If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 15:37:43 -0500, O. Sami Saydjari wrote:
Greg Copeland wrote: On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:53:36 -0600, Newps wrote: "Greg Copeland" wrote in message news Well, I guess that puts us back to the original question. I, like the orginal article's author, thought historical statistics were used to establish TBO numbers. If no one is tracking this information, where do the TBO numbers come from? Insurance liability statistics from wrecks? TBO comes from two places. 1) Marketing 2) A Guess LOL! Is anyone else bothered by this? I guess it's not really saying MTBF, it's just saying, your engine is ganna be tired when it hit this number. So, I guess that really isn't all that bad after all. I, for one, prefer to base my decisions on facts instead of speculations. How do they know the engine will be tired after x hours? What does tired mean? The only thing that would be meaningful to owners is probability of failure at X hours. It does not seem that collecting the data and calculating MTBF would be that hard. I sure hope the engineers who designed the engine did not use the same attitude with respect to the components they used! "Crankshaft A is 20% cheaper than Crankshaft B? Well, who cares, everyone knows that everyone just makes the reliability numbers up anyway. Let's use Crankshaft A." Arg! Well, there's no doubt that having an MTBF number with each engine would be nice to know, but I doubt you're going to get enough sampling from this group to even begin to eliminate noise. So, until someone is able to create a meaningful MTBF number for us, the TBO is the best we have. Which means, exactly what it says. It says, after x-number of hours, you should be considering an overhaul of the engine. I don't believe it speaks to anything else. In other words, one can assume it means, should you actually reach TBO without requiring an overhaul, at x-hours, you should be considering it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Proposals for air breathing hypersonic craft. I | Robert Clark | Military Aviation | 2 | May 26th 04 06:42 PM |
My Engine Fire!! | [email protected] | Owning | 1 | March 31st 04 01:41 PM |
Engine... Overhaul? / Replace? advice please | text news | Owning | 11 | February 17th 04 04:44 PM |
Car engine FAA certified for airplane use | Cy Galley | Home Built | 10 | February 6th 04 03:03 PM |
Corky's engine choice | Corky Scott | Home Built | 39 | August 8th 03 04:29 AM |