A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Survey - 3 blade prop conversion- Cockpit vibration, happy or not



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old June 27th 04, 02:43 AM
Fly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Survey - 3 blade prop conversion- Cockpit vibration, happy or not

Hello Folks,
I asking for responses from any who have converted from a 2-blade to 3 blade
prop on their plane. I not interested in any performance claims but just
specifically the issue of cockpit vibration.
The prop mfg's and STC rep's are aware of this issue but express their
bewilderment to me. I've been looking for a common thread but haven't
found it yet. . There may be some engineer in a backroom somewhere who
knows the answer, but I haven't talked with him yet.
I don't have a better answer than anybody else.
I have been polling other owners groups and will later post what results I
can come up with.

It goes across the popular airframe models. Simply some are happy, others
are not. Even after a dynamic prop balance, some owners are not l not
happy with the different vibration, and different noise.
At the present, the conventional wisdom for those contemplating conversion,
is to not let go of the 2-blade until you are sure and make the deal to be
able to return the 3-blade for a refund if you choose.

It seems maybe that 6 Cyl Continentals which do not have a crankshaft 5th
order dampner or counterweight do not like 3 blades. i.e. Cessna 182 with
O-470-L or a Beech V35 with IO520-BA. Every Cessna produced with a
3-blade option, has an engine with a 4th,5th and 6th counterweight. Others
engines didn't, like the O-470L which has a 4th order and two 6th orders.

It could be that the models with scimitar blade design are the chief
culprit.
Some owners of Pipers and Mooneys with 4 cylinder Lycomings have asked me
about the vibration. All of them were scimitar blades.

Another factor is whether the conversion was done in conjunction with a
fresh engine overhaul versus midtime. Some speculate that at midtime, the
crank counterweights may have already worn in, taken a set, to the old prop
vibration.

I'd appreciate those who wish to participate if you let me know what
airframe and engine you have and what prop you went to, scimitar blade or
not. And whether the conversion was done fresh or at midtime and whether
you were happy or not with the cockpit vibration and noise.
Also useful would be a short note on how you percieved the vibration.

You can email me directly if you wish.


Thank you very much

Kent Felkins
Tulsa Oklahoma



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ivo Prop on O-320 Dave S Home Built 14 October 15th 04 03:04 AM
Hartzelll 3 blade prop Matt Whiting Owning 6 June 15th 04 01:29 AM
3 blade prop position on 6cyl engine. Paul Lee Home Built 3 February 26th 04 12:47 AM
Pitch and Diameter of 3 blade prop for IO-360 200HP Bart D. Hull Home Built 1 December 11th 03 11:42 PM
IVO props... comments.. Dave S Home Built 16 December 6th 03 11:43 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.