If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
new world-record for Steve Fossett (USA) and Terry Delore
On Jul 18, 1:04 pm, Cliff Hilty
wrote: There were some issues with the data integrety. I hope that they were able to sort them out. Both pilots were estatic after landing and had quite a tale of long blue holes for completion. OLC or not quite a feat for the day! Hm, I guess Cliff was having the same posting troubles I was.... Google Groups was a bit recalcitrant the last couple days. And a belated congratulations to the pilots - an excellent flight even if the logs don't get sorted out! -Tom |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
new world-record for Steve Fossett (USA) and Terry Delore
There were some issues with the data integrety. I hope that they were able to sort them out. Both pilots were estatic after landing and had quite a tale of long blue holes for completion. OLC or not quite a feat for the day! Too bad they didn't post to the OLC... IMHO, that should be a requirement for all record and perhaps even badge claims. Tom, IMHO, I can't see making OLC posting a requirement, but it would be a great show of Sportsmanship if these kinds of flights were posted, but the next glitch comes with the Tuesday deadline for posting. I personnaly don't know why such a short time after the weekend is needed, I'd prefer a 10 day window, and for non-scoring flights a 30 day window. Can someone pass this on to the OLC admins? While we're at it, I'd like to suggest tothe OLC committee that they settle on one format, and leave it that way for a very long period. In the last 4 years I've known of OLC they've changed the format, look & feel about 3 times, the last being the worst is terms of user friendlyness. Wayne |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
OLC and badge / record claims
On Jul 20, 4:55 am, FreeFlight107 wrote:
There were some issues with the data integrety. I hope that they were able to sort them out. Both pilots were estatic after landing and had quite a tale of long blue holes for completion. OLC or not quite a feat for the day! Too bad they didn't post to the OLC... IMHO, that should be a requirement for all record and perhaps even badge claims. Tom, IMHO, I can't see making OLC posting a requirement, but it would be a great show of Sportsmanship if these kinds of flights were posted First would be sportsmanship, but eventually it could develop into a single international standard for managing all flight claims. It would take a lot of work, but in the end would give all countries and regions the same set of tools to manage their badge and record claims. the next glitch comes with the Tuesday deadline for posting. I personnaly don't know why such a short time after the weekend is needed, I'd prefer a 10 day window, and for non-scoring flights a 30 day window. Can someone pass this on to the OLC admins? The rationale for the Tuesday deadline is to "force" weekend flights, which are the bulk of the claims, to be posted in a timely fashion. Perhaps a scoring penalty could be applied to all flight claims... Your score is multiplied by 1.00 if submitted within 72 hours of the landing time. Then for the next 30 days, the multiplier is decremented until it reaches zero. Flights can still be posted, but they no longer get scored. While we're at it, I'd like to suggest tothe OLC committee that they settle on one format, and leave it that way for a very long period. In the last 4 years I've known of OLC they've changed the format, look & feel about 3 times, the last being the worst is terms of user friendlyness. Remember, the OLC is a "free" service provided by volunteers with some corporate sponsorship. The software developers don't have the luxury of hiring focus groups and teams of testers to decide what works and what doesn't. The first incarnation was likely an attempt to get something out for people to use and to validate the concept of the OLC. It was popular, so they proceeded to the next step, which was to beef it up and add features. That worked as well, but then a whole set of new ideas came up about usability, competition formats, methods of viewing or searching for flights, etc... So now we have the current version, which, after 6-8 months of field testing by us, is becoming quite stable and usable. I have found that the developers do accept comments and suggestions, but as with most "parents" of a product, don't take kindly to pure criticism. Don't tell them that something is bad. Instead tell them what changes could make it better. Be specific. And personally, I think the current version is quite friendly -Tom |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
OLC and badge / record claims
Snip....
The rationale for the Tuesday deadline is to "force" weekend flights, which are the bulk of the claims, to be posted in a timely fashion. A nice Eurocentric view where you can drive home every day from the gliderport ten miles away, but not practical from some remote US or other world sites where Internet access may not be readily available. That's why you're not seeing some record-breaking flights from the more remote locations - it's just not possible to post until you get back to civilization. As long as we have such artificial constraints, OLC will never achieve universal acceptance. Mike |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
OLC and badge / record claims
On Jul 20, 10:31 am, Mike the Strike wrote:
As long as we have such artificial constraints, OLC will never achieve universal acceptance. Agreed. -Tom |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
new world-record for Steve Fossett (USA) and Terry Delore
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
OLC and badge / record claims
And personally, I think the current version is quite friendly -Tom I personally find it far less user friendly than the version in use last summer. I don't even check other club members flights any more because it's such a struggle just finding today's flights. The morons who "improved" the website missed the mark badly. JMHO, Bullwinkle |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
OLC and badge / record claims
any news on his record? I see that Steve-O and Einar will be talking
Friday night at Oshkosh about the world altitude record. See you there! |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
new world-record for Steve Fossett (USA) and Terry Delore
AFAIK, you can post to olc anytime, even long after the deadline, it
is just not going to get any score, but the flight will be displayed. Ramy IMHO, I can't see making OLC posting a requirement, but it would be a great show of Sportsmanship if these kinds of flights were posted, but the next glitch comes with the Tuesday deadline for posting. I personnaly don't know why such a short time after the weekend is needed, I'd prefer a 10 day window, and for non-scoring flights a 30 day window. Can someone pass this on to the OLC admins? While we're at it, I'd like to suggest tothe OLC committee that they settle on one format, and leave it that way for a very long period. In the last 4 years I've known of OLC they've changed the format, look & feel about 3 times, the last being the worst is terms of user friendlyness. Wayne |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
new world-record for Steve Fossett (USA) and Terry Delore
Ramy wrote:
IMHO, I can't see making OLC posting a requirement, but it would be a great show of Sportsmanship if these kinds of flights were posted, but the next glitch comes with the Tuesday deadline for posting. I personnaly don't know why such a short time after the weekend is needed, I'd prefer a 10 day window, and for non-scoring flights a 30 day window. Can someone pass this on to the OLC admins? AFAIK, you can post to olc anytime, even long after the deadline, it is just not going to get any score, but the flight will be displayed. I just tried it, and the flight does not show up in the listing for that day (July 16, 2007). It does show up in the listing for the pilot (that's me); however, it doesn't show the distance, the glider is a Ventus instead of an ASH 26 E, the takeoff point is on the wrong side of the country, and the flight track is not shown. Pretty much a waste of time, even if the glider and takeoff point were correct. I do wish there was some allowance for when a pilot flies from a place with no Internet access. In my case, it meant a 40 mile roundtrip drive with 30 miles of gravel if I wanted to post the flight. I just noticed my most recent flight (July 17, 2006) also has the incorrect glider and takeoff point. I edited to correct the glider, but don't know how to correct the takeoff site. I hope they get those problems fixed before my next flight. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Steve Fossett Book - and other new stuff | Paul Remde | Soaring | 3 | November 17th 06 04:50 PM |
Steve Fossett-Fuel? | SA | General Aviation | 1 | March 8th 05 08:39 PM |
Delore & Fossett soar 2190 km | Burt Compton | Soaring | 16 | December 17th 04 04:58 PM |
new records (Out&Return) for Delore-Fossett in Argentina | cernauta | Soaring | 0 | November 17th 03 02:06 PM |
Delore-Fossett new 750k triangle record | Stewart Kissel | Soaring | 1 | July 31st 03 12:29 PM |