A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Landing Lights at NAPA



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 21st 05, 02:14 AM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Landing Lights at NAPA

In discussing our relatively new Skycraft landing lights (the
cut-into-the-leading-edge-of-the-wings type) here the other day, I noted
that I had just burned out a GE 4509 after around 35 hours. This surprised
me, since, being out in the wing, I expected there to be less
filament-killing vibration, and had hoped for a longer life from the
conventional bulb.

So, after it burned out, I ordered a Q4509 -- the quartz-halogen equivalent,
with a proven much longer life -- from Spruce, which arrived today.

Imagine my surprise when I get to the hangar, turn the lights on (because,
of course, I can't remember which light is burned out) -- and NEITHER wing
landing light works. At first I suspected a blown circuit breaker, but, no,
the OTHER 4509 had also blown, within 30 minutes of its mate.

I'll say this about them: They may be junk bulbs, but at least they are
*consistent* junk bulbs.

:-)

So, not wanting to wait another week for Spruce, I headed over to my FBO,
who (of course) only had 4509s in stock, for some OUTRAGEOUS price. I
declined, figuring if I'm going to pay thirty bucks for a stupid light bulb,
I wanted it to be the long-life quartz one.

Then, I think, hey -- didn't I remember you guys talking about "tractor bulb
equivalents" and the like? So, I pointed the Grape toward my local NAPA
auto parts store, burnt-out bulb in hand, and simply handed it to the guy
behind the counter and asked for a direct replacement.

To my delight, he instantly produced a NAPA equivalent bulb, made by Wagner,
same number (4509) and everything. Best of all, it costs a whole $13.49.

Unfortunately, they don't make a quartz equivalent, so I suspect I'll be
replacing this bulb in another couple of months -- but it's just nice to
have a cheap, locally available alternative. Heck, the box even SAYS
"aircraft light" on it -- so it's probably even legal!

:-)
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #2  
Old October 21st 05, 03:40 AM
Bob Chilcoat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Landing Lights at NAPA

Jay,

Perhaps they're trying to tell you something. Have you checked that the
voltage regulator is not spiking significantly over 14V? Just a thought.

--
Bob (Chief Pilot, White Knuckle Airways)


"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:eiX5f.451061$_o.173822@attbi_s71...
In discussing our relatively new Skycraft landing lights (the
cut-into-the-leading-edge-of-the-wings type) here the other day, I noted
that I had just burned out a GE 4509 after around 35 hours. This
surprised me, since, being out in the wing, I expected there to be less
filament-killing vibration, and had hoped for a longer life from the
conventional bulb.

So, after it burned out, I ordered a Q4509 -- the quartz-halogen
equivalent, with a proven much longer life -- from Spruce, which arrived
today.

Imagine my surprise when I get to the hangar, turn the lights on (because,
of course, I can't remember which light is burned out) -- and NEITHER wing
landing light works. At first I suspected a blown circuit breaker, but,
no, the OTHER 4509 had also blown, within 30 minutes of its mate.

I'll say this about them: They may be junk bulbs, but at least they are
*consistent* junk bulbs.

:-)

So, not wanting to wait another week for Spruce, I headed over to my FBO,
who (of course) only had 4509s in stock, for some OUTRAGEOUS price. I
declined, figuring if I'm going to pay thirty bucks for a stupid light
bulb, I wanted it to be the long-life quartz one.

Then, I think, hey -- didn't I remember you guys talking about "tractor
bulb equivalents" and the like? So, I pointed the Grape toward my local
NAPA auto parts store, burnt-out bulb in hand, and simply handed it to the
guy behind the counter and asked for a direct replacement.

To my delight, he instantly produced a NAPA equivalent bulb, made by
Wagner, same number (4509) and everything. Best of all, it costs a whole
$13.49.

Unfortunately, they don't make a quartz equivalent, so I suspect I'll be
replacing this bulb in another couple of months -- but it's just nice to
have a cheap, locally available alternative. Heck, the box even SAYS
"aircraft light" on it -- so it's probably even legal!

:-)
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"



  #3  
Old October 21st 05, 03:49 AM
Don Tuite
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Landing Lights at NAPA

Did you notice that the NAPA bulb didn't have the tit on the back that
the aviation bulb of the same number had? The tit fits into a notch
in the sheet metal that the bulb goes into and aligns the filament in
a certain orientation.

When I put a NAPA bulb into our 235, our mechanic worried aloud that
if we had a crash and the crash investigators found the titless bulb,
there'd be trouble. (And of course, the landing-light assembly would
inevitably survive the crash,thanks to Murphy.)

Comments invited.

Don
  #4  
Old October 21st 05, 03:58 AM
sfb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Landing Lights at NAPA

Anybody old enough to fly a plane already knows tits are expensive.

"Don Tuite" wrote in message
...
Did you notice that the NAPA bulb didn't have the tit on the back that
the aviation bulb of the same number had? The tit fits into a notch
in the sheet metal that the bulb goes into and aligns the filament in
a certain orientation.

