A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"STOVL could damage sensitive equipment on decks"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 26th 08, 08:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Mike[_7_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 111
Default "STOVL could damage sensitive equipment on decks"

No problem, a yatch will be fine to land on.
Mike

Inside the Navy
STOVL could damage sensitive equipment on decks

NEW TEAM WILL LOOK AT POTENTIAL INCOMPATIBILITY OF JSF WITH AMPHIBS
Date: March 24, 2008

The Navy has commissioned an integration team to deal with concerns
that the short-take-off-and-vertical-landing (STOVL) version of the
Joint Strike Fighter could damage sensitive equipment on new LHA-6
large-deck amphibious assault ships, according to Vice Adm. Paul
Sullivan, commander of Naval Sea Systems Command. The JSF is much more
powerful and has a hotter exhaust than the AV-8B Harrier aircraft,
which is currently used, "so you worry about things like the
insulation on the overhead of the deck below the flight center,"
Sullivan told Inside the Navy March 20 after his presentation at the
Navy League's annual Sea-Air-Space exposition in Washington. Sensitive
equipment such as antennas, gun systems and ammunition on the deck
could also be at risk, which is why a team will examine these
potential issues in detail, the admiral said. The integration team
will be run by one- and two-star officials "because we thought it
serious enough to make sure that [it has] the proper attention on it,"
he said. "We're working on a host of about, oh I'd say 30 or 40
issues, none of which is a show-stopper, but each one of them has to
have the risk profile assigned to it." The team will create a "burn-
down" list of risks and assign people to deal with those risks,
Sullivan said. "Getting all that set up is probably going to take us
about another month," he said. The admiral said that most of the
problems should get worked out in the next couple of years -- well
before the STOVL variant's scheduled initial operational capability
(IOC) in 2012. The next-generation LHA-6 is designed to replace the
Tarawa-class vessels. The LHA-6 is expected to be a gas-turbine-
powered ship supporting a Marine Expeditionary Brigade with JSFs, V-22
Ospreys and other aircraft. The Northrop Grumman-built ships are
scheduled for delivery in 2012, about the same time as the JSF. In
January, Capt. Bruce Nichols, director of the Navy's mine warfare
branch, warned that the Navy's LSD and LHD ships -- which ferry
soldiers, amphibious craft and aircraft to battle zones -- would need
to be modified because of the JSF's powerful down-wash, which is two
to three times the strength of the AV-8B aircraft. Nichols said then
that officials would look at ways to modify the ships as they go
through their mid-life modernization programs, which will last three
years and cost about $9 billion
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Phrase "landing runway" vs. "cleared to land" Robert M. Gary Piloting 168 February 5th 08 05:32 PM
Phrase "landing runway" vs. "cleared to land" Robert M. Gary Instrument Flight Rules 137 February 5th 08 05:32 PM
"Rolling the Equipment" Judah Piloting 6 August 20th 07 07:27 AM
Old polish aircraft TS-8 "Bies" ("Bogy") - for sale >pk Aviation Marketplace 0 October 16th 06 07:48 AM
STOVL and CTOL from big decks - deconflicting ? John S. Shinal Naval Aviation 15 March 8th 04 04:44 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.