Should I be scared -- C172 over Gross

Mxsmanic wrote:

When have I been mean and negative?

You have been hostile and negative nearly all the time during your
participation here, and you continue to be this way. That you are
insufficiently capable of introspection to understand this is well
understood.
--
dgs

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Benjamin Dover writes:

Here's one he posted today in VATSIM in response to someone who
pointed out that in trains is a "dead man's" button which, if
controls are not touched every few minutes, set off an alarm. Said
Anthony, "Aircraft have this, too, at least in real life, although it
doesn't seem to be simulated, at least not by PMDG." He really
doesn't know **** from shinola.

The 747-400 has three levels of alarm. All appear as PILOT RESPONSE
on the EICAS, the first being an advisory without an audible alarm,
the second a caution with a beeper, and the third a warning with a
siren. The 777 (at least, not sure about others) also has this alarm,
and I presume it works in much the same way. I'm sure it's
configurable by operators.

This from someone who had to ask where the handle for the ejector seat on
his Baron was located. And from someone who tells us about flying his
Baron from Phoenix to Las Vegas "In the real world, when you have VFR
traffic in your airspace that you're not talking to, does the traffic
usually follow established airways, or fly mostly direct to obvious fixes
(like VORs or major waypoints), or does VFR traffic tend to be all over the
place?"

How about your boasts of all your flying experience and how you prefer IFR,
Anthony? If you had any experience whatsoever, why did you need to ask in
VATSIM today (4/25/2008) "When flying IFR under ATC, am I required to use
only altimeter settings provided by ATC, or can I listen to the ATIS of a
nearby airport and set my altimeter that way?" Any IFR rated pilot knows
the answer and why. Hell, private pilots know the answer and why while
still student pilots. You don't. You're not a pilot. YOU DON'T KNOW ****
FROM SHINOLA. YOU ARE AN IMPOSTER. A POSER. A PHONY!

Mxsmanic wrote:

I'm always positive and friendly.

No, you're not. You are neither positive nor friendly. You are
typically negative and hostile.

It doesn't work.

Yes, your approach of being negative and hostile doesn't work. It never
has, and it never will.
--
dgs

dgs writes:

You have been hostile and negative nearly all the time during your
participation here, and you continue to be this way. That you are
insufficiently capable of introspection to understand this is well
understood.

Weren't you complaining about me not discussing aviation just a post or two
ago?

Mxsmanic wrote:

dgs writes:


So... just what the *HELL* does this have to do with
aviation, whiny-boi?


Nothing.

So you admit that this has nothing to do with aviation, but you continue
to post anyway. This makes you a liar. Why do you lie so much?

But people who dislike me regularly divert any discussion in which I
participate to a discussion of me personally.

So? And this forces you to post more of your babbling non-aviation-
related drivel then? Do these "people who dislike you" somehow reach
out and force you to post your off-topic crap? If you don't care about
such people, why do you even bother to respond? And, again:

Why do you continue to lie so much?

Perhaps they secretly admire
me, if they find me so much more interesting than the topic at hand.

What does this have to do with aviation? Why do you lie so much?

A personal attack names its target. Nobody would be insulted by what I say
unless he voluntarily considers himself a clueless kiddie, which is his choice
(and revealing of his own self-evaluation) and not mine.

What does this steaming pile of solipsistic self-delusional crap have to
do with aviation? Why do you lie so much?
--
dgs

Benjamin Dover writes:

This from someone who had to ask where the handle for the ejector seat on
his Baron was located.

I don't recall asking such a question.

Any IFR rated pilot knows the answer and why.

There are a lot of things that IFR-rated pilots are supposed to know that they
don't.

On Apr 26, 9:40*am, Benjamin Dover wrote:
terry wrote :





On Apr 26, 1:18*am, gatt wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote:
gatt writes:

Who else here "discusses aviation" with you?

There are several people here who seem level-headed, but I won't
name th
em,
lest the treehouse club add them to the target list.

Surely somebody will step forward and defend you.

Why? *I can defend myself very well indeed.

You completely missed yet another point.

I did in fact defend him for some time, *but later felt the need to
apologise to the group, for my behaviour in doing that.
As a relatively inexperienced pilot I guess I didnt fully appreciate
the annoyance that airline pilots and instructors would feel being
told they were wrong (without substantiating evidence) by someone who
had never flown in his life. *As a PhD in physical chemisty ,my
attitude changed somewhat when he tried to tell me how the Universal
Gas Law didnt apply in the atmophere, despite several polite attempts
on my part to explain otherwise. *There is nothing wrong with being
wrong, as long as you learn from the experience. It is the complete
and utter inability to accept and acknowledge when he is wrong that is
so irritating. *If he wasnt such an obnoxious character and wasnt
16000 km away I would otherwise have loved to take him up ( gratis),
although I suspect there is something else lacking that would have
prevented him from accepting.

Don't feel bad. *You're not the first one to try and work with the
MXSmoron. *Many of the posters who now bash him also tried.



I have a suggestion, why dont we have a collection and *send Anthony
off on a trial instructional flight on the proviso that the instructor
publishes an account of his peformance on this group? *I'll contribute
$20
What about it Anthony , are you up for it?

This offer has been made before and more than once. *Anthony is too CS to
to go up in a small airplane. *But, then again, he is to CS to experience
real life.

