If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Do you support establishing a US Club Class? Yes answers only!
Hello All:
If you have not figured it out, this is a topic I care passionnately about... Could we try and give the members of the US RC that post here/read opinions here regularly an idea of the possible support for establishing a stand alone US Club Class Nationals? I recognize that the devil is alwawsy in the details, but please answer yes to the following question, maybe a substantial turn-out might impress upon the RC/USSTC. While I appreciate the anti-Club Class Camp and their arguments, supporters need to come up with some sort of data to support the viability or confirm the impossibility of this Class here in the USA. So, if you are not a supporter of this concept, or you do not affirmatively know of a pilot who might be willing to fly such a class, please do not post to this thread. Question: Would you, or someone you know, would willingly fly or offer your Club Class glider to someone who would fly at a stand-alone US Club Class Nationals? Thank You, Tim S. McAllister EY 2004,2006 US Team - Club Class 2005, 2007 FAI World GP |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Do you support establishing a US Club Class? Yes answers only!
On Sep 21, 12:13*pm, Tim wrote:
Hello All: If you have not figured it out, this is a topic I care passionnately about... Could we try and give the members of the US RC that post here/read opinions here regularly an idea of the possible support for establishing a stand alone US Club Class Nationals? I recognize that the devil is alwawsy in the details, but please answer yes to the following question, maybe a substantial turn-out might impress upon the RC/USSTC. While I appreciate the anti-Club Class Camp and their arguments, supporters need to come up with some sort of data to support the viability or confirm the impossibility of this Class here in the USA. So, if you are not a supporter of this concept, or you do not affirmatively know of a pilot who might be willing to fly such a class, please do not post to this thread. Question: Would you, or someone you know, would willingly fly or offer your Club Class glider to someone who would fly at a stand-alone US Club Class Nationals? Thank You, Tim S. McAllister EY 2004,2006 US Team - Club Class 2005, 2007 FAI World GP what would be the problem with running Sports Class and Club Class nationals concurrently, like appears to be done in Australia. One big happy handicapped contest. So then basically you'll have the same contest as you do now but Club Class gliders will get scored separately from the rest so the Club Class winner can go on the US Team. Then the people on the World Team actually have won a national contest. Plus, then who cares if only 5 pilots sign up for Club Class and the other 50 fly for Sports Class. The 5 will run for the world team and the 50 will fly for bragging rights and a trophy. I don't know much about the history and current situation of Club Class but it seems to me if you are going to qualify for the US Club Class Team you should fly a Club Class glider as defined by the FAI. Obviously Tim and Sean feel this way too. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Do you support establishing a US Club Class? Yes answers only!
On Sep 21, 1:13*pm, Tim wrote:
Hello All: If you have not figured it out, this is a topic I care passionnately about... Could we try and give the members of the US RC that post here/read opinions here regularly an idea of the possible support for establishing a stand alone US Club Class Nationals? I recognize that the devil is alwawsy in the details, but please answer yes to the following question, maybe a substantial turn-out might impress upon the RC/USSTC. While I appreciate the anti-Club Class Camp and their arguments, supporters need to come up with some sort of data to support the viability or confirm the impossibility of this Class here in the USA. So, if you are not a supporter of this concept, or you do not affirmatively know of a pilot who might be willing to fly such a class, please do not post to this thread. Question: Would you, or someone you know, would willingly fly or offer your Club Class glider to someone who would fly at a stand-alone US Club Class Nationals? Thank You, Tim S. McAllister EY 2004,2006 US Team - Club Class 2005, 2007 FAI World GP I'd fly it. Several people in my club would, also, but I'll let them speak for themselves. For that matter what's the possibility of doing exactly this at next years Sports Nationals? Sarah flew in the club class event at Cordele last year and has expressed an interest in holding a club class event. -- Matt |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Do you support establishing a US Club Class? Yes answers only!
"Tim" wrote in message ... .... Snip ... Question: Would you, or someone you know, would willingly fly or offer your Club Class glider to someone who would fly at a stand-alone US Club Class Nationals? Tim, I have yet to enter a contest. I feel reluctant to drag my HP-14 to a location where I am competing with ASW-29s, etc. However, Club Class completion sound very appealing to me. Wayne HP-14 "6F" http://tinyurl.com/N990-6F |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Do you support establishing a US Club Class? Yes answers only!
