to come up with weight specific Va for the crib sheet.. but I see (or was reminded of the basics) that Vs is weight dependent too... even if the difference is negligible in the small spam cans with only 300 pounds of fuel. Dave Roy Smith wrote: Dave S wrote: I have an Excel Spreadsheet application that does W&B and plots it on a graph... The form also lists certain speeds that are "static": Vx/Vy, Vne, etc.. I would like to modify this form to list Va dependent on the given calculated gross weight Easy. Va as published is for max gross weight, and goes down with the square root of weight. So: MGW = Max Gross Weight W = Weight of the aircraft at a given moment Va = Maneuvering speed as published in the POH Va,w = Maneuvering speed for a given weight Va,w = Va * sqrt (W / MGW) Stall speeds (Vs0 and Vs1) both follow the same formula, and so does your final approach speed, which is usually calculated as 1.3 * Vs0. So, if you really want to do landings right, you should calculate your weight at the end of the flight (taking into account fuel burn), calculate a Vs0 based on that, and multiply by 1.3 to get your proper final approach speed (keeping in mind that the multiplication needs to be done in CAS, not IAS). It turns out that for the majority of light airplanes, the difference between max gross and a reasonable minimum landing weight (pilot and minimum fuel) is a small enough percentage of max gross that stall speed only varies a few knots between the upper and lower limits. As a result, most people don't bother with this (nor is it often taught in a private pilot course), and they never have a problem. On a bigger plane where half the takeoff weight can be fuel, it's a much more significant issue and these calculations are done for every takeoff and landing. If you were really paranoid, you could calculate Vfinal and Va for three loadings: pilot and minimum fuel, max gross, and halfway in between, then keep these on your cheat sheet. In flight, just take a WAG which of those you are closest to and use the appropriate number. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave S" wrote in message
. net... Ok... all you closet aeronautical engineers... I'm asking for someone to help do my work for me.. with regards to Va.. I have an Excel Spreadsheet application that does W&B and plots it on a graph... The form also lists certain speeds that are "static": Vx/Vy, Vne, etc.. I would like to modify this form to list Va dependent on the given calculated gross weight, and perhaps even doctor it up to do density altitude computations.. Va is proportionate to the square root of the plane's gross weight. Vx, Vy, Vl/d, Vs, and Vs1 are also proportionate to the square root of the gross weight. A handy approximation is that for small percentages below maximum gross weight (say, up to 30% or so), the weight-dependent speeds diminish by half the percentage that the weight diminishes. So, for example, if you're 20% below max gross weight, reduce the appropriate speeds by 10%. (The calculations should be made with regard to CAS rather than IAS, but the difference is usually small.) You can find a good explanation of these speeds' weight-dependency at http://www.av8n.com/how/. --Gary |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
"Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message
news In article , (Doug) wrote: Kershner's "The Advanced Pilot's Flight Manual" has the following definition for Va. Va - The maneuvering speed. This is the maxiumu speed at a particular weight at which the controls may be fully deflected without overstressing the airplane. Va is the MAXIMUM speed (at max gross weight) at which the aircraft can be stalled without exceeding its max designed load factor. The lower the gross weight, the lower the effective Va (due to engine mounts, etc.) This is incorrect. In fact, *both* definitions are incorrect (with all due respect to Kershner). For planes certified under Pt 23, flying at Va *does not* guarantee that you'll stall before exceeding max design load factor, nor that you'll not overstress the airplane. I know this will be controversial & generate a lot of heat, but check out the thread "Overweight takeoff / flight" from last November in rec.aviation.piloting. I used to believe this about Va too, but it is wrong. -- Dr. Tony Cox Citrus Controls Inc. e-mail: http://CitrusControls.com/ |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave S" wrote in message
. net... Now... a question about realities.. The POH nazi's will say that the Word as written is good, praise be to the POH... if I base flight decisions and speeds on MY calculated numbers rather than the max weight sea level standard day numbers published in the almighty POH.. am I going to be asking for trouble here? It depends on what you mean by 'trouble'. The laws of physics prevail over the POH in determining whether your engine mount will break, whether your climb angle will clear an obstacle, whether you can stop before the end of the runway, whether you can glide to a landing spot, etc. And those things are what the V speeds are all about. In fact, though, I don't think there's any contradiction between the physics and the way the POH speeds are supposed to be interpreted. But the question is a good illustration of why understanding the basic physics helps understand how to use the POH numbers safely. --Gary |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
"Doug" wrote in message
om... Orval Fairbairn wrote in message .. . Va is the MAXIMUM speed (at max gross weight) at which the aircraft can be stalled without exceeding its max designed load factor. The lower the gross weight, the lower the effective Va (due to engine mounts, etc.) Where does the above definition come from? You'll not find it anywhere, because it is incorrect. You'll find Va covered in the FAR's for part 23 certified aircraft he- http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/c...4cfr23_00.html The relevant sections are 23.335 (where you see that Va can be *no less than* Vs*sqrt (load factor) -- which means that _it can be greater than this_, and 23.423 where its relationship to control surfaces is discussed. Short answer: Va is defined in terms of what the *control surfaces* can handle, not what the plane can handle. However, Va must be sufficiently high to satisfy 23.335, which means (oddly) that there is no regulatory requirement that stops you from flying at Va without exceeding the load factor. Well fancy that!. -- Dr. Tony Cox Citrus Controls Inc. e-mail: http://CitrusControls.com/ |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Gary... I was looking for actual formalas.. not wild ass guesses or
rough approximations.. Computer spreadsheets use mathematical equations. This is something that may be used by others besides myself. I understand the concepts.. I DIDNT have the actual calcs on hand when I posted my request. Gary Drescher wrote: "Dave S" wrote in message . net... Ok... all you closet aeronautical engineers... I'm asking for someone to help do my work for me.. with regards to Va.. I have an Excel Spreadsheet application that does W&B and plots it on a graph... The form also lists certain speeds that are "static": Vx/Vy, Vne, etc.. I would like to modify this form to list Va dependent on the given calculated gross weight, and perhaps even doctor it up to do density altitude computations.. Va is proportionate to the square root of the plane's gross weight. Vx, Vy, Vl/d, Vs, and Vs1 are also proportionate to the square root of the gross weight. A handy approximation is that for small percentages below maximum gross weight (say, up to 30% or so), the weight-dependent speeds diminish by half the percentage that the weight diminishes. So, for example, if you're 20% below max gross weight, reduce the appropriate speeds by 10%. (The calculations should be made with regard to CAS rather than IAS, but the difference is usually small.) You can find a good explanation of these speeds' weight-dependency at http://www.av8n.com/how/. --Gary |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
"ArtP" Agreed. Wings stall at a given AOA, not at a speed. Which makes the original statement that Va is dangerously close to stall speed inaccurate. Yessssss. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Druine Turbulent | Stealth Pilot | Home Built | 0 | August 30th 04 05:05 PM |
Va and turbulent air penetration speed. | Doug | Instrument Flight Rules | 70 | January 11th 04 08:35 PM |