For a laugh, look at Anthony's user profile in Wikipedia:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Agateller

For more laughs, look go to his profile in VATSIM and then click on "Find
all posts by Anthony Atkielski 985811". *There are some real pilots and
controllers there, but it is amazing how idiots like Anthony can't
understand what the people who do this stuff in real life are trying to
explain to him. *Like Anthony's claim that, similar to trains, there is a
"dead mans" switch in airplane cockpits, but they are not simulated.

Anthony's VATSIM profile can be found at:http://forums.vatsim.net/profile.php...ofile&u=985811

Just my own observation, have had read access to both this newsgroup AND
the old COMPUSERV AVSIG news group for well over two decades now. *A lot of
people with some great experiences that they were willing to share have
left because of the harrassment they got from the Anthony's who post here. *
Even Splaps Tarver and the Rockaway Loon have shown far more knowledge and
understanding about aviation than Anthony, despite his claims to
intelligence, ever will. *Even the fish who's name we no longer mention
would rank above Anthony in understanding aviation, although not by much. *
It is very fortunate that we have some stalwarts like Dudly and the Bunyip
who ignore Anthony's ravings and continue to generously give this newsgroup
the benefit of their hard earned experience and knowledge.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

For someone with such supposedly high levels of IT skills, which
demand high paid salaries, why does he cry poor?

terry wrote in
:

On Apr 26, 9:40*am, Benjamin Dover wrote:
terry wrote
innews:c5c4bd2f-93de-45fd-928e-6feca69
:





On Apr 26, 1:18*am, gatt wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote:
gatt writes:

Who else here "discusses aviation" with you?

There are several people here who seem level-headed, but I won't
name th
em,
lest the treehouse club add them to the target list.

Surely somebody will step forward and defend you.

Why? *I can defend myself very well indeed.

You completely missed yet another point.

I did in fact defend him for some time, *but later felt the need to
apologise to the group, for my behaviour in doing that.
As a relatively inexperienced pilot I guess I didnt fully
appreciate the annoyance that airline pilots and instructors would
feel being told they were wrong (without substantiating evidence)
by someone who had never flown in his life. *As a PhD in physical
chemisty ,my attitude changed somewhat when he tried to tell me how
the Universal Gas Law didnt apply in the atmophere, despite several
polite attempts on my part to explain otherwise. *There is nothing
wrong with being wrong, as long as you learn from the experience.
It is the complete and utter inability to accept and acknowledge
when he is wrong that is so irritating. *If he wasnt such an
obnoxious character and wasnt 16000 km away I would otherwise have
loved to take him up ( gratis), although I suspect there is
something else lacking that would have prevented him from
accepting.

Don't feel bad. *You're not the first one to try and work with the
MXSmoron. *Many of the posters who now bash him also tried.



I have a suggestion, why dont we have a collection and *send
Anthony off on a trial instructional flight on the proviso that the
instructor publishes an account of his peformance on this group?
*I'll contribute

$20
What about it Anthony , are you up for it?

This offer has been made before and more than once. *Anthony is too
CS t
o
to go up in a small airplane. *But, then again, he is to CS to
experienc
e
real life.

For a laugh, look at Anthony's user profile in
Wikipedia:http://en.wikiped
ia.org/wiki/User:Agateller

For more laughs, look go to his profile in VATSIM and then click on
"Find all posts by Anthony Atkielski 985811". *There are some real
pilots and controllers there, but it is amazing how idiots like
Anthony can't understand what the people who do this stuff in real
life are trying to explain to him. *Like Anthony's claim that,
similar to trains, there is
a
"dead mans" switch in airplane cockpits, but they are not simulated.

Anthony's VATSIM profile can be found
at:http://forums.vatsim.net/profile.
php?mode=viewprofile&u=985811

Just my own observation, have had read access to both this newsgroup
AND the old COMPUSERV AVSIG news group for well over two decades now.
*A lot
of
people with some great experiences that they were willing to share
have left because of the harrassment they got from the Anthony's who
post here.
*
Even Splaps Tarver and the Rockaway Loon have shown far more
knowledge and

understanding about aviation than Anthony, despite his claims to
intelligence, ever will. *Even the fish who's name we no longer
mention would rank above Anthony in understanding aviation, although
not by much.
*
It is very fortunate that we have some stalwarts like Dudly and the
Bunyip

who ignore Anthony's ravings and continue to generously give this
newsgrou
p
the benefit of their hard earned experience and knowledge.- Hide
quoted te
xt -

- Show quoted text -

For someone with such supposedly high levels of IT skills, which
demand high paid salaries, why does he cry poor?





Nobody will give him a job.


Bertie

On Apr 26, 12:05 pm, terry wrote:
- Show quoted text -

For someone with such supposedly high levels of IT skills, which
demand high paid salaries, why does he cry poor?

Incompetence has its own rewards...... ?

Mxsmanic wrote:
Dudley Henriques writes:

I can prove that to you easily. Try posting to me in a positive and
friendly manner and I'll be happy to respond in kind.

I'm always positive and friendly. It doesn't work.

Well I'll make a deal with you Anthony, as I notice that you are indeed
attracting a WHOLE lot of flack on the forum.

Tell you what Anthony. I'll promise you right here and now, with the
entire forum watching, that if you will post sincere aviation related
dialog to me personally, from this post onward I will answer you with
respect and matching sincerity.
Perhaps if you and I begin such a dialog, maybe we can turn this thing
around for you.
I don't know how to be more fair than this. I'd like nothing better than
to see your situation get better around here. I'm more than willing to
meet you half way on this.
Let's you and I start something positive.
What have you got to lose? Give it a try.

--
Dudley Henriques