On Sep 21, 12:13*pm, Tim wrote:
Hello All: If you have not figured it out, this is a topic I care passionnately about... Could we try and give the members of the US RC that post here/read opinions here regularly an idea of the possible support for establishing a stand alone US Club Class Nationals? I think you're mixing two issues: 1) having a contest labeled "club class nationals" that only allows club gliders 2) getting the US team committee to commit ahead of time to use the results of that contest, and only that contest, to select world team members. Issue #1 is pretty easy to solve. I can't speak for the entire RC, but I would certainly support a request to run a "club class super regionals" and probably even a "club class nationals." Heck, we allow a "senior nationals" so why not. As with many big changes, it's worth doing it by waiver for a few years to gauge success before permanently changing rules. It would have to be inserted carefully in the contest season --- the major objection to "club" is leaving the low performance and older high performance gliders nowhere to fly, so it should probably be on the other coast from the "sports nationals." But it seems like a reasonable idea. So, once again, if you want it, stop complaining and run it! Our major problem is finding operators and CDs willing to run contests. We'll look for your bid for next year. You might even be able to get one in for the 2011 season if you hurry. As for issue #2, well, try to understand the view of the very reasonable people on the team committee. When they look at sports class results under current rules, they see a very weak team; one that US pilots are not likely in the end to support with our hard-earned cash. (We've talked here about megabucks -- the real megabucks is what it costs to go to the worlds, any worlds.) It would be pretty irresponsible of them to change team selection rules to use results of a class that has had a grand total of two contests, and has not responded to the pilot and glider restrictions in sports class. I know you feel that "build it and they will come," if only there were a separate scoresheet and no asw27s buzzing around, we'd finally have 50 people at these nationals, not 10-14 that show up (and almost none two years in a row) despite the 27s not being eligible for team selection. But you have to understand that they really can't change rules based on a theory. If you run some "sports class nationals" by waiver, and lots of people show up, that is most likely to persuade them. You may say "people won't show up without team points." But they would answer "people aren't showing up now, despite team points, so team points must not be that important to the vast majority of pilots." And the team rankings back them up, in every class. See here http://soaringweb.org/US_Team/HomePage.html It's blatantly obvious that even in 15, 18, standard and PW5 that no more than 4 or 5 people care enough about team points to bother showing up to the same contest two years in a row. Anyway, that's my best guess at how the team committee thinks about it, and addressing that point of view is the most likely route to success. Just to be clear, there is nothing I would like to see more than a vibrant club class with 60 pilots duking it out every year, then going on to do well at the worlds. Make it happen. I think the whole RC and team committee feel that way. There is nobody, absolutely nobody, "against" club class. There is a worry that going about it wrong could hurt the very successful sports class, produce a small weak "specialist" class, and lead to more small contests that are money- losers for the organizers. Address those worries, and you'll get what you want. John Cochrane |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Do you support establishing a US Club Class? Yes answers only!
What is the Club Class?
How is that different from Sport Class? If it is a class where you can fly a lower performance glider with a handicap against others then I would be interested in flying. Like Wayne I have not entered a contest yet since it seems futile to do so with my Schreder HP-11 against all the modern glass. I think soaring contests in general would have wider appeal if they were accessable to more glider pilots. Anything that makes that possible would be a good thing in my opinion. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Do you support establishing a US Club Class? Yes answers only!
In article
, Tim wrote: Hello All: If you have not figured it out, this is a topic I care passionnately about... Could we try and give the members of the US RC that post here/read opinions here regularly an idea of the possible support for establishing a stand alone US Club Class Nationals? I recognize that the devil is alwawsy in the details, but please answer yes to the following question, maybe a substantial turn-out might impress upon the RC/USSTC. While I appreciate the anti-Club Class Camp and their arguments, supporters need to come up with some sort of data to support the viability or confirm the impossibility of this Class here in the USA. So, if you are not a supporter of this concept, or you do not affirmatively know of a pilot who might be willing to fly such a class, please do not post to this thread. Question: Would you, or someone you know, would willingly fly or offer your Club Class glider to someone who would fly at a stand-alone US Club Class Nationals? Thank You, Tim S. McAllister EY 2004,2006 US Team - Club Class 2005, 2007 FAI World GP I am very much in favor of the U.S. club class and have flown both that Region 5 has hosted. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Do you support establishing a US Club Class? Yes answers only!
