Errors accessing FAA's Pilotweb

On Feb 13, 3:24*pm, "Steve Foley" wrote:
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in ...

Haha. That would be funny if he were playing a pirated copy of MSFS.
-Robert

He's written about his utilities being shut off, and constantly complains
about money.

I wonder why we've never heard him complain about the 15% self employment
tax he's liable for in the US for self employment income earned anywhere in
the world.

There's some kind of exclusion for income tax paid to other countries, but
it doesn't affect self employment tax. I wonder if the IRS knows he's self
employed.

It seems to me we should be grateful MX is not our problem, but that
of France. The attitude fits, as does the altitude.

Robert M. Gary writes:

That would be funny if he were playing a pirated copy of MSFS.

The copy I have is legitimate, and it cost $18.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...

It is not possible that both of these statements are true:

The only cost of flying for me is electricity

and

The copy I have is legitimate, and it cost $18.

On Feb 15, 12:55*am, "Beauciphus" wrote:
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message

...

It is not possible that both of these statements are true:

The only cost of flying for me is electricity

and

The copy I have is legitimate, and it cost $18.

There should be another nought in that figure or the statement isn't
correct.
But then we ARE dealing with mixedup

Beauciphus writes:

It is not possible that both of these statements are true:

The only cost of flying for me is electricity

and

The copy I have is legitimate, and it cost $18.

Actually it is, since the amortized cost of the software approaches zero as
the flying time approaches infinity.

george writes:

There should be another nought in that figure or the statement isn't
correct.

That's the price it is currently selling for.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Beauciphus writes:

It is not possible that both of these statements are true:

The only cost of flying for me is electricity

and

The copy I have is legitimate, and it cost $18.

Actually it is, since the amortized cost of the software approaches zero
as
the flying time approaches infinity.

Not too good at math either, are you.

APPROACHING zero is not EQUAL TO zero.

And your FLYING time is not approaching infinity, your FLYING time is equal
to zero.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
george writes:

There should be another nought in that figure or the statement isn't
correct.

That's the price it is currently selling for.

How is the current price relevant for something you claim to have owned for
several years?

You need to keep your lies straight.

In article ,
Mxsmanic wrote:

Beauciphus writes:

It is not possible that both of these statements are true:

The only cost of flying for me is electricity

and

The copy I have is legitimate, and it cost $18.

Actually it is, since the amortized cost of the software approaches zero as
the flying time approaches infinity.

Planning to live forever, eh?

--
Mike Ash
Radio Free Earth
Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon

On Feb 14, 1:52*pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Beauciphus writes:
It is not possible that both of these statements are true:

The only cost of flying for me is electricity

and

The copy I have is legitimate, and it cost $18.

Actually it is, since the amortized cost of the software approaches zero as
the flying time approaches infinity.

Can you provide a link to where you can purchase such software
(legally) for $18?

-Robert