A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 28th 04, 12:27 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Cub Driver" wrote in message
...

Reading what appears to be a solid history of FDR and espionage.
Author makes the flat statement that in 1940 someone in the Norden
plant smuggled out the plans, which went to Germany. From these, the
Germans "developed their own bombsight," presumably based on the
Norden. The author points out the irony that at this point we still
wouldn't give Britain the bombsight (we did later).


The Germans did indeed have a complete set of plans
for the Norden bombsight courtesy of the efforts
of an employee named Hermann Lang, a naturalised
German immigrant who worked for Norden in Manhattan

Any truth to this? What part if any of the Norden sight did the
Germans utilize?


The German Lofte 7 bombsight was developed by people
who had access to the data from Norden and while
not a copy of the Norden design its likely they
learned a lot from it.

As to the US not offering the Nordern to the RAF it was
just as much a factor that the RAF did not consider that
tachometric bombsights such as the Norden, and British
ABS Mk 2 were suitable for night bombing from medium
altitudes. As a result the main BS used bu bomber command
would be the Blackett (MK XIV) which was simpler
and did not require as long a run up as the Norden

Keith


  #2  
Old April 28th 04, 08:32 PM
robert arndt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The German Lofte 7 bombsight was developed by people
who had access to the data from Norden and while
not a copy of the Norden design its likely they
learned a lot from it.


http://www.luftarchiv.info/bordgerate/optisch.htm

Lofte 7B-D further down the page.

Rob
  #3  
Old April 28th 04, 09:56 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
The German Lofte 7 bombsight was developed by people
who had access to the data from Norden and while
not a copy of the Norden design its likely they
learned a lot from it.


http://www.luftarchiv.info/bordgerate/optisch.htm

Lofte 7B-D further down the page.

Rob


Thanks , nice pictures.

Keith


  #4  
Old April 28th 04, 11:52 PM
Jim Doyle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
The German Lofte 7 bombsight was developed by people
who had access to the data from Norden and while
not a copy of the Norden design its likely they
learned a lot from it.


http://www.luftarchiv.info/bordgerate/optisch.htm

Lofte 7B-D further down the page.

Rob


Not being able to read German - could someone please explain the principal
workings of the gunsight in the first diagram? (The two concentric circles
and cross as rear sight, with vane-looking gizmo as foresight - attached to
the MG15).

I'd always wondered about them but never really bothered to find out.

Jim Doyle


  #5  
Old April 29th 04, 10:49 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


I'd always wondered about them but never really bothered to find out.


I think it's like the cost of owning a yacht--if you have to ask, you
can't afford one. (Vincent Astor? Whoever.)

Many things having to do with aviation are so complex, or perhaps are
explained so badly, that my mind goes blank in protest. Bombsights are
one of these. I read a book on the Norden and came away no wiser,
except to marvel: Gosh, how did anyone ever work that out?


all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com
Viva Bush! blog www.vivabush.org
  #6  
Old April 29th 04, 11:32 AM
Jim Doyle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Cub Driver" wrote in message
news

I'd always wondered about them but never really bothered to find out.


I think it's like the cost of owning a yacht--if you have to ask, you
can't afford one. (Vincent Astor? Whoever.)

Many things having to do with aviation are so complex, or perhaps are
explained so badly, that my mind goes blank in protest. Bombsights are
one of these. I read a book on the Norden and came away no wiser,
except to marvel: Gosh, how did anyone ever work that out?


Oh yes, I'm with you on that. Sadly I know that - 'Er... what the
hell...?!' - feeling all too well.


all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com
Viva Bush! blog www.vivabush.org



  #7  
Old April 29th 04, 06:02 PM
Laurence Doering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:52:59 +0100, Jim Doyle wrote:

"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
The German Lofte 7 bombsight was developed by people
who had access to the data from Norden and while
not a copy of the Norden design its likely they
learned a lot from it.


http://www.luftarchiv.info/bordgerate/optisch.htm


Not being able to read German - could someone please explain the principal
workings of the gunsight in the first diagram? (The two concentric circles
and cross as rear sight, with vane-looking gizmo as foresight - attached to
the MG15).


The caption for the illustrations doesn't say anything about how the sight
is supposed to work. My translation of the caption is:

Left: Example sight picture for the flexible-mount aircraft machine
gun with wind vane bead and ring sight. Right: Flexible-mount MG15
with wind vane bead and ring sight.

The caption above the illustrations just says "Sighting devices for
on-board weapons."

I dunno -- I guess the front bead is supposed to move around the
pivot attached to the gun barrel according to the relative wind.
Maybe it's supposed to help the gunner compensate for windage when
shooting to either side? I assume the whole assembly would be aligned
with the gun barrel when aiming directly forward or aft.


ljd
  #8  
Old April 28th 04, 08:44 PM
robert arndt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

As to the US not offering the Nordern to the RAF it was
just as much a factor that the RAF did not consider that
tachometric bombsights such as the Norden, and British
ABS Mk 2 were suitable for night bombing from medium
altitudes. As a result the main BS used bu bomber command
would be the Blackett (MK XIV) which was simpler
and did not require as long a run up as the Norden

Keith


Uh, the Brits DID use the SABS Mk.IIA from 1943 for precision bombing
(in clear weather, of course)!

Rob
  #9  
Old April 28th 04, 09:55 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
As to the US not offering the Nordern to the RAF it was
just as much a factor that the RAF did not consider that
tachometric bombsights such as the Norden, and British
ABS Mk 2 were suitable for night bombing from medium
altitudes. As a result the main BS used bu bomber command
would be the Blackett (MK XIV) which was simpler
and did not require as long a run up as the Norden

Keith


Uh, the Brits DID use the SABS Mk.IIA from 1943 for precision bombing
(in clear weather, of course)!

Rob


The SABS MkII was used in relatively small numbers. At the peak
of its use it was used by only 5 squadrons and in those only 3
aircraft in each were fitted with the SABS. Most were withdrawn
at the end of 1943 and only 617 Squadron was equipped
with the SABS MkIIA IRC

The problem with the SABS was each one was effectively hand made
and the training required to use it effectively was much more intense
than for the MkXIV . ISTR that even the bombardiers of 617 squadron
who were selected from the best available had to have special
coaching to use it effectively. Given the emphasis on area bombing
this was not regarded as justifiable for most units.

Keith


  #10  
Old April 28th 04, 10:30 PM
Jim Herring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cub Driver wrote:

Reading what appears to be a solid history of FDR and espionage.
Author makes the flat statement that in 1940 someone in the Norden
plant smuggled out the plans, which went to Germany. From these, the
Germans "developed their own bombsight," presumably based on the
Norden. The author points out the irony that at this point we still
wouldn't give Britain the bombsight (we did later).

Any truth to this? What part if any of the Norden sight did the
Germans utilize?


The story has been on the history channel. A worker at the Norden plant
stole blueprints and gave them to the Germans. As I recall from the
program, the Germans were able to reproduce the bombsight, but didn't
use it in combat.

--
Jim

carry on


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why was the Fokker D VII A Good Plane? Matthew G. Saroff Military Aviation 111 May 4th 04 05:34 PM
Germany invented it. We shot it down ArtKramr Military Aviation 54 March 8th 04 01:13 AM
Use of 150 octane fuel in the Merlin (Xylidine additive etc etc) Peter Stickney Military Aviation 45 February 11th 04 04:46 AM
About French cowards. Michael Smith Military Aviation 45 October 22nd 03 03:15 PM
Ungrateful Americans Unworthy of the French The Black Monk Military Aviation 62 October 16th 03 08:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.