On Sep 21, 3:24*pm, jb92563 wrote:
What is the Club Class? How is that different from Sport Class? If it is a class where you can fly a lower performance glider with a handicap against others then I would be interested in flying. Like Wayne I have not entered a contest yet since it seems futile to do so with my Schreder HP-11 against all the modern glass. I think soaring contests in general would have wider appeal if they were accessable to more glider pilots. Anything that makes that possible would be a good thing in my opinion. Don't worry about the performance of your glider. The GTA races (informal and not sanctioned) have the gamut of performance ships. I just competed in Region V West and we had a Silent competing. The handicap put him in the top few places every day even though his raw scores were near the bottom. 13 meters and still competitive. I would say that your first few contests will be a success if you make it around the course and don't embarrass yourself on the grid and landing. That has been my attitude this first year and I have had a blast at Perry and Chilhowee. Stated simply, don't refrain from competing because you are afraid you will not win! Enjoy the performance you already own and learn the ropes of competition - we need the participation and you will enjoy it. Lane XF |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Do you support establishing a US Club Class? Yes answers only!
In article
, Tony wrote: what would be the problem with running Sports Class and Club Class nationals concurrently, like appears to be done in Australia. One big happy handicapped contest. So then basically you'll have the same contest as you do now but Club Class gliders will get scored separately from the rest so the Club Class winner can go on the US Team. Then the people on the World Team actually have won a national contest. Plus, then who cares if only 5 pilots sign up for Club Class and the other 50 fly for Sports Class. The 5 will run for the world team and the 50 will fly for bragging rights and a trophy. I don't know much about the history and current situation of Club Class but it seems to me if you are going to qualify for the US Club Class Team you should fly a Club Class glider as defined by the FAI. Obviously Tim and Sean feel this way too. Great idea! In fact, it's so good that it was done at Cordele this past year. Sports and Club had similar tasks (a MAT and an assigned task can be very similar if the CD is clever). I think everyone was happy with the arrangement. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Do you support establishing a US Club Class? Yes answers only!
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:24:12 -0700, jb92563 wrote:
What is the Club Class? A handicapped list of gliders. The types included on the list and the handicaps they use are defined by the FAI. Only gliders on the list are eligible for the international Club class. How is that different from Sport Class? My understanding is that the SSA, like the BGA, has its own handicapping system which covers just about any glider that can be flown in a regional or national competition. The BGA's list certainly includes everything from the Falke and Slingsby T.21 to the ASW22bl and Nimbus 4. Like your Sports class the range of types is too wide to allow fair and sensible tasks to be set in weak conditions. So, an observation from the right side of the pond: I hope it may help this discussion. My club runs a Regionals every year that usually attracts 50-60 entries. All gliders are handicapped using the BGA handicaps. The gliders are split into two classes on the handicap. Each class is tasked separately, so the lower performance gliders can be given a shorter task, but both tasks are launched at almost the same time. The classes alternate position on the grid each day, typically with a short launching gap between classes, so they can use separate start times to ease congestion etc. The workload on the CD and organisation isn't much different from running a single task for all gliders. At first glance this split might work quite well for an American combined Club and Sports class contest with the main difference that Club class would only include gliders eligible for the FAI Club class. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Potential Club Class (US Sports Class) World Team Selection Policy Changes | John Godfrey (QT)[_2_] | Soaring | 84 | September 27th 10 08:03 PM |
Potential Club Class (US Sports Class) World Team SelectionPolicy Changes | JS | Soaring | 4 | September 22nd 10 04:55 PM |
Potential Club Class (US Sports Class) World Team SelectionPolicy Changes | Andy[_10_] | Soaring | 0 | September 19th 10 10:33 PM |
Establishing Club Class/Too Many Nationals/Not Enough Competitors | Tim[_2_] | Soaring | 14 | October 2nd 08 03:34 PM |
UK Open Class and Club Class Nationals - Lasham | Steve Dutton | Soaring | 0 | August 6th 03 10:07 PM |