A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

$400,000 for VFR only



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 3rd 05, 10:57 PM
Chris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default $400,000 for VFR only

This link is interesting.

http://forums.flyer.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=11635

The story is that in the UK and most of Europe the all glass Cirrus
including the 22 is only suitable for VFR flights only.

Whilst the GPS may be IFR certified in the US, Its not in the UK. also with
DME and ADF it only possible to fly 4 instrument approaches legally in the
UK.

Retrofitting DME and ADF is sure going to spoil a pretty panel.

Maybe Cirrus will have to work out a way around to allow its aircraft to fly
IFR in IMC.

Its a shame really because there are lots of potential Cirrus owners in the
UK and with the depreciation of the dollar effectively paying for the VAT on
import they are could be a good buy.

Its a pretty expensive plane to have sports plane privileges only

cb


  #2  
Old February 4th 05, 12:21 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Chris" wrote in message
...
This link is interesting.

http://forums.flyer.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=11635

The story is that in the UK and most of Europe the all glass Cirrus
including the 22 is only suitable for VFR flights only.


Too bad. The reason, of course, is that Europe would rather remain in the
last century rather than open their markets to real competition.

They view laws against unfair trade practices as a weapon to suppress free
trade instead of a tool to encourage it.


  #3  
Old February 4th 05, 08:16 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, that is not the reason.
As I recall right the Cirrus aircraft are not JAA approved as a whole.
If I remember well it has something to do with the stall tests.

And the same works the other way, if a part or plane is JAA approved it
is not automatically FAA approved so no change of using it in the US.

And this is not only related to aircraft(parts).
Buy a used or classic car in the US and try to have it legaly road
going here you have to change at least the seat belts and head- and
tail lights to CE standards.
And then you are lucky, wait if something enviromental pops up :-(
Export a car to the US and you have the same trouble again.

And there are more regions in the world with their own standards and
rules.
It sometimes drives one mad.

-Kees

  #4  
Old February 4th 05, 10:00 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

As I recall right the Cirrus aircraft are not JAA approved as a whole.


The SR20 is, AFAIK.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #5  
Old February 4th 05, 12:03 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Oops, didn't do my homework.
-Kees

  #6  
Old February 5th 05, 05:30 PM
Paul Tomblin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In a previous article, "C J Campbell" said:
The story is that in the UK and most of Europe the all glass Cirrus
including the 22 is only suitable for VFR flights only.


Too bad. The reason, of course, is that Europe would rather remain in the
last century rather than open their markets to real competition.

They view laws against unfair trade practices as a weapon to suppress free
trade instead of a tool to encourage it.


Why is it that if the JAA refuses to IFR certify a plane that the FAA IFR
certifes, like this all-glass Cirrus, it's "unfair trade practices", but
if the FAA refuses to IFR certify a plane that the JAA *does* certify for
IFR flight, like the Diamond DA-20, it's just "the FAA doesn't have to
take orders from those damn Europeans"?


--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education."
-- Albert Einstein.
  #7  
Old February 5th 05, 06:44 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
...
In a previous article, "C J Campbell"

said:
The story is that in the UK and most of Europe the all glass Cirrus
including the 22 is only suitable for VFR flights only.


Too bad. The reason, of course, is that Europe would rather remain in the
last century rather than open their markets to real competition.

They view laws against unfair trade practices as a weapon to suppress

free
trade instead of a tool to encourage it.


Why is it that if the JAA refuses to IFR certify a plane that the FAA IFR
certifes, like this all-glass Cirrus, it's "unfair trade practices", but
if the FAA refuses to IFR certify a plane that the JAA *does* certify for
IFR flight, like the Diamond DA-20, it's just "the FAA doesn't have to
take orders from those damn Europeans"?


No, I think that at root you will still find people trying to stifle
competition with unfair trade practices. I am equally dismayed by the
behavior of the United States in this area.


  #8  
Old February 5th 05, 07:48 PM
Chris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
...
In a previous article, "C J Campbell"
said:
The story is that in the UK and most of Europe the all glass Cirrus
including the 22 is only suitable for VFR flights only.


Too bad. The reason, of course, is that Europe would rather remain in the
last century rather than open their markets to real competition.

They view laws against unfair trade practices as a weapon to suppress free
trade instead of a tool to encourage it.


Why is it that if the JAA refuses to IFR certify a plane that the FAA IFR
certifes, like this all-glass Cirrus, it's "unfair trade practices", but
if the FAA refuses to IFR certify a plane that the JAA *does* certify for
IFR flight, like the Diamond DA-20, it's just "the FAA doesn't have to
take orders from those damn Europeans"?


Its mainly about the use of GPS and the lack of appropriate radio nav
instruments for the approaches in Europe. Unlike in the US, ADF and DME is
widely used for instrument approaches and GPS is not allowed as a substitute
because GPS is not certified for IFR. It is only allowed as a supporting aid
so the big fancy 480s and 530s are as much value as a handheld.
Planes made in Europe and certified for IFR flight in Europe will meet US
requirements.

I suppose one of the issues is that VORs, DME and ADF are all controllable
locally, GPS is not.

If the FAA want to allow reliance on a system controlled by the US military
then is it up to them, you cannot expect other countries aviation
authorities to put their reliance on a system controlled by a foreign power.


  #9  
Old February 5th 05, 08:56 PM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Chris,

GPS is not allowed as a substitute
because GPS is not certified for IFR.


That statement in its broadness is not true

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #10  
Old February 5th 05, 08:56 PM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Paul,

Why is it that if the JAA refuses to IFR certify a plane that the FAA IFR
certifes, like this all-glass Cirrus, it's "unfair trade practices", but
if the FAA refuses to IFR certify a plane that the JAA *does* certify for
IFR flight, like the Diamond DA-20, it's just "the FAA doesn't have to
take orders from those damn Europeans"?


Huh? The SR20 IS certified, and the DA-20 is NOT IFR-certified anywhere in
the world.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.