|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
September 1st 03, 09:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 12:48:58 +0000 (UTC),
wrote: Best example is a guy I know who doesn't want a 150 hp version of a Cessna 150 aerobat because of the fuel burn. Silly... plane silly...  heh! A 150hp Aerobat is the *only* Cessna 150 I'd consider buying :-) 
|
|
#32
September 1st 03, 10:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Mitch Hines wrote:
not true once Mooney put their tail on it. In my opinion, Mooney did Fred Weick's design a great disservice. The M10 may be a great little plane, but it just ain't the same bird. I think they probably did it because they wanted a conventional trainer. Although I hated the M10, I have to admit it generated a LOT of attention when I would taxi into an airport. Not to many people have seen one. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Say NO to useless over-quoting! Just quote a few lines to get the point across, not the whole goddamn thing, OK? Thanks! :-) ------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