When I put a NAPA bulb into our 235, our mechanic worried aloud that
if we had a crash and the crash investigators found the titless bulb,
there'd be trouble. (And of course, the landing-light assembly would
inevitably survive the crash,thanks to Murphy.)

Comments invited.

Don



  #5  
Old October 21st 05, 04:51 AM
Bob Fry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Landing Lights at NAPA

"DT" == Don Tuite writes:

DT When I put a NAPA bulb into our 235, our mechanic worried
DT aloud that if we had a crash and the crash investigators found
DT the titless bulb, there'd be trouble.

Damn...only geeks could worry about a titless *bulb*.
  #6  
Old October 21st 05, 05:03 AM
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Landing Lights at NAPA


"Don Tuite" wrote in message
...
Did you notice that the NAPA bulb didn't have the tit on the back that
the aviation bulb of the same number had? The tit fits into a notch
in the sheet metal that the bulb goes into and aligns the filament in
a certain orientation.

When I put a NAPA bulb into our 235, our mechanic worried aloud that
if we had a crash and the crash investigators found the titless bulb,
there'd be trouble. (And of course, the landing-light assembly would
inevitably survive the crash,thanks to Murphy.)

Comments invited.

Don


The Wagner 4509 aircraft lamps from Farm and Fleet are anatomically correct
and the last time I bought some they were well under $10.00 each. .


  #7  
Old October 21st 05, 05:04 AM
Jim Burns
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Landing Lights at NAPA

So, not wanting to wait another week for Spruce, I headed over to my FBO,
who (of course) only had 4509s in stock, for some OUTRAGEOUS price. I
declined, figuring if I'm going to pay thirty bucks for a stupid light

bulb,
I wanted it to be the long-life quartz one.



I'd buy a dozen, jack up the price, sell them to your FBO, and tell them
they are getting a hell of a deal! It would serve them right.
Jim


  #8  
Old October 21st 05, 06:00 AM
N93332
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Landing Lights at NAPA

"Don Tuite" wrote in message
...
Did you notice that the NAPA bulb didn't have the tit on the back that
the aviation bulb of the same number had? The tit fits into a notch
in the sheet metal that the bulb goes into and aligns the filament in
a certain orientation.

When I put a NAPA bulb into our 235, our mechanic worried aloud that
if we had a crash and the crash investigators found the titless bulb,
there'd be trouble. (And of course, the landing-light assembly would
inevitably survive the crash,thanks to Murphy.)


Just make sure that if you crash that you destroy the titless bulbs. ;-)

-Greg B.


  #9  
Old October 21st 05, 12:50 PM
Jimmy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Landing Lights at NAPA


"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:eiX5f.451061$_o.173822@attbi_s71...
In discussing our relatively new Skycraft landing lights (the
cut-into-the-leading-edge-of-the-wings type) here the other day, I noted
that I had just burned out a GE 4509 after around 35 hours. This
surprised me, since, being out in the wing, I expected there to be less
filament-killing vibration, and had hoped for a longer life from the
conventional bulb.

So, after it burned out, I ordered a Q4509 -- the quartz-halogen
equivalent, with a proven much longer life -- from Spruce, which arrived
today.

Imagine my surprise when I get to the hangar, turn the lights on (because,
of course, I can't remember which light is burned out) -- and NEITHER wing
landing light works. At first I suspected a blown circuit breaker, but,
no, the OTHER 4509 had also blown, within 30 minutes of its mate.

I'll say this about them: They may be junk bulbs, but at least they are
*consistent* junk bulbs.

:-)

So, not wanting to wait another week for Spruce, I headed over to my FBO,
who (of course) only had 4509s in stock, for some OUTRAGEOUS price. I
declined, figuring if I'm going to pay thirty bucks for a stupid light
bulb, I wanted it to be the long-life quartz one.

Then, I think, hey -- didn't I remember you guys talking about "tractor
bulb equivalents" and the like? So, I pointed the Grape toward my local
NAPA auto parts store, burnt-out bulb in hand, and simply handed it to the
guy behind the counter and asked for a direct replacement.

To my delight, he instantly produced a NAPA equivalent bulb, made by
Wagner, same number (4509) and everything. Best of all, it costs a whole
$13.49.

Unfortunately, they don't make a quartz equivalent, so I suspect I'll be
replacing this bulb in another couple of months -- but it's just nice to
have a cheap, locally available alternative. Heck, the box even SAYS
"aircraft light" on it -- so it's probably even legal!

:-)
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"



  #10  
Old October 21st 05, 01:36 PM
Doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Landing Lights at NAPA

Yah, I like everything I own to have tits.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? tom pettit Home Built 35 September 29th 05 02:24 PM
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
Cuban Missle Crisis - Ron Knott Greasy Rider© @invalid.com Naval Aviation 0 June 2nd 05 09:14 PM
HID Landing lights at wholsale - one time offer Blueskies Home Built 1 March 18th 05 03:36 AM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.