A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Discus 2 Optimal CG location



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
Old June 26th 18, 06:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Michael Opitz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 318
Default Discus 2 Optimal CG location

At 04:16 26 June 2018, wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 June 2018 15:36:52 UTC+12, Ben Coleman

wrote:
Wheel will be a bit different location if spring is different strength

or
deformed (and/or glider is different empty weight) but correct

measurement
of arms and moments makes it irrelevant.

Cheers Ben


Yes, that is our conclusion too. I have heard some people chock

the landing
gear extension somehow.

FWIW, we have measurements of 140 and 4285. The SH manual

says 128 and 4278
(128+4150).

The 12mm makes a significant difference to the CG calculation -

90% aft vs
84% aft with the factory arms.

The lesson is to be a little careful of the factory arms, even in a

glider
with no damage history.

The 90% aft value ties in well with Bif's value above and it does

feel good
for thermalling, but you quickly start wishing for less aft weight

when the
trim is fully forward and you still need plenty of forward stick

pressure
when running.


The factory set my D-2b up using the 4.4/100 aft fuselage blocking,
and the 128/4150 measurements. Mine has the 5" larger main
wheel option, as well as the tail wheel instead of the stock skid. If
these options have different arms from stock, S-H did not use them.
S-H set it up for a minimum seat load of ~190 Lbs (87 Kg) with
the empty C/G point at 681 mm (with an allowed range of 617 -
700 mm). At the time, I weighed ~210 Lbs with chute, so I was
about 20 Lbs above the minimum seat load by their calculations,
and that is where they thought it would be optimum for me to race
at. They did say that in their opinion, the D-2b did not like to be
too close to the aft limit in order to get the most out of it. I will
say that I used the handbook table to calculate the amount of tail
water to add when I filled the wing tanks. I figured that it would
put me close to the aft C/G limit. I flew it like that, and did not like
that aft C/G location at all.

RO




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Landing out on a corporate mega-farm or other non-traditional ornon-optimal place? son_of_flubber Soaring 25 May 10th 13 12:15 AM
optimal altitude calculations? [email protected] Piloting 18 August 31st 05 03:48 AM
Optimal Frequency of Lessons David B. Cole Aerobatics 18 October 28th 04 12:50 AM
Picking Optimal Altitudes O. Sami Saydjari Instrument Flight Rules 20 January 8th 04 03:59 PM
[LBA] Schempp-Hirth - Discus bT - Discus Frederic FUCHS Soaring 0 September 17th 03 08:42